The focus of plan quality is on evaluating plans-as-objects against normative characteristics researchers and planning practitioners believe contribute to a high quality plan. This study builds on the established plan quality literature and methods to assess the quality of official (comprehensive) plans from sixty-three of the most populous municipalities in the Ontario-Greater Golden Horseshoe region (Canada). Three key themes emerged from this analysis. First, the provincial government plays a role in municipal official plan quality. Second, monitoring and evaluation is underutilized in many plans. Third, the communication of plan contents could be improved to enhance its use and readability.
BaynhamMaggieStevensMark. 2014. “Are We Planning Effectively for Climate Change? An Evaluation of Official Community Plans in British Columbia.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management57 (4): 557–87. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.756805.
4.
BerkePhilip R.FrenchSteven P.1994. “The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 237–50. doi:10.1177/0739456X9401300401.
5.
BerkePhilip R.GodschalkDavid R.2009. “Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-analysis of Plan Quality Studies.” Journal of Planning Literature23 (3): 227–40. doi:10.1177/0885412208327014.
6.
BerkePhilip R.GodschalkDavid R.KaiserEdward J.RodriguezDavid A.2006. Urban Land Use Planning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
7.
BerkePhilip R.NewmanGalenLeeJaekyungCombsTabithaKolosnaCarlSalvesenDavid. 2015. “Evaluation of Networks of Plans and Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: A Resilience Scorecard.” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (4): 287–302. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1093954.
8.
BerkePhilip R.SmithGavinLylesWard. 2012. “Planning for Resiliency: Evaluation of State Hazard Mitigation Plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act.” Natural Hazard Review13 (2): 139–49. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063.
9.
BrodySamuel D.2003a. “Are We Learning to Make Better Plans? A Longitudinal Analysis of Plan Quality Associated with Natural Hazards.” Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (2): 191–201. doi:10.1177/0739456X03258635.
10.
BrodySamuel D.2003b. “Implementing the Principles of Ecosystem Management through Local Land Use Planning.” Population and Environment24 (6): 511–40. doi:10.1023/A:1025078715216.
11.
BunnellGeneJepsonEdward J.Jr.2011. “The Effect of Mandated Planning on Plan Quality: A Fresh Look at What Makes “a Good Plan.”” Journal of the American Planning Association77 (4): 338–53. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.619951.
12.
ConnellDavid J.Daoust-FiliatraultLou-Anne. 2017. “Better than Good: Three Dimensions of Plan Quality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research38 (3): 265–72. doi:10.1177/0739456X17709501.
13.
DaltonLinda C.BurbyRaymond J.1994. “Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development Management.” Journal of the American Planning Association60 (4): 444–61. doi:10.1080/01944369408975604.
14.
FaludiAndreas. 2000. “The Performance of Spatial Planning.” Planning Practice & Research15 (4): 299–318. doi:10.1080/713691907.
15.
FischlerRaphaël. 2012. “Fifty Theses on Urban Planning and Urban Planners.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (1): 107–14. doi:10.1177/0739456X11420441.
16.
GuyadeenDave. 2018. “Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights from a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada.” Journal of the American Planning Association84 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1404486.
17.
GuyadeenDaveSeasonsMark. 2018. “Evaluation Theory and Practice: Comparing Program Evaluation and Evaluation in Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research38 (1): 98–110.
18.
GuyadeenDaveThistlethwaiteJasonHenstraDaniel. 2019. “Evaluating the Quality of Municipal Climate Change Plans in Canada.” Climatic Change152:121–43. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2312-1.
HorneyJenniferNguyenMaiSalvesenDavidDwyerCarolineCooperJohnBerkePhilip. 2017. “Assessing the Quality of Rural Hazard Mitigation Plans in the Southeastern United States.” Journal of Planning Education and Research37 (1): 56–65. doi:10.1177/0739456X16628605.
21.
KaiserEdward J.GodschalkDavid R.ChapinS. F.1995. Urban Land Use. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
22.
KimHyun WooLiMing-Han. 2017. “Managing Stormwater for Urban Sustainability: An Evaluation of Local Comprehensive Plans in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Region.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management60 (10): 1702–25. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1251399.
23.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed.Los Angeles: SAGE.
24.
LaurianLucieCrawfordJanDayMaxineKouwenhovenPeterMasonGregEricksenNeilBeattieLee. 2010. “Evaluating the Outcomes of Plans: Theory, Practice, and Methodology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37 (4): 740–57. doi:10.1068/b35051.
25.
LylesWardBerkePhilipSmithGavin. 2016. “Local Plan Implementation: Assessing Conformance and Influence of Local Plans in the United States.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43 (2): 381–400. doi:10.1177/0265813515604071.
26.
LylesWardStevensMark. 2014. “Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and Contributions, Limitations, and New Directions.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (4): 433–50. doi:10.1177/0739456X14549752.
27.
Manta ConroyMariaBerkePhilip R.2004. “What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space36 (8): 1381–96. doi:10.1068/a367.
28.
Manta ConroyMariaJunHee-Jung. 2016. “Planning Process Influences on Sustainability in Ohio Township Plans.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management59 (11): 2007–23. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1103709.
29.
MayPeterBurbyRaymond. 1996. “Coercive versus Cooperative Policies: Comparing Intergovernmental Mandate Performance.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management15 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199621)15:2<171::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-G.
30.
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 2013. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006. https://www.placestogrow.ca.
NortonRichard K.2005. “More and Better Local Planning: State-mandated Local Planning in Coastal North Carolina.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (1): 55–70. doi:10.1080/01944360508976405.
33.
NortonRichard K.2008. “Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes.” Land Use Policy25 (3): 432–54. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006.
34.
NortonRichard K.DavidNina P.BuckmanStephenKomanPatricia D.2018. “Overlooking the Coast: Limited Local Planning for Coastal Area Management along Michigan’s Great Lakes.” Land Use Policy71:183–203. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.049.
35.
OliveiraVitorPinhoPaulo. 2010. “Evaluation in Urban Planning: Advances and Prospects.” Journal of Planning Literature24 (4): 343–61. doi:10.1177/0885412210364589.
36.
OliveiraVitorPinhoPaulo. 2011. “Bridging the Gap between Planning Evaluation and Programme Evaluation: The Contribution of the PPR Methodology.” Evaluation17 (3): 293–307. doi:10.1177/1356389011411686.
PottsRuth. 2017. “The Good, the Bad, and the Statutory: Are Statutory or Non-statutory Natural Resource Management Plans Higher in Quality?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning19 (6): 668–81. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1265885.
39.
RudolfSophie C.GradinaruSimona R.2019. “The Quality and Implementation of Local Plans: An Integrated Evaluation.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46 (5): 880–96. doi:10.1177/2399808317737070.
40.
RudolfSophie C.GradinaruSimona R.HerspergerAnna M.2017. “Impact of Planning Mandates on Local Plans: A Multi-method Assessment.” European Planning Studies25 (12): 2192–2211. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1353592.
41.
SanctonAndrew. 2014. Canadian Local Government: An Urban Perspective. 2nd ed.Toronto: Oxford University Press.
42.
SaundersWendyGraceEmilyBebanJames. 2015. “Evaluating Land Use and Emergency Management Plans for Natural Hazards as a Function of Good Governance: A Case Study from New Zealand.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science6 (1): 62–74.
43.
SpurlockDanielle. 2018. “Do Mandates Matter for Plan Quality? Jurisdictional Aggregation for a Watershed Level Comparison.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management61:2257–79. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1391070.
44.
StevensMark R.2013. “Evaluating the Quality of Official Community Plans in Southern British Columbia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (4): 471–90. doi:10.1177/0739456X13505649.
45.
StevensMark R.LylesWardBerkePhilip R.2014. “Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1177/0739456X13513614.
46.
StevensMark R.SenbelMaged. 2017. “Are Municipal Land Use Plans Keeping Pace with Global Climate Change?” Land Use Policy68:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.026.
47.
StevensMark R.ShoubridgeJessica. 2015. “Municipal Hazard Mitigation Planning: A Comparison of Plans in British Columbia and the United States.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management58 (11): 1988–2014. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.973479.
48.
TangZhenghongBrodySamuel D.2009. “Linking Planning Theories with Factors Influencing Local Environmental-plan Quality.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36 (3): 522–37. doi:10.1068/b34076.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
