The decision by ethnic minority organizations (EMOs) to form militias is heavily influenced by the specific policies that governments adopt towards them. We theorize that, when a government makes an EMO illegal or subjects it to repression, those actions substantially increase the EMO s incentives to invest in creating an institutionalized capacity for violence. We test our theory via a quantitative analysis of militia formation using a sample population of 261 EMOs within transitioning and post-communist Eurasian countries from 1989 to 2006. Our results indicate that EMOs are far more likely to form militias if they have been repressed and/or made illegal by their governments.
AbrahamsF (1996) Human Rights in Post-Communist Albania. New York City: Human Rights Watch.
2.
Agence France Presse (1999) Tatarstan calls for fighters to aid Kosovo Albanians, April 2005.
3.
AndersonL (1987) The state in the Middle East and North Africa. Comparative Politics20(1): 1–18.
4.
AsalVPateAWilkenfeldJ (2008) Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior (MAROB) Middle East Codebook. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
5.
AsalVPateAWilkenfeldJ (2012) Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior (MAROB) Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union Data Set. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
6.
AsalVConradJWhiteP (2014a) Going abroad: Transnational solicitation and contention by ethnopolitical organizations. International Organization68(4): 945–978.
7.
AsalVSchulzkeMPateA (2014b) Why do some organizations kill while others do not: An examination of Middle Eastern organizations. Foreign Policy Analysis; doi: 10.1111/fpa.12080
8.
BanaszakLA (1996) Why Movements Succeed or Fail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BermanE (2009) Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press
10.
BermanELaitinDD (2008) Religion, terrorism, and public goods: Testing the club model. Journal of Public Economics92(10–11): 1942–1967.
11.
BloomM (2005) Dying to Kill. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Box-SteffensmeierJJonesB (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BuhaugHGleditschKS (2008) Contagion or confusion? Why conflicts cluster in space. International Studies Quarterly52: 215–233.
14.
BymanD (2005) Deadly Connections: States that Sponsor Terrorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BymanDChalkPHoffmanBRosenauWBrannanD (2001) Trends in Outside Support for Insurgent Movements. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16.
CarterDSignorinoC (2010) Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
17.
CedermanLWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel?: New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
18.
CedermanLWeidmannNBGleditschKS (2011) Horizontal inequalities and ethnonationalist civil war: A global comparison. American Political Science Review105(3): 478–495.
19.
ChenowethEStephanMJ (2011) Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
ChermakSFreilichJSuttmoellerM (2013) The organizational dynamics of far-right hate groups in the United States: Comparing violent to nonviolent organizations. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism36(3): 193–218.
21.
CollierP (2000) Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and their Implications for Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 563–595.
23.
CollierPHoefflerARohnerD (2009) Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers61(1): 1–27.
24.
CoppieterB (2004) Secession and war: A moral analysis of the Russian–Chechen conflict. Central Asian Survey22(4): 377–404.
25.
CrenshawM (1981) The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics13(4): 379–399.
26.
CunninghamKG (2013) Understanding strategic choice: The determinants of civil war and nonviolent campaign in self-determination disputes. Journal of Peace Research50(3): 291–304.
27.
DavenportC (2007) State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science10: 1–23.
28.
Della PortaD (1995) Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
EarlJ (2003) Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory21(1): 44–68.
30.
EarlyBR (2006) “Larger than a party, yet smaller than a state”: Locating Hezbollah’s place within Lebanon’s state and society. World Affairs168(3): 115–128.
31.
EdelmanLBSuchmanMC (1997) The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology23: 479–515.
32.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
33.
GermanTC (2003) Russia’s Chechen War. New York: Routledge.
GorenburgDP (2003) Minority Ethnic Mobilization in the Russian Federation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GurrT (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
GurrT (2000) People Versus States. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.
38.
HabermasJCroninC (1998) The European nation-state: On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship. Public Culture10(2): 397–416.
39.
HendersonCW (1991) Conditions affecting the use of political repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (1): 120–142.
40.
HoffmanB (1999) Terrorism trends and prospects. In: LesserIArquillaJHoffmanBRonfeldtDFZaniniM (eds) Countering the New Terrorism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, pp. 7–38
41.
HuthPKAlleeTL (2002) The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
JonesJW (2008) Blood that Cries out from the Earth: The Psychology of Religious Terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
JuergensmeyerM (2003) Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
KingGZengL (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9(2): 137–163.
45.
KingGRobertsM (2015) How robust standard errors expose methodological problems they do not fix, and what to do about it. Political Analysis32(2): 159–179.
46.
LawrenceA (2010) Nationalist violence: Competition and conflict in uprisings against colonial rule. International Security25(2): 88–122.
47.
LiQ (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents. Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 278–297.
48.
LichbachMI (1998) The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49.
LievenA (1998) Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2008) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2008. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. Available at: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm
51.
MigdalJ (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State–Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
PerligerAWeinbergL (2003) Jewish self-defence and terrorist groups prior to the establishment of the state of Israel: Roots and traditions. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions4(3): 91–118.
54.
PiazzaJA (2006) Rooted in poverty?: Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages. Terrorism and Political Violence18(1): 159–177.
55.
PorterD (1999) Health, Civilization, and the State: A History of Public Health from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: Psychology Press.
56.
RaslerK (1996) Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review61: 132–152.
57.
RaslerKAThompsonWR (1985) War making and state making: Governmental expenditures, tax revenues, and global wars. The American Political Science Review491–507.
58.
ReganPNortonD (2005) Greed, grievance, and mobilization in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(3): 319–336.
59.
RussettB (1990) A more democratic and therefore more peaceful world. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution29(4): 243–263.
60.
Sánchez-CuencaIDe la CalleL (2009) Domestic terrorism: The hidden side of political violence. Annual Review of Political Science12 (2009): 31–49.
61.
SmithAD (2003) Nationalism and Modernism. New York: Routledge
62.
SmithB (2013) Separatist conflict in the former Soviet Union and beyond: How different was Communism?World Politics65(2): 350–381.
63.
StanilandP (2012) States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics10(2): 243–264.
64.
SternJ (2003) The protean enemy. Foreign Affairs82(4): 27–40.
65.
StohlMS (2006) Counterterrorism and repression. In:The Roots of Terrorism. New York: Routledge, pp. 57–70.
66.
TarziSM (2005) Coercive diplomacy and an “irrational” regime: Understanding the American confrontation with the Taliban. International Studies42(1): 21–41.
67.
TillyC (2003) The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van de VoordeC (2005) Sri Lankan terrorism: Assessing and responding to the threat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Police Practice and Research6(2): 181–199.
70.
WeidmannNBRødJKCedermanL (2010) Representing ethnic groups in space: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(4): 491–499.
71.
WeinsteinJ (2006) Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72.
WilkinsonP (2001) Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response. London: Taylor & Francis.
73.
ZimmermannE (1987) Political violence and other strategies of opposition movements: A look at some recent evidence. Journal of International Affairs40(2): 325–351.
74.
ZornC (2005) A solution to separation in binary response models. Political Analysis13(2): 157–170.
