Using three case studies from the United States and Australia, this article explores the conditions required to make urban digital twin projects successful, considering a traditional urban digital twins (UDT) project and National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded 3D gaming digital twins in New York and a large-scale federated UDT platform in New South Wales (NSW) Australia. The authors argue that questions around interoperability and profit and tensions with democratic deliberation and socially beneficial outcomes necessitate best-practice “digital kin” models. These models are inclusive of different urban realities and diverse communities, as well as more closely integrated across platforms locations for use in participatory planning to advance social equity outcomes.
BattyMichael. 2024. “Digital Twins in City Planning.” Nature Computational Science4:192–99. doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00606-7.
4.
BettencourtLuis M. A.2024. “Recent Achievements and Conceptual Challenges for Urban Digital Twins.” Nature Computational Science4:150–53. doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00604-9.
5.
BorgesJorge Luis. 1998. “On Exactitude in Science.” In Jorge Luis Borges, Collected Fictions, translated by HurleyH., 325. London: Penguin Books.
CalzatiStefano. 2021. “Decolonising ‘Data Colonialism’ Propositions for Investigating the Realpolitik of Today’s Networked Ecology.” Television & New Media22 (8): 914–29.
8.
CharitonidouMarianna. 2022. “Urban Scale Digital Twins in Data-Driven Society: Challenging Digital Universalism in Urban Planning Decision-Making.” International Journal of Architectural Computing20 (2): 238–53.
ChongShu-LingChiangLi-WeiAllenJohn CarsonJr.FleeglerEric WilliamLeeLois Kaye. 2018. “Epidemiology of Pedestrian-Motor Vehicle Fatalities and Injuries, 2006-2015.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine55 (1): 98–105.
CottrillCaitlin D.ThakuriahPiyushimita Vonu. 2010. “Evaluating Pedestrian Crashes in Areas with High Low-Income or Minority Populations.” Accident; Analysis and Prevention42 (6): 1718–28.
DattaAyonaSircarSrilataHadfield-HillSophieButcherMelissaAditiAnweshaNicholsonPhilip. 2021. Learning from Small Cities, 1. London: Birkbeck, University of London; University of Birmingham.
15.
DembskiFabianWössnerUweLetzgusMikeRuddatMichaelYamuClaudia. 2020. “Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany.” Sustainability12 (6): 2307.
16.
EomSeok-Jin. 2022. “The Emerging Digital Twin Bureaucracy in the 21st Century.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance5 (2): 174–86.
Ferré-BigorraJaumeCasalsMiquelGangolellsMarta. 2022 “The Adoption of Urban Digital Twins.” Cities131:103905.
19.
FraserEmmaWilmottClancyPayneWill B.2025. “From the Urban Factory to the Metaverse: Understanding Datafication, Spatial Computing and Digital Twinning Practices.” New Media & Society. Forthcoming.
20.
GandalKeith. 1997. The Virtues of the Vicious: Jacob Riis, Stephen Crane, and the Spectacle of the Slum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
GandyMatthew. 2005. “Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29 (1): 26–49.
GrievesMichael. 2003. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication. Cocoa Beach, FL: Michael Grieves LLC.
26.
HajrasoulihaA.AmosD.2024. “Procedural Modeling in Urban Digital Twins as a Tool for Visualization, Analysis, and Public Engagement: Examining a Housing Policy in California.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically August 23. doi:10.1177/0739456X241269040
27.
HarawayDonna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies: FS14 (3): 575–99.
28.
HarawayDonna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Cthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
29.
HirokawaKeith H.SalkinPatricia. 2010. “Can Urban University Expansion Sustainable Development Co-exist: A Case Study in Progress on Columbia University.” Fordham Urban Law Journal37:637.
30.
HoustonDonnaHillierJeanMacCallumDianaSteeleWendyByrneJason. 2018. “Make Kin, Not Cities! Multispecies Entanglements and ‘Becoming-World’ in Planning Theory.” Planning Theory17 (2): 190–212.
31.
LarsonScott. 2013. “Building like Moses with Jacobs in Mind”: Contemporary Planning in New York City. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
LauriaultTracey P. 2022. “Looking Back toward a “Smarter” Open Data Future.” In The Future of Open Data, edited by RobinsonPamelaScassaTeresa, 19–53.
33.
LeónLuis F. AlvarezRosenJovanna. 2021. “Technology as Ideology in Urban Governance.” In Smart Spaces and Places, edited by BianLing 166–75. Abingdon: Routledge.
34.
MatternShannon. 2020. “A City Is Not a Computer.” In The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities, edited by WillisKatharine S.AurigiAlessandro, 17–28. Abingdon: Routledge.
35.
McCannEugene. 2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers101 (1): 107–30.
36.
National Science Foundation. 2023. About America’s Seed Fund Powered by NSF. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/our-program/.
37.
NochtaTimeaWanLiSchoolingJennifer MaryParlikadAjith Kumar. 2021. “A Socio-Technical Perspective on Urban Analytics: The Case of City-Scale Digital Twins.” Journal of Urban Technology28 (1–2): 263–87.
NSW Government. n.d.-d. NSW Spatial Digital Twin. Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Spatial Services NSW. https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/digital_twin (accessed November 15, 2023).
43.
NSW Government. n.d.-e. NSW Spatial Digital Twin. Canberra: Terria.io; Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Spatial Services NSW. https://nsw.digitaltwin.terria.io (accessed December 1, 2023).
QuekHou YeeSielkerFranziskaAkroydJethroBhaveAmit N.von RichthofenAurelHerthogsPietervan der Laag YamuClaudia, et al. 2023. “The Conundrum in Smart City Governance: Interoperability Compatibility in an Ever-Growing Ecosystem of Digital Twins.” Data Policy5:e6.
RobinsonJennifer. 2015. “‘Arriving at’ Urban Policies: The Topological Spaces of Urban Policy Mobility.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39 (4): 831–34.
48.
RobinsonPamelaScassaTeresa. 2022. The Future of Open Data. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
49.
RoyAnanya. 2011. “Urbanisms, Worlding Practices and the Theory of Planning.” Planning Theory10 (1): 6–15.
50.
SammlerKatherine G.House-PetersLily. 2023. “Unblack-boxing Mediation in the Digital Mine.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences141:103745.
StabrowskiFilip. 2015. “Inclusionary Zoning and Exclusionary Development: The Politics of ‘Affordable Housing’ in North Brooklyn.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39 (6): 1120–36.
TzachorAsafSabriSoheilRichardsCatherine E.RajabifardAbbasAcutoMichele. 2022. “Potential and Limitations of Digital Twins to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.” Nature Sustainability5 (10): 822–29.
55.
VasudevanRakshaNovoa E.Magdalena2022. “Pluriversal Planning Scholarship: Embracing Multiplicity and Situated Knowledges in Community-Based Approaches.” Planning Theory21 (1): 77–100.
56.
WhiteGaryZinkAnnaCodecáLaraClarkeSiobhán. 2021. “A Digital Twin Smart City for Citizen Feedback.” Cities110:103064.
57.
WilmottClancyFraserEmmaPayneWill B.2025. “Expanding the City Digital Twin in the Context of Crisis, Cartography, and Computation.” Dialogues in Urban Research. Published electronically March 3. doi:10.1177/27541258251318986.
58.
WuTim GuangyuGuanChengHe. 2024. “Advancing Intra and Inter-city Urban Digital Twins: An Updated Review.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically June 19. doi:10.1177/0739456X241260887.
59.
YeXinyueDuJiaxinHanYuNewmanGalenRetchlessDavidZouLeiHamYoungjibCaiZhenhang. 2022. “Developing Human-Centered Urban Digital Twins for Community Infrastructure Resilience: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Planning Literature38 (2): 187–99.
60.
YeXinyueNewmanGalenLeeChanamVan ZandtShannonJourdanDawn. 2023. “Toward Urban Artificial Intelligence for Developing Justice-Oriented Smart Cities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research43 (1): 6–7.
