Considerable resources are devoted to ex-combatant reintegration programs in current peace processes, but evidence on their effectiveness remains thin. We use original survey data to study an ex-combatant reintegration program implemented after Burundi's 1993-2004 civil war. Previous quantitative studies have found reintegration programs to be ineffective, but only ex-combatants who self-selected into programs were studied. We avoid such selection problems with a quasi-experimental design exploiting an exogenous bureaucratic failure. We find the program resulted in a 20 to 35 percentage point reduction in poverty incidence among ex-combatants and moderate improvement in livelihoods. But this economic boost does not seem to have caused political reintegration: while we find a modest increase in propensities to report civilian life as preferable to combatant life, we find no evidence that the program contributed to either more satisfaction with the peace process or a more positive disposition toward current government institutions.
AbadieAlbertoImbensGuido W.. 2008. “On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators.”Econometrica76 (6): 1537–57.
2.
AldenChristopher. 2002. “Making Old Soldiers Fade Away: Lessons from the Reintegration of Demobilized Soldiers in Mozambique.”Security Dialogue33 (3): 341–56.
AnnanJeanniePatelAnna C.2009. Critical Issues and Lessons in Social Reintegration: Balancing Justice, Psychological Well Being, and Community Reconciliation. Paper presented to the First International Congress on Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration. Cartegena, May 4-6, 2009.
5.
BaareAnton K. G.2006. An Analysis of Transitional Economic Reintegration. Sweden: Swedish Initiative for Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (SIDDR), Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
6.
Boutros-GhaliBoutros. 1992. An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.
7.
BrydenAlanHanggiHeiner, eds. 2005. Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. New Brunswick, NY: Transaction.
8.
CastilloGraciano Del. 2008. Rebuilding War-Torn States: The Challenges of Post-Conflict Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
CNDRR (National Commission for Demobilization, Reinsertion and Reintegration). 2005. Ganuka: Lettre d’information1, January, 2005.
10.
CollettaNatKostnerMarkusWeidehoferIngo. 1996. The Transition from War to Peace in Sub-Sahara Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
11.
CollierPaul. 1994. “Demobilization and Insecurity: A Study in the Economics of the Transition from War to Peace.”Journal of International Development6 (3): 343–51.
12.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.”Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563–95.
13.
CousensElisabeth M.KumarChetanWermesterKarin. 2001. Peacebuilding as Politics: Cultivating Peace in Fragile Societies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
14.
DehejiaRajeevWahbaSadek. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.”Journal of the American Statistical Association94 (448): 1053–62.
15.
DiNardoJohnLeeDavid S.2010. “Program Evaluation and Research Designs.” National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper16016.
16.
DoyleMichaelSambanisNicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
FeilScott. 2004. “Laying the Foundations: Enhancing Security Capabilities.” In Winning the Peace: An American Strategy for Post-Conflict Reconstruction, edited by R. COrr., Pp. 39-57. Washington, DC: The Center for Strategic and International Studies.
18.
FortnaVirginia Page. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
GeenenSara. 2007. Former Combatants at the Crossing: How to Assess the Reintegration of Former Combatants in the Security and Development Nexus? Case Study: Ruyigi (Burundi) and Kinshasa (DRC). Unpublished Manuscript. University of Antwerp.
20.
Government of Sweden. 2006. Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament Demobilization and Reintegration. Accessed April 15, 2011, http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/4890.
21.
GreenDonald P.HaShange E.BullockJohn G.. 2010. “Enough Already about ‘Black Box’ Experiments: Studying Mediation is More Difficult than Most Scholars Suppose.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science628 (1): 200–8.
22.
HansonStephanie. 2007. Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) in Africa. Backgrounder. Accessed April 15, 2011. http://www.cfr.org/publication/12650/.
23.
HoDaniel. E.ImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.”Political Analysis15:199–236.
24.
HumphreysMacartanWeinsteinJeremy. 2007. “Demobilization and Reintegration.”Journal of Conflict Resolution51 (4): 531–67.
25.
JenningsKathleen M.2007. “The Struggle to Satisfy: DDR through the Eyes of Ex-combatants in Liberia.”International Peacekeeping14 (2): 1–15.
26.
JenningsKathleen M.2008. “Unclear Ends, Unclear Means: Reintegration in Postwar Societies—The Case of Liberia.”Global Governance14:327–45.
27.
KingGaryHonakerJamesJosephAnneScheveKenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95(1): 49–69.
28.
KingmaKees. 1997. “Demobilization of Combatants after Civil Wars in Africa and their Reintegration into Civilian Life.”Policy Sciences30 (3): 151–66.
29.
KoenkerRogerHallockKevin F.Quantile Regression: An Introduction [Long Version]. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigne.
30.
KornEdward L.GraubardBarry I.1999. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
KumarKrishna, ed. 1997. Rebuilding Societies After Civil War: Critical Roles for International Assistance. Boulder. CO: Lynne Rienner.
32.
LevelyIan. 2010. “Disarmament, Demobilization, Reinsertion and Reintegration in Post-war Liberia: A Failed Approach or Simply a Failed Program?”Typescript, Charles University, Prague.
33.
LittleRoderick J.A.RubinDonald B.2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York, NY: Wiley.
34.
McMullinJaremey. 2004. “Reintegration of Combatants: Were the Right Lessons Learned in Mozambique?”International Peacekeeping11 (4): 625–43.
MuggahRobert. 2005. “No Magic Bullet: A Critical Perspective on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) and Weapons Reduction in Post-conflict Contexts.”Round Table379:239–52.
37.
MuggahRobert. 2009. Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the Aftermanth of War. New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
PaesWolf-Christian. 2005. “Eyewitness: The Challenges of Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration in Liberia.”International Peacekeeping12 (2): 253–61.
39.
ParisRoland. 2004. At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PoulignyBeatrice. 2004. The Politics and Anti-Politics of Contemporary Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Programs. Paris: CERI/SGDN.
41.
PugelJames. 2009. “Measuring Reintegration in Liberia: Assessing the Gap between Outputs and Outcomes.” In MuggahRobert (Ed.), Security and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Dealing with Fighters in the Aftermath of War. New York: Routledge, 70–102.
42.
RenoWillam. 1999. Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
43.
RubinDonald B.1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
44.
RubinDonald B.2003. Identifying Options and Entry Points for Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration in Afghanistan. New York: Center on International Cooperation.
45.
SamiiCyrus. 2011. “Missing Data.” In BadieBertrandBerg-SchlosserDirkMolinoLeonardo., International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
46.
SekhonJasjeet S.2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.”Annual Review of Political Science12:487–508.
47.
Smith JeffreyA.ToddPetra E.. 2005. “Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?”Journal of Econometrics125 (1-2): 305–53.
48.
SoderstromJohanna. 2010. Reintegrating Ex-combatants in Liberia—An Opportunity for Democracy?Unpublished thesis, Uppsala University.
49.
SpearJoanna. 2002. “Disarmament and Demobilization.” In Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements, edited by StedmanS. J.RothchildD.CousensE. M., Pp.141–182. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
50.
SpearJoanna. 2006. “From Political Economies of War to Political Economies of Peace: The Contribution of DDR after Wars of Predation.”Contemporary Security Policy27 (1): 168–89.
51.
SpeckerLeontine. 2008. The R-Phase of DDR processes. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael ’ Conflict Research Unit.
52.
TajimaYuhki. 2009. Background Paper on Economic Reintegration. Prepared for the First International Congress on Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration, Cartagena.
53.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2000. Sharing Ground in Post-Conflict Situations: The Role of UNDP in Support of Reintegration Programmes. New York: UNDP.
54.
United Nations. 2000. The Role of United Nations Peacekeeping in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration. Report of the Secretary-General to the Security Council, S/2000/101. New York: United Nations.
55.
United Nations. 2010. Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards. Accessed April 15, 2011, http://www.unddr.org/iddrs/.
56.
UvinPeter. 2007. Ex-combatants in Burundi: Why They Joined, Why They Left, How They Fared. Washington, DC: Multi-country Demobilization and Reintegration Program/World Bank.
57.
WalterBarbara. 2001. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
58.
World Bank. 2002. Greater Great Lakes Regional Strategy for Demobilization and Reintegration. Report No. 238669-AFR. Washington, DC: World Bank and MDRP Secretariat.
59.
World Bank. 2004a. Position Paper: Targeting MDRP Assistance: Ex-Combatants and Other War-Affected Populations. Washington, DC: World Bank.
60.
World Bank. 2004b. Technical Annex for a Proposed Grant of SDR 22.2 Million to the Republic of Burundi for an Emergency Demobilization, Reinsertion and Reintegration Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
