Transit’s land use-shaping capability is an important justification and goal for fixed-guideway transit investment. While transit facility designs are expected to inform transit-oriented development (TOD), little research has examined how U.S. professionals incorporate TOD considerations into transit project planning. Through interviews, this study described how transit professionals identified TOD opportunities and how TOD considerations informed project designs across 19 U.S. regions, often substantially. However, the ways interviewees identified TOD opportunities were often inconsistent with the TOD literature, which may partially explain some transit planners’ unmet TOD expectations. Findings suggest that there is room for improvement in practitioners’ TOD-related transit planning practices.
AltshulerAlanLuberoffDavid E. 2003. Mega-projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
2.
ArgyrisChrisSchonDonald A. 1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BartlettRandall. 2003. “Testing the ‘Popsicle Test’: Realities of Retail Shopping in New ‘Traditional Neighbourhood Developments.’” Urban Studies40 (8): 1471–85.
4.
BoarnetMarlonJohKennethSiembabWalterFultonWilliamNguyenMai Thi. 2011. “Retrofitting the Suburbs to Increase Walking: Evidence from a Land-Use-Travel Study.” Urban Studies48 (1): 129–59.
5.
CerveroRobert. 1984. “Light Rail Transit and Urban Development.” Journal of the American Planning Association50 (2): 133–47.
6.
CerveroRobertMurphyStevenFerrellChristopher, et al. 2004. “Transit Oriented Development in America: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects.” TCRP Report 102, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
7.
ChatmanDanielTulachNicholasKimKyeongsu. 2011. “Evaluating the Economic Impacts of Light Rail by Measuring Home Appreciation: A First Look at New Jersey’s River Line.” Urban Studies49 (3): 467–87.
CurtisCareyRenneJohn L.BertoliniLuca. 2009. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen. Transport and Mobility Series. Farnham: Ashgate.
10.
DeakinElizabethFerrellChristopherMasonJonathanThomasJohn. 2002. “Policies and Practices for Cost-Effective Transit Investments: Recent Experiences in the United States.” Transportation Research Record1799 (1): 1–9.
11.
DeakinElizabethPayneMarianneMenottiVal. 2004. “Development of Bay Area Rapid Transit System Expansion Criteria and Process.” Transportation Research Record1887 (1): 18–25. doi:10.3141/1887-03.
12.
DittmarHankOhlandGloria. 2004. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13.
DunphyRobert. 2003. Ten Principles for Successful Development around Transit. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
14.
ErautMichael. 1994. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Falmer Press.
FischlerRaphael. 2012. “Reflective Practice.” In Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice, edited by SanyalBishwapriyaValeLawrence J.RosanChristina D., 313–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19.
FlyvbjergBent. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
FlyvbjergBentHolmMette SkamrisBuhlSoren. 2002. “Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?” Journal of the American Planning Association68 (3): 279–95.
21.
FlyvbjergBentLandmanToddSchramSanford. 2012. Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
ForesterJohnKreiswirthBrian. 1993. Profiles of Planners in Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
23.
GiulianoGenevieve. 2011. “Transportation Policy: Public Transit, Settlement Patterns, and Equity in the United States.” In The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning, edited by BrooksNancyDonaghyKieranKnaapGerrit-Jan, 562–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GiulianoGenevieveAgarwalAjay. 2010. “Public Transit as a Metropolitan Growth and Development Strategy.” In Urban and Regional Policy and Its Effects, edited by PindusNancyWialHowardWolmanHarold, 205–52. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25.
Government Accountability Office.2010. “Federal Role in Value Capture Strategies for Transit Is Limited, but Additional Guidance Could Help Clarify Policies.” GAO-10-781, Public Transportation, Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
26.
KainJohn F.1999. “The Urban Transportation Problem: A Reexamination and Update.” In Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer, edited by Gómez-IbáñezJosé A.TyeWilliam B.WinstonClifford, 359–401. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
KemmisBill. 2009. “Understanding Professional Practice: A Synoptic Framework.” In Understanding and Researching Professional Practice, edited by GreenBill, 19–38. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
28.
KnightRobert L.1980. “Transit’s Land Use Impacts: Evidence and a Change of Perspective.” In New Urban Rail Transit: How Can Its Development and Growth-Shaping Potential Be Realized, Vol. 96th Congress, First Session. 96–97. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
KnightRobert L.TryggLisa L. 1977. “Land Use Impacts of Rapid Transit: Implications of Recent Experience, Executive Summary.” DOT-TPI-10-77-31, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
30.
KrumholzNormanForesterJohn. 1990. Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector. Conflicts in Urban and Regional Development. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
LevineJonathan C.2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land-Use. New York: Resources for the Future.
32.
MeyerJohnKainJohn F.WohlMartin. 1965. The Urban Transportation Problem. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33.
MilesMike E.NethertonLaurence M.SchmitzAdrienne, eds. 2015. Real Estate Development: Principles and Process. 5th ed.Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
34.
MooreTerryThorsnesPaulAppleyard.Bruce. 2007. The Transportation/Land Use Connection. 2007 ed. Report No. 546/547. Planning Advisory Service. Chicago: American Planning Association.
35.
NelsonDickNilesJohn. 1999. “Market Dynamics and Nonwork Travel Patterns; Obstacles to Transit-Oriented Development?” Transportation Research Record1669 (1): 13–21.
36.
NelsonDickNiles.John. 2001. “A New Planning Template for Transit-Oriented Development.” Technical Report FHWA/CA/R-96/26, Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies, San Jose, CA.
37.
OrskiC. Kenneth. 1980. “The Federal Rail Transit Policy: Principles and Practice.” In New Urban Rail Transit: How Can Its Development and Growth-Shaping Potential Be Realized, Vol. 96th Congress, First Session, 96–97. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. 1996. “Transit and Urban Form.” TCRP Report 16, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
39.
PorterDouglas R.1997. “Transit Focused Development: A Synthesis of Practice.” TCRP Synthesis 20, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
40.
PorterDouglas R.1998. “Transit-Focused Development: A Progress Report.” Journal of the American Planning Association64 (4): 475–88.
41.
RenneJohnWellsJan. 2005. “Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success.” NCHRP Research Results Digest 294, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
42.
SchonDonald A.1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
43.
SchonDonald A.1990. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary. 2011. “Notice of Funding Availability for the Department of Transportation’s National Infrastructure Investments under the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations, 2011; and Request for Comment.” Federal Register76 (156): 50289.
45.
WachsMartin. 1989. “When Planners Lie with Numbers.” Journal of the American Planning Association55 (4): 476–79.
46.
WachsMartin. 1990. “Ethics and Advocacy in Forecasting for Public Policy.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal9 (1&2): 141–57.
