The objective of this commentary is to provide educators with suggestions for courses that focus on publicly engaged research. We present an engagement tool that can be used to contrast traditional versus engaged approaches to research and help students understand the role of the researcher in public engagement and develop their position with respect to publicly engaged research.
BridgerJeffrey C.AlterTed R.2007. “The Engaged University, Community Development, and Public scholarship.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement11 (1): 163–78.
2.
CashDavid W.AdgerW. NeilBerkesFikretGardenPoLebelLouisOlssonPerPritchardLowellYoungOran. 2006. “Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World.” Ecology and Society11 (2): 8–19.
3.
ChevalierJacques M.BucklesDaniel. 2019. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Research. New York: Routledge.
4.
CohenH. Floris. 2010. How Modern Science Came into the World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
5.
ConcilioGrazia. 2007. “Bricolaging Knowledge and Practices in Spatial Strategy-Making.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values, edited by CerretaMariaConcilioGraziaMonnoValeria, 281–301. Dordrecht: Springer.
6.
ConwayFlaxen D. L.2006. “Sharing Knowledge, Power, and Respect: Keys in Bringing Communities Together to Improve Science, Practice, and Relationships.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement11 (1): 133–43.
7.
DavenportThomas H.PrusakLaurence. 1998. Working Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
DzurAlbert W.2008. Democratic Professionalism: Citizen Participation and the Reconstruction of Professional Ethics, Identity, and Practice. University Park: Penn State University Press.
9.
FischerFrank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
10.
FischerFrank. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
FlyvbjergBent. 2002. “Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story.” Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (4): 353–66.
12.
FooteLeeKrogmanNaomi T.SpenceJohn R.2009. “Should Academics Advocate on Environmental Issues?”Society and Natural Resources22 (6): 579–89.
13.
FranzNancy K.2013. “Preventing Graduate Student Heroic Suicide in Community-Based Research: A Tale of Two Committees.” Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education3:111–27.
14.
FuntowiczSilvio O.RavetzJerome R.1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures25 (7): 739–55.
15.
GibbonsMichaelLimogesCamilleNowotnyHelgaSchwartzmanSimonScottPeterTrowMartin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
16.
HutchinsonMary. 2011. “Outside the Margins: Promotion and Tenure with a Public Scholarship Platform.” Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education1:133–55.
17.
IrwinAlanMichaelMike. 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Berkshire: Open University Press.
18.
JasanoffSheila. 2012. Science and Public Reason. New York: Routledge.
19.
KuhnThomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Lambert-PenningtonKatherine. 2012. “Editorial.” Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education2:7–13.
21.
McGettiganTimothy. 2011. Good Science in a Dark Age: The Pursuit and the Evolution of Reality. Lanham: Lexington Books.
MoonJenny A.2004. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.
24.
MortariLuigina.2015. “Reflectivity in Research Practice: An Overview of Different Perspectives.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 14 (5): 1–9.
25.
NicholdsAlyson. 2014. “Problematising Policy: Using Critical Reflexivity and Inter-Disciplinary Knowledge to Tackle Social and Economic Inequality.” 18th Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Ottawa, April 9–11.
26.
NowotnyHelgaScottPeter B.GibbonsMichael T.2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation Development. 2006. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation Development.
28.
PadtFrans J. G.PradhapanArchaana. 2019. “The Engagement Tool. Testing Student Readiness for Public Engagement in Research in Planning, Design, and Community Development.” Internal Report. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
29.
PhillipsLouise J.2011. “Analysing the Dialogic Turn in the Communication of Research-Based Knowledge: An Exploration of the Tensions in Collaborative Research.” Public Understanding of Science20 (1): 80–100.
30.
PolmanNicode BlaeijArianneSlingerlandMaja. 2014. “Knowledge of Competing Claims on Natural Resources: Toward Institutional Design and Integrative Negotiations.” In Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, edited by PadtFrans J. G.OpdamPaulPolmanNicoTermeerCatrien, 56–72. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
RittelHorst W. J.WebberMelvin M.1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences4:155–69.
32.
RydinYvonne. 2007. “Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge within Planning Theory.” Planning Theory6 (1): 52–68.
33.
SandercockLeonie. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. London: John Wiley.
34.
StanfieldRonWrenn.Mary2007. “Kuhn, Thomas and Scientific Paradigms.” In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by RitzerGeorge. Blackwell Publishing.
35.
StoeckerRandy. 2013. Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
36.
StokolsDaniel. 2006. “Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research.” American Journal of Community Psychology38:63–77.
37.
WashingtonHaydnCookJohn. 2011. Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. London: Earthscan.
