The article illustrates the extent to which “ideal” internationally formulated transit-oriented development (TOD) principles and models are relevant to Dutch circumstances and perceptions. The evidence presented in the article suggests that while Dutch TOD specialists agree with many of the basic TOD design principles laid out in the international literature, their views about specific design aspects are closely linked to national cultural predilections and practices. The data was obtained through a design workshop involving key TOD specialists (academics, policy officials, and consultants) using a multi-media approach.
BertoliniLucaCurtisCareyRenneJohn. 2012. “Station Area projects in Europe and Beyond: Towards Transit Oriented Development?”Built Environment38 (1): 31–50.
2.
BullCatherin, ed. 2007. Cross-Cultural Urban Design: Global or Local Practice?London: Routledge.
3.
CalthorpePeter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
ClementeOttoEwingReidHandySusanBrownsonRoss. 2005. Measuring Urban Design Qualities: An Illustrated Field Manual. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
9.
CurtisCareyRenneJohnBertoliniLuca, eds. 2009. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen. London: Ashgate.
DitmarrHankOhlandGloria. 2004. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
DunphyRobertMyersonDeborahPawlukiewiczMichael. 2003. Ten Principles for Successful Development around Transit. Washington, DC: ULI-the Urban Land Institute.
13.
EwingReid. 1996. “Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design.” Report prepared for the Public Transit Office, Florida Department of Transportation, published by the American Planning Association.
14.
EwingReidBartholomewKeith. 2013. Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Design. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute and American Planning Association.
15.
EwingReidClementeOtto. 2013. Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places. Washington, DC: Island Press.
16.
ForsythAnnJacobsonJustinTheringKatie. 2010. “Six Assessments of the Same Places: Comparing Views of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design15(1):21-48.
GeursKarstMaatKeesRietveldPietde VisserGert. 2012. “Transit Oriented Development in the Randstad South Wing: Goals, Issues and Research.” Paper presented at conference Building the Urban Future and Transit Oriented Development, 16–17 April, Paris, France.
19.
GospodiniAspa. 2002. “European Cities in Competition and the New ‘Uses’ of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design7 (1): 59–73.
20.
IbelingsHans. 1999. 20th Century Urban Design in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: NAi.
21.
JacobsonJustinForsythAnn. 2008. “Seven American TODs: Good Practices for Urban Design in Transit-Oriented Development Projects.” Journal of Transport and Land Use1 (2): 51–88.
22.
LawtonPhilip. 2013. “Understanding Urban Practitioners’ Perspectives on Social Mix Policies in Amsterdam: The Importance of Design and Social Space.” Journal of Urban Design18 (1): 98–118.
23.
MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority). 2010. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. 2007. “Transit Oriented Development Guidelines.” Atlanta. http://www.itsmarta.com/TOD_Guidelines_2010-06-22.pdf (accessed May 28, 2014).
PojaniDorinaSteadDominic. 2014a. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Explaining Dutch Transit Oriented Development Challenges.” Environment and Planning A doi:10.1068/a130169p.
26.
PojaniDorinaSteadDominic. 2014b. “Going Dutch? The Export of Sustainable Land-Use and Transport Planning Concepts from the Netherlands” Urban Studies, doi: 10.1177/0042098014562326.
27.
PojaniDorinaSteadDominic. 2014c. “Dutch Planning Policy: The Resurgence of TOD.” Land Use Policy41:357–67.
28.
PortaSergioRenneJohn Luciano. 2005. “Linking Urban Design to Sustainability: Formal Indicators of Social Urban Sustainability Field Research in Perth, Western Australia.” Urban Design International10 (1): 51–64.
29.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalph. 2008. “Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.” Transport Reviews28 (4): 495–528.
SiegmanPatrick. 2003. “Is It Really TOD?”Planning69 (5): 17.
32.
SmitAnnet J.2011. “The Influence of District Visual Quality on Location Decisions of Creative Entrepreneurs.” Journal of the American Planning Association77 (2): 167–84.
TanWendy. 2009. “Policy Context of Key Transit-Oriented Projects for Station Locations within the Netherlands.” Paper presented at conference Railways, Real Estate, and the Remaking of Cities in the 21st Century: Rail Station Redevelopment Mega Projects in Europe, North America, and Beyond, Berlin, 10 October.
35.
TCRP (Transit Cooperative Research Program). 1997. “The Role of Transit in Creating Livable Metropolitan Communities.” TCRP Report 22, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
36.
TCRP (Transit Cooperative Research Program). 2002. “Transit Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review.” Research Results Digest52.
