This paper investigates public attitudes toward types of war casualties. Through a survey experiment, we examine Taiwanese responses to hypothetical scenarios involving casualties among Taiwan's own military, the US military as allies, the Chinese military as enemy combatants, and mainland Chinese civilians. Our paper reveals three findings: first, there is a stronger aversion among Taiwanese citizens to their own military casualties compared with those of their allies. Second, Taiwanese attitudes toward their own military casualties are more adverse than those incurred by enemy military. Lastly, Taiwanese support for military action diminishes more significantly with Chinese civilian casualties than with Taiwanese military losses.
BrownR (2000) Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges.European Journal of Social Psychology30(6): 745–778.
2.
BruneauEKteilyN (2017) The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare.PLoS ONE12(7): e0181422.
3.
CancianMFCancianMHeginbothamE (2023) The First Battle of the Next War: Wargaming a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan.Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
4.
DillJSchubigerLI (2021) Attitudes toward the use of force: Instrumental imperatives, moral principles, and international law.American Journal of Political Science65(3): 612–633.
5.
DillJSaganSDValentinoB (2023) Inconstant care: Public attitudes towards force protection and civilian casualties in the United States, United Kingdom, and Israel.Journal of Conflict Resolution67(4): 587–616.
6.
EichenbergRC (2005) Victory has many friends: U.S. Public opinion and the use of military force, 1981–2005.International Security30(1): 140–177.
7.
GartnerSS (2008) The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach.American Political Science Review102(1): 95–106.
8.
GartnerSSSeguraGM (2021) Costly Calculations: A Theory of War, Casualties, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
GelpiCFeaverPDReiflerJ (2006) Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq.International Security30(3): 7–46.
10.
GelpiCFeaverPDReiflerJ, et al. (2009) Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
11.
HerrmannRKVossJFSchooler TonyaYE, et al. (1997) Images in international relations: An experimental test of cognitive schemata.International Studies Quarterly41(3): 403–433.
12.
JentlesonBW (1992) The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force.International Studies Quarterly36(1): 49–73.
13.
JohnsRDaviesGAM (2019) Civilian casualties and public support for military action: Experimental evidence.Journal of Conflict Resolution63(1): 251–281.
14.
KalinMSambanisN (2018) How to think about social identity.Annual Review of Political Science21(1): 239–257.
15.
LarsonE (1996) Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for U.S.Military Operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
LeidnerBCastanoEZaiserE, et al. (2010) Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(8): 1115–1129.
18.
MastroOS (2021) The Taiwan temptation: Why Beijing might resort to force.Foreign Affairs July/August.
19.
MercerJ (1995) Anarchy and identity.International Organization49(2): 229–252.
20.
MercerJ (1996) Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
MuellerJE (1973) War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
22.
MuellerJE (1985) War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
23.
OdellREHeginbothamE (2021) Strait of Emergency? Debating Beijing’s Threat to Taiwan.Foreign Affairs September/October.
24.
OttosenR (1995) Enemy images and the journalistic process.Journal of Peace Research32(1): 97–112.
25.
PinkerS (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.
26.
TajfelHBilligMGBundyRP, et al. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology1(2): 149–178.
27.
TirmanJ (2011) The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America’s Wars. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
TomzMWeeksJLP (2021) Military alliances and public support for war.International Studies Quarterly65(3): 811–824.
29.
WalshJI (2015) Precision weapons, civilian casualties, and support for the use of force.Political Psychology36(5): 507–523.
30.
WalzerM (2006) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th edn.New York: Basic Books.
31.
WangAH-EEldemerdashN (2023) National identity, willingness to fight, and collective action.Journal of Peace Research60(5): 745–759.
32.
WangAH-EWuCKSYehY-Y, et al. (2023) High-level visit and national security policy: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Taiwan.International Interactions49(1): 132–146.
33.
WuCKSChenF-YYehY-Y (2023) Public support for self-defence in Taiwan: The current state of research.Taiwan Politics.
34.
WuCKSHorng-En WangAYehY-Y, et al. (2024) Public support for the use of force in non-western and non-Major powers: The case of a China–Taiwan war.International Political Science Review45(1): 106–122.
