How do conciliatory and coercive counterinsurgency tactics affect militant group violence against civilians? Scholars of civil war increasingly seek to understand intentional civilian targeting, often referred to as terrorism. Extant research emphasizes group weakness, or general state attributes such as regime type. We focus on terrorism as violent communication and as a response to government actions. State tactics toward groups, carrots and sticks, should be important for explaining insurgent terror. We test the argument using new data on terrorism by insurgent groups, with many time-varying variables, covering 1998 through 2012. Results suggest government coercion against a group is associated with subsequent terrorism by that group. However, this is only the case for larger insurgent groups, which raises questions about the notion of terrorism as a weapon of the weak. Carrots are often negatively related to group terrorism. Other factors associated with insurgent terrorism include holding territory, ethnic motivation, and social service provision.
AsalVictor H.AckermanGaryKarl RethemeyerR.. 2012. “Connections Can Be Toxic: Terrorist Organizational Factors and the Pursuit of CBRN Weapons.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism35 (3): 229–54.
2.
AsalVictorDe la CalleLuisFindleyMichael G.YoungJoseph K.. 2012. “Killing Civilians or Holding Territory? How to Think about Terrorism.” International Studies Review14 (3): 475–97.
3.
AsalVictorPhillipsBrian J.. 2018. “What explains ethnic organizational violence? Evidence from Eastern Europe and Russia.” Conflict Management and Peace Science35 (2): 111–31.
4.
AsalVictorKarl RethemeyerR.. 2008. “The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks.” The Journal of Politics70 (2): 437–49.
5.
BaconTricia. 2014. “Alliance Hubs: Focal Points in the International Terrorist Landscape.” Perspectives on Terrorism8 (4): 4–26.
6.
BapatNavin A.2005. “Insurgency and the Opening of Peace Processes.” Journal of Peace Research42 (6): 699–717.
7.
BapatNavin A.2012. “Understanding State Sponsorship of Militant Groups.” British Journal of Political Science42 (1): 1–29.
BeckNathaniel. 2001. “Time-series-cross-section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science4 (1): 271–93.
10.
BellAndrewJonesKelvyn. 2015. “Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-series Cross-sectional and Panel Data.” Political Science Research and Methods3 (1): 133–53.
11.
BermanEli. 2009. Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
BermanEliMatanockAila. 2015. “The Empiricists’ Insurgency.” Annual Reviews of Political Science18:443–64.
13.
BloomMia. 2005. Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
BonacichPhillip. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology92 (5): 1170–82.
15.
BorgattiStephen P.CarleyKathleen M.KrackhardtDavid. 2006. “On the Robustness of Centrality Measures under Conditions of Imperfect Data.” Social Networks28:124–36.
16.
Bueno de MesquitaEthan. 2005. “Conciliation, Counterterrorism, and Patterns of Terrorist Violence.” International Organization59 (1): 145–76.
17.
Bueno de MesquitaEthanDicksonEric S.. 2007. “The Propaganda of the Deed: Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Mobilization.” American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 364–81.
18.
ConradJustinGreeneKevin. 2015. “Competition, Differentiation, and the Severity of Terrorist Attacks.” The Journal of Politics77 (02): 546–61.
19.
CrenshawMartha. 1981. “The Causes of Terrorism.” Comparative Politics13 (4): 379–99.
20.
CunninghamDavidEvertonSeanMurphyPhilip. 2016. Understanding Dark Networks: A Strategic Framework for the Use of Social Network Analysis. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
CunninghamDavidGleditschKristianSalehyanIdean. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome?” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 570–97.
22.
CunninghamKathleen G.2011. “Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists?” American Political Science Review105 (2): 275–97.
23.
DaxeckerUrsula E.HessMichael L.. 2013. “Repression Hurts: Coercive Government Responses and the Demise of Terrorist Campaigns.” British Journal of Political Science43 (3): 559–77.
24.
DuganLauraChenowethErica. 2012. “Moving Beyond Deterrence: The Effectiveness of Raising the Expected Utility of Abstaining from Terrorism in Israel.” American Sociological Review77 (4): 597–624.
25.
EckKristineHultmanLisa. 2007. “One-sided Violence against Civilians in War: Insights from New Fatality Data.” Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 233–46.
26.
EndersWalterSandlerTodd. 2011. The Political Economy of Terrorism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war.” American political science review97 (1): 75–90.
28.
FindleyMichael G.YoungJoseph K.. 2012. “Terrorism and Civil War: A Spatial and Temporal Approach to a Conceptual Problem.” Perspectives on Politics10 (02): 285–305.
29.
FindleyMichael G.YoungJoseph K.. 2015. “Terrorism, Spoiling, and the Resolution of Civil Wars.” The Journal of Politics77 (4): 1115–28.
30.
FlaniganShawn Teresa. 2008. “Nonprofit Service Provision by Insurgent Organizations: The Cases of Hizballah and the Tamil Tigers.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism31 (6): 499–519.
31.
FortnaVirginia Paige. 2015. “Do Terrorists Win? Rebels’ Use of Terrorism and Civil War Outcomes.” International Organizations69 (3): 519–56.
32.
GranovetterMark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91 (3): 481–510.
GoodwinJeff. 2006. “A Theory of Categorical Terrorism.” Social Forces84 (4): 2027–46.
35.
HendrixCullen S.YoungJoseph K.. 2014. “State Capacity and Terrorism: A Two-dimensional Approach.” Security Studies23 (2): 329–63.
36.
HorowitzM. C.PotterPhilip B. K.. 2014. “Allying to Kill: Terrorist Intergroup Cooperation and the Consequences for Lethality.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (2): 199–225.
37.
HultmanLisa. 2007. “Battle Losses and Rebel Violence: Raising the Costs for Fighting.” Terrorism and Political Violence19 (2): 205–22.
38.
HultmanLisa. 2012. “Attacks on Civilians in Civil War: Targeting the Achilles Heel of Democratic Governments.” International Interactions38 (2): 164–81.
39.
JohnstonPatrick B.2012. “Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns.” International Security36 (4): 47–79.
40.
JonesSeth G.LibickiMartin C.. 2008. How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering Al Qa’ida. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
41.
JordanJenna. 2014. “Attacking the Leader, Missing the Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes.” International Security38 (4): 7–38.
42.
KalyvasStathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
KyddAndrewWalterBarbara F.. 2002. “Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence.” International Organization56 (2): 263–96.
44.
KyddAndrewWalterBarbara. 2006. “The Strategies of Terrorism.” International Security31 (1): 49–80.
45.
LakeDavid A.2002. “Rational Extremism: Understanding Terrorism in the Twenty-first Century.” Dialogue IO1 (01): 15–29.
46.
LapanH. E.SandlerTodd. 1993. “Terrorism and Signaling.” European Journal of Political Economy9 (3): 383–97.
47.
LiQuan. 2005. “Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents?” Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 278–97.
48.
LyallJason. 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (3): 331–62.
49.
MampillyZachariah C.2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
MetelitsClaire. 2009. Inside Insurgency: Violence, Civilians, and Rebel Group Behavior. New York: NYU Press.
51.
MooreWill H.1998. “Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing.” American Journal of Political Science42:851–73.
52.
MooreWill H.2000. “The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (1): 107–27.
53.
NemethStephen. 2013. “The Effect of Competition on Terrorist Group Operations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (2): 336–62.
54.
PaulChristopherClarkeColin P.GrillBeth. 2010. Victory has a Thousand Fathers: Sources of Success in Counterinsurgency. Santa Monica, MD: Rand.
55.
PhillipsBrian J.2014. “Terrorist Group Cooperation and Longevity.” International Studies Quarterly58 (2): 336–47.
56.
PhillipsBrian J.2015. “Enemies with Benefits? Violent Rivalry and Terrorist Group Longevity.” Journal of Peace Research52 (1): 62–75.
57.
PiazzaJames A.WalshJames Igoe. 2009. “Transnational Terror and Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly53 (1): 125–48.
58.
PoloSara M. T.GleditschKristian Skrede. 2016. “Twisting Arms and Sending Messages: Terrorist Tactics in Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research53 (6): 815–29.
59.
RaslerKaren. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review61 (1): 132–52.
60.
RitterEmily HenckenConradCourtenay R.. 2016. “Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression.” American Political Science Review110 (1): 85–99.
61.
SalehyanIdeanSirokyDavidWoodReed M.. 2014. “External Rebel Sponsorship and Civilian Abuse: A Principal-agent Analysis of Wartime Atrocities.” International Organization68 (03): 633–61.
62.
SchmidAlex P.GraafJanny De. 1982. Violence as Communication: Insurgent Terrorism and the Western News Media. London, UK: Sage.
63.
SiqueiraKevinSandlerTodd. 2006. “Terrorists versus the Government Strategic Interaction, Support, and Sponsorship.” Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (6): 878–98.
64.
StantonJessica. 2013. “Terrorism in the Context of Civil War.” Journal of Politics75 (4): 1009–22.
65.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoKhomenkoAnnaSvenssonRichard. 2016. “The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan16.” University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Accessed December 30, 2016. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se.doi:10.18157/QoGStdJan16.
66.
ThomasJakana. 2014. “Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 804–18.
67.
UCDP (Uppsala Conflict Data Program)Battle-Related Deaths Dataset v.5-2016, Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Accessed May 7, 2017. http://www.ucdp.uu.se, Uppsala University.
68.
WalshJames I.PiazzaJames A.. 2010. “Why Respecting Physical Integrity Rights Reduces Terrorism.” Comparative Political Studies43 (5): 551–77.
69.
WalterBarbara F.2006. “Information, Uncertainty, and the Decision to Secede.” International Organization60 (1): 105–35.
70.
WeinsteinJeremy M.2006. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
71.
WoodReed M.2010. “Rebel Capability and Strategic Violence Against Civilians.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 601–14.
72.
WoodReed M.KathmanJacob D.. 2015. “Competing for the Crown: Inter-rebel Competition and Civilian Targeting in Civil War.” Political Research Quarterly68 (1): 167–79.
73.
YoungJoseph K.2013. “Repression, Dissent, and the Onset of Civil War.” Political Research Quarterly66 (3): 516–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
