This article assesses the impact of postconstruction support (PCS) on the sustainability of participatory, demand-driven rural water projects in the Cuzco region of Peru. This study evaluates ninety-nine villages from two water supply schemes— projects built under a social investment fund program and those built under a nongovernmental program funded by the Swiss government. Overall, the study finds that the projects are performing very well. Multivariate regression analysis suggests that household- and village-level PCS is linked with financial performance, overall household satisfaction, and attitudes toward long-term future performance after controlling for project and community determinants of sustainability.
Black, Maggie.1998. Learning what works: A twenty year retrospective on international water and sanitation cooperation. Washington, DC: United National Development Programme, World Bank Water and Sanitation Program.
2.
Briscoe, J., M. Chakraborty, and S. Ahmed.1981. How Bengali villagers choose sources of domestic water. Water Supply Management5:165-81.
3.
Briscoe, J., P. F.de Castro, C.Griffin, J.North, and O. Olsen.1990. Toward equitable and sustainable rural water supplies: A contingent valuation study in Brazil. World Bank Economic Review4 (2): 115-34.
4.
Cairncross, Sandy, Ian Carruthers, Donald Curtis, Richard Feachem, David Bradley, and George Baldwin.1980. Evaluation for village water supply planning. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Feacham, R.G.1980. Community participation in appropriate water supply and sanitation technologies: The mythology for the decade. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 209:15-29.
6.
Gross, B., C. van Wijk, and N. Mukherjee.2001. Linking sustainability with demand, gender and poverty. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program.
7.
Isham, J., and S. Kahkonen.1999. Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India. College Park, MD: IRIS.
8.
———. 2002. Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India. Economic Development and Cultural Change50:667-91.
9.
Khawja, Asim Ijaz.2002. Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Collective action in public good provision. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Kleemeier, Elizabeth.2000. The impact of participation on sustainability: An analysis of the Malawi Rural Piped Water Scheme Program. World Development28 (5): 929-44.
11.
Lockwood, H.2003. Post-project sustainability: Follow-up support to communities. Unpublished manuscript (draft, 63 pp.), World Bank, Washington DC.
12.
Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao .2003. Evaluating community-based and community-driven development: A critical review of the evidence. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank . http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECAREGTOP-COMDRIDEV/Resources/DECstudy.pdf (accessed on November 8, 2007).
13.
Narayan, D.1995. The contribution of people's participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. Environmentally sustainable development occasional paper, series 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
14.
Oakley, P.1991. Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office.
15.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud.2000 . Evaluación global de los servicios de agua y saneamiento—2000. Informe analítico [Global evaluation of water and sanitation services—2000. Informal report]. Lima, Peru: Organizacion Panamerica de la Salid/ Oficina Regional de la Organization Mundial de la Salud.
16.
Prokopy, Linda Stalker.2004. Women's participation in rural water supply projects in India: Is it moving beyond tokenism and does it matter?Water Policy6:103-16.
17.
———. 2005. The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Development33 (11): 1801-19.
18.
Sara, Jennifer, and Travis Katz.1997. Making rural water supply sustainable: Recommendations from a global study. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Programme, Water and Sanitation Program .
19.
Schouten, Tom, and Patrick Moriarty.2003. Community water, community management: From system to service in rural areas. London : International Technology Development Group.
20.
Schumacher, E.F.1973. Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered . New York: Harper and Row.
21.
Sohail, M., M. Asce, S. Cavill, and A.P. Cotton.2005. Sustainable operation and maintenance of urban infrastructure: Myth or reality?Journal of Urban Planning and Development131 (1): 39-49.
22.
Tamayo, Gonzalo, Roxana Barrantes, ,Elena Conterno, and Alberto Bustamante .1999. Reform efforts and low-level equilibrium in the Peruvian water sector. In Spilled water: institutional commitment in the provision of water services, edited by William D. Savedoff and Pablo T. Spiller, 89-134. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
23.
Therkildsen, Ole.1988. Water white elephants? Lessons from donor funded planning and implementation of rural water supplies in Tanzania. Uppsala, Sweden: Scandinavian Institute for African Studies.
24.
Van Ryzin Gregg G.2004. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23 (3): 433-48.
25.
Water and Sanitation for Health Project.1994 . The sustainability of donor-assisted rural water supply projects . Water and Sanitation for Health Project technical report no. 94., April. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation for Health Project.
26.
Weinberger, K., and J.P. Jutting.2001. Determinants of participation in local development groups: Experiences from group based projects in Kashmir and Chad . Bonn, Germany: Center for Development Research.
27.
Whittington, Dale, Jennifer Davis, and Elizabeth McClelland.1998. Implementing a demand-driven approach to community water supply planning: A case study of Lugazi, Uganda . Water International23:134-45.
28.
World Bank Water Demand Research Team.1993 . The demand for water in rural areas: Determinants and policy implications. The World Bank Research Observer8 (1): 47-70.
29.
Who, Unicef.Global water supply and sanitation assessment 2000 report. 2000. Washington, DC: World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund.
