The climate of impunity in many post-civil conflict societies results in unprecedented levels of violence against women, making legal implementation and law enforcement particularly difficult. We argue that the presence of strong legal provisions mediates the negative influence of the post-civil conflict environment on violence against women. Specifically, we examine the role of strong legal protections on the enforcement of sexual violence legislation in post-civil conflict countries. To examine our hypothesis, we utilize an original dataset measuring the strength and enforcement of domestic legal statutes addressing violence against women for the years 2007–2010 in post-civil conflict countries. We find elements of civil conflict as well as domestic and international legal regimes to be reliably associated with the enforcement of violence against women laws and rape prevalence in post-civil conflict states.
BastickMGrimmKKunzR (2007) Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict: Global Overview and Implications for the Security Sector. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
3.
BeerC (2009) Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development44: 212–227.
4.
BerryME (2015) From violence to mobilization: Women, war, and threat in Rwanda. An International Quarterly20(2): 135–156.
5.
BlumbergR (2001) Risky business: What happens to gender equality and women’s rights in post-conflict societies? Insights from NGOS in El Salvador. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society15(1): 161–173.
6.
BoestenJ (2010) Analyzing rape regimes at the interface of war and peace in Peru. International Journal of Transitional Justice4(1): 110–129.
7.
ChinkinC (2008) The Protection of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights Post-Conflict. Geneva: United Nations Commission on Human Rights Gender Unit.
8.
CollierPElliotLHegreHHoefflerARenal-QuerolMSambanisN (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CollierPHoeflerASöderbomM (2008) Post-conflict risks. Journal of Peace Research45(4): 461–478.
10.
ConradCRHencken RitterE (2013) Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. Journal of Politics5(2): 397–409.
11.
CordellK (2010) Gender Mainstreaming in Peacekeeping Operations: Liberia 2003–2009. New York: United Nations Office of the Gender Adviser.
12.
DevlinCElgieR (2008) The effect of increased women’s representation in parliament: The case of Rwanda. Parliamentary Affairs62(2): 237–254.
13.
DoyleMSambanisN (2002) International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review94: 779–801.
14.
FuruokaF (2009) Looking for a J-shaped development–fertility relationship: Do advances in development really reverse fertility decisions. Economics Bulletin29(4): 3067–3074.
15.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
16.
GoodmanRJinksD (2013) Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Hafner-BurtonETsutsuiK (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology110(5): 1373–1411.
18.
HendrixCS (2010) Measuring state capacity: Theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research47(3): 273–285.
19.
HughesMM (2009) Armed conflict, international linkages, and women’s parliamentary representation in developing nations. Social Problems56(1): 174–204.
KeithLCTateCNPoeSC (2009) Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse?Journal of Politics71(2): 644–660.
22.
KerstenJ (1996) Culture, masculinities and violence against women. British Journal of Criminology36(3): 381–395.
23.
LeibyMØstbyGNordåsR (2015) The legacy of war: Intimate-partner violence in Peru, 1980–2009. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 3–6 September, San Francisco, CA.
24.
LiQWenM (2005) The immediate and lingering effects of armed conflict on adult mortality: A time-series cross-national analysis. Journal of Peace Research42(4): 471–492.
25.
LongSJFreeseJ (2014) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
26.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
27.
Ní AoláinFHayesDFCahnN (2011) On the Frontlines: Gender, War, and the Post-conflict Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
NorrisP (1996) Mobilizing the women’s vote: The gender-generation gap in voting behavior. Parliamentary Affairs49(2): 333–342.
29.
PatrickE (2006) Finding Trees in the Desert: Firewood Collection and Alternatives in Darfur. New York: Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children
30.
PetterssonTWallensteenP (2015) Armed conflicts, 1946–2014. Journal of Peace Research52(4): 536–550.
31.
PlümperTNeumayerE (2006) The unequal burden of war: The effect of armed conflict on the gender gap in life expectancy. International Organization60(3): 723–754.
32.
PollakR (2004) An intergenerational model of domestic violence. Journal of Population Economics17(2): 311–329.
33.
PowellEStatonJK (2009) Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly53(1): 149–174.
34.
RichardsDLHaglundJ (2015) Violence against Women and the Law. Boulder, CO: Routledge-Paradigm.
35.
SchuldM (2013) The prevalence of violence in post-conflict societies: A case study of Kwazulu–Natal, South Africa. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development8(1): 60–73.
36.
SchulerSRBatesLMFarzanaI (2008) Women’s rights, domestic violence, and recourse seeking in rural Bangladesh. Violence Against Women14(3): 326–345.
37.
ShayneJD (2004) The Revolution Question: Feminisms in El Salvador, Chile, and Cuba. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38.
SimmonsB (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SorensenB (1998) Women and Post-conflict Reconstruction: Issues and Sources. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
40.
ThomasS (1991) The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics53(4): 958–976.
41.
TrueJ (2012) The Political Economy of Violence against Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
WalterBF (2004) Does conflict beget conflict? Explaining recurring civil war. Journal of Peace Research41(3): 371–388.
43.
WalterBF (2009) Bargaining failures and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science12(1): 243–261.
44.
WilliamsJ (2012) Devastating remnants of war: The impact of armed conflict on women and girls. In: WordenM (ed.), The Unfinished Revolution: Voices from the Global Fight for Women’s Rights. New York: Seven Stories Press, pp. 109–116.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
