Community-university partnerships are an established concept but are not typically central to the core planning curriculum. This study highlights a model of teaching innovation, Integrated Community Planning Core, where the core directly supports the departmental mission by bridging research and practice. The article explains the curriculum development process and assesses its ability to serve community, student, and faculty needs. Data collected from focus groups, student reflection papers, and practicing planner debriefings demonstrate the model is modestly successful, but adaptations are needed to communicate the value to students, the planning academy, and the university.
AbbottCarl. 2008. How cities won the West: Four centuries of urban change in western North America. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
2.
AgyemanJulianEricksonJennifer Sien. 2012. Culture, recognition, and the negotiation of difference: Some thoughts on cultural competency in planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (3): 358–66.
3.
AndersonLorin W.KrathwohlDavid R.2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
4.
BaumHowell S.2000. Fantasies and realities in university-community partnerships. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (2): 234–46.
5.
BensonLeeHarkavyIraPuckettJohn. 2000. “An Implementation Revolution as a Strategy for Fulfilling the Democratic Promise of University-Community Partnerships: Penn-West Philadelphia as an Experiment in Progress.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly29 (1): 24–45.
6.
BirchEugenie Ladner. 2010. Anchor institutions and their role in metropolitan change: White paper on Penn IUR initiatives on anchor institutions. Philadelphia: Penn Institute for Urban Research, University of Pennsylvania.
7.
BloomBenjamin S.1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives; the classification of educational goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
8.
BournerTom. 2010. A compatible partnership?Gateways: International Journal of Community Research & Engagement3:139–54.
9.
ChristensenPerThraneMikkelJørgensenTine HerreborgLehmannMartin. 2009. Sustainable development: Assessing the gap between preaching and practice at Aalborg University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education10 (1): 4–20.
10.
CoxKevin R.2004. Globalization and the politics of local and regional development: The question of convergence. TRAN: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers29 (2): 179–94.
11.
D’AgostinoMaria J.2008. Fostering a civically engaged society: The university and service learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education14 (2): 191–204.
12.
DavidoffPaul. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331–38.
13.
DickBob. 2011. Action Research literature 2008-2010: Themes and trends. Action Research9 (2): 122–43.
14.
EdwardsMary M.Bates.Lisa K.2011. Planning’s core curriculum: Knowledge, practice, and implementation. Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (2): 172–83.
FrankNancy. 2002. Rethinking planning theory for a master’s-level curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (3): 323–30. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100309
17.
GoldsmithW. W.1998. Fishing bodies out of the river: Can universities help troubled neighborhoods?Connecticut Law Review30 (4): 1205–46.
18.
HarrisJohnChouYueh. 2001. Globalization or glocalization? Community care in Taiwan and Britain. European Journal of Social Work4 (2): 161–72.
19.
HutchinsonJudyLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2001. Choosing confrontation or consensus in the inner city: Lessons from a community-university partnership. Planning Theory and Practice2 (3): 293–310.
JelierRichard W.ClarkeRobert J.1999. “The Community as a Laboratory of Study: Getting out of the Ivory Tower.” Journal of Public Affairs Education5 (2): 167–80.
22.
KotvalZenia. 2003. Teaching experiential learning in the urban planning curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education27 (3): 297–308.
23.
LooyeJohanna W.SesayAbdul. 1998. Introducing diversity into the planning curriculum: A method for department-wide implementation. Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (2): 161–70.
MerrillSamuel B.2007. The status of teaching on voluntary methods of land use control in planning curricula. Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (3): 332–37. doi:10.1177/0739456X06297859
26.
NorthmoreSimonHart.Angie2011. Sustaining community-university partnerships. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research & Engagement4 (July): 1–11.
27.
O’LoughlinPauline.2013. Higher engagement and civic engagement: Comparative perspectives. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research & Engagement6 (July): 231–32.
ReardonKenneth M.2006. Promoting reciprocity within community/university development partnerships: Lessons from the field. Planning Practice and Research21 (1): 95–107.
30.
SchönDonald A.1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
31.
SheaJennifer. 2011. Sustainable engagement?Gateways: International Journal of Community Research & Engagement4 (July): 136–53.
32.
SilverChristopher.2014. Origins of planning education in the United States. Prepared for the International Planning History Society Conference, St. Augustine, Florida, 20–23 July.
33.
SlettoBjørn.2010. Educating reflective practitioners: Learning to embrace the unexpected through service learning. Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (4): 403–15.
34.
SmithZachary AFreemuthJohn C. 2007. Environmental politics and policy in the West. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
WetmoreLouis B.HeumannLeonard F.1988. The changing role of the workshop course in educating planning professionals. Journal of Planning Education and Research7 (3): 135–46.
37.
WiewelWimKnaap.Gerrit2005. Partnerships for smart growth: University-community collaboration for better public places. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
38.
WinklerTanja. 2013. At the Coalface community–university engagements and planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (2): 215–27.
39.
WoerkumCees vanAartsNoelleVan HerzeleAnn. 2011. Changed planning for planned and unplanned change. Planning Theory10 (2): 144–60.
