This study examines the relationship between light rail transit (LRT) stations and changes in neighborhood characteristics associated with gentrification using spatial regression analyses with longitudinal data across 14 US urbanized areas (UAs). Overall, we do not find evidence of prevalent gentrification in LRT station areas. An analysis of UA-specific impacts shows heterogeneous outcomes across different UAs, particularly: strong transit-oriented development (TOD) effects accompanied by gentrification in San Francisco and TOD with countergentrification in Portland. Our results highlight that different local and regional planning efforts can lead to different types of changes in transit station neighborhoods.
AnselinL.2002. “Under the Hood: Issues in the Specification and Interpretation of Spatial Regression Models.” Agricultural Economics27 (3): 247–67.
2.
Arribas-BelD.Sanz-GraciaF.2014. “The Validity of the Monocentric City Model in a Polycentric Age: US Metropolitan Areas in 1990, 2000 and 2010.” Urban Geography35 (7): 980–97.
3.
AtkinsonR.2000 “Measuring Gentrification and Displacement in Greater London.” Urban Studies37 (1): 149–65.
4.
BaeC-H. C.2002. “Orenco Station, Portland, Oregon: A Successful Transit Oriented Development Experiment?” Transportation Quarterly56 (3): 9–18.
BernickM.CerveroR.1997. Transit Villages in the 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
BivandR.HaukeJ.KossowskiT.2013. “Computing the Jacobian in Gaussian Spatial Autoregressive Models: An Illustrated Comparison of Available Methods.” Geographical Analysis45 (2): 150–79.
BridgeG.ButlerT.LeesL.2012. Mixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?Bristol, UK: Polity Press.
12.
Brown-SaracinoJ.2004. “Social Preservationists and the Quest for Authentic Community.” City & Community3 (2): 135–56.
13.
Brown-Saracino. 2009. A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BrysonJ.2012. “Brownfields Gentrification: Redevelopment Planning and Environmental Justice in Spokane, Washington.” Environmental Justice5 (1): 26–31.
15.
CaoX. J.SchonerJ.2014. “The Influence of Light Rail Transit on Transit Use: An Exploration of Station Area Residents along the Hiawatha Line in Minneapolis.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice59:134–43.
CerveroR.LandisJ.1997. “Twenty Years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System: Land Use and Development Impacts.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice31 (4): 309–33.
18.
CerveroR.FerrellC.MurphyS.2002. “Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review.” TCRP Research Results Digest52.
19.
ChatmanD. G.TulachN. K.KimK.2012. “Evaluating the Economic Impacts of Light Rail by Measuring Home Appreciation: A First Look at New Jersey’s River Line.” Urban Studies49 (3): 467–87.
20.
ClarkE.1992. “On Blindness, Centrepieces and Complementarity in Gentrification Theory.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers17 (3): 358–62.
21.
ClayP. L.1979. Neighborhood Renewal: Middle-Class Resettlement and Incumbent Upgrading in American Neighborhoods. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22.
CooleyW.2010. “Moving On Out: Black Pioneering in Chicago, 1915-1950.” Journal of Urban History36 (4): 485–506.
23.
DavidsonM.2008. “Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-Led ‘Positive’ Gentrification End?” Urban Studies45 (12): 2385–2405.
24.
DavisT.OakleyD.2013. “Linking Charter School Emergence to Urban Revitalization and Gentrification: A Socio-spatial Analysis of Three Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs35 (1): 81–102.
25.
de SmithM J. 2015. STATSREF: Statistical Analysis Handbook: A Web-Based Statistics Resource. Winchelsea, UK: The Winchelsea Press.
26.
DawkinsC.MoeckelR.2016. “Transit-Induced Gentrification: Who Will Stay, and Who Will Go?.” Housing Policy Debate26 (4-5): 1-18.
27.
DebrezionG.PelsE. A. J. H.RietveldP.2010. “The Impact of Rail Transport on Real Estate Prices: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Housing Market.” Urban Studies48 (5): 997–1015.
28.
DillonL.2014. “Race, Waste, and Space: Brownfield Redevelopment and Environmental Justice at the Hunters Point Shipyard.” Antipode46 (5): 1205–21.
29.
DuncanM.2010. “The Impact of Transit-Oriented Development on Housing Prices in San Diego, CA.” Urban Studies48 (1): 101–27.
30.
DuncanM.2011. “The Synergistic Influence of Light Rail Stations and Zoning on Home Prices.” Environment and Planning A43 (9): 2125-2142.
31.
EssokaJ. D.2010. “The Gentrifying Effects of Brownfields Redevelopment.” Western Journal of Black Studies34 (3): 299–315.
32.
FeinsteinB. D.AllenA.2011. “Community Benefits Agreements with Transit Agencies: Neighborhood Change along Boston’s Rail Lines and a Legal Strategy for Addressing Gentrification.” Transportation Law Journal38 (85): 85–113.
33.
FreemanL.2005. “Displacement or Succession?: Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review40 (4): 463–91.
34.
GardnerT. K.MarlayM.2013. “Whither the Jobs: Identifying Concentrations of Employment in Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Geography34 (6): 795–814.
35.
GolubA.GuhathakurtaS.SollapuramB.2012. “Spatial and Temporal Capitalization Effects of Light Rail in Phoenix: From Conception, Planning, and Construction to Operation.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (4): 415–29.
36.
Grube-CaversA.PattersonZ.2014. “Urban Rapid Rail Transit and Gentrification in Canadian Urban Centres: A Survival Analysis Approach.” Urban Studies52 (1): 1–17.
37.
GuerraE.CerveroR.TischlerD.2012. “Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2276): 101–9.
38.
HankinsK. B.2007. “The Final Frontier: Charter Schools as New Community Institutions of Gentrification.” Urban Geography28 (2): 113–28.
39.
HessD. B.AlmeidaT. M.2007. “Impact of Proximity to Light Rail Rapid Transit on Station-Area Property Values in Buffalo, New York.” Urban Studies44 (5/6): 1041–68.
40.
KahnM. E.2007. “Gentrification Trends in New Transit-Oriented Communities: Evidence from 14 Cities that Expanded and Built Rail Transit Systems.” Real Estate Economics35 (2): 155–82.
41.
KisslingW. D.CarlG.2008. “Spatial Autocorrelation and the Selection of Simultaneous Autoregressive Models.” Global Ecology and Biogeography17 (1): 59–71.
42.
KnaapG. J.DingC.HopkinsL. D.2001. “Do Plans Matter?: The Effects of Light Rail Plans on Land Values in Station Areas.” Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (1): 32–39.
43.
KohnM.2013. “What Is Wrong with Gentrification?” Urban Research & Practice6 (3): 297–310.
44.
LandisJ.2016. “Tracking and Explaining Neighborhood Socioeconomic Change in US Metropolitan Areas between 1990 and 2010.” Housing Policy Debate26 (1): 1–51.
45.
LeeB.2007. “‘Edge’ or ‘Edgeless’ Cities? Urban Spatial Structure in US Metropolitan Areas, 1980 to 2000.” Journal of Regional Science47 (3): 479–515.
46.
LeyD.1986. “Alternative Explanations for Inner-City Gentrification: A Canadian Assessment.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers76 (4): 521–35.
47.
LeyD.1996. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
LinJ.2002. “Gentrification and Transit in Northwest Chicago.” Transportation Quarterly56 (4): 175–91.
49.
LoganJ. R.XuZ.StultsB. J.2014. “Interpolating US Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010: A Longitudinal Tract Database.” Professional Geographer66 (3): 412–20.
MarcuseP.1985. “Gentrification, Abandonment, and Displacement: Connections, Causes, and Policy Responses in New York City.” Washington University Urban Law Journal; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law28:195–240.
52.
MazerolleM. J.2004. Appendix 1: Making Sense out of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): Its Use and Interpretation in Model Selection and Inference from Ecological Data.”Mouvements et Reproduction des Amphibiens en Tourbières Perturbées174–90.
MeligranaJ.SkaburskisA.2005. “Extent, Location and Profiles of Continuing Gentrification in Canadian Metropolitan Areas, 1981-2001.” Urban Studies42 (9): 1569–92.
Minnesota Population Center. 2011. National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 2.0. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota2011. http://www.nhgis.org.
RevingtonNick. 2015. “Gentrification, Transit, and Land Use: Moving Beyond Neoclassical Theory.” Geography Compass9 (3): 152–63.
63.
RoseD.1984. “Rethinking Gentrification: Beyond the Uneven Development of Marxist Urban Theory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2 (1): 47–74.
ShawG.WheelerD.1994. Statistical Techniques in Geographical Analysis. London: David Fulton.
67.
SlaterT.2009. “Missing Marcuse: On Gentrification and Displacement.” City13 (2/3): 292–311.
68.
SmithN.1987. “Gentrification and the Rent Gap.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers77 (3): 462–65.
69.
SmithN.2010. “Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People.” In The Gentrification Reader, edited by LeesLorettaSlaterTomWylyElvin, 85–96. London: Routledge.
70.
SoursourianM.2010. “Equipping Communities to Achieve Equitable Transit-Oriented Development.” Community Investments22 (2): 22–27.
71.
StilwellF.1993. Reshaping Australia: Urban Problems and Policies. Sydney: Pluto Press.
UitermarkJ.DuyvendakJ. W.KleinhansR.2007. “Gentrification as a Governmental Strategy: Social Control and Social Cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam.” Environment and Planning A39 (1): 125–41.
77.
United States Bureau of the Census. 1983. Geographic Reference Manual: 1982 Economic Censuses. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
WuW.ZhangL.2013. “Comparison of Spatial and Non-spatial Logistic Regression Models for Modeling the Occurrence of Cloud Cover in North-eastern Puerto Rico.” Applied Geography37: 52-62.
84.
ZukM.BierbaumAriel H.ChappleKarenGorskaKarolinaLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaOngPaulThomasTrevor. 2015. “Gentrification, Displacement and the Role of Public Investment: A Literature Review.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
85.
ZukinS. 2013. “The Creation of a ‘Loft Lifestyle.’” In The Gentrification Debates: A Reader 2013, edited by Brown-SaracinoJaponica, 175–84. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
