The article debunks the conception that peace agreements are all equal. Distinct from the conventional monocausal assessment, I view the peace agreement as a cohesive whole and evaluate its strength in terms of its structural and procedural provisions. I use data on the length of intrastate peace episodes during the period from 1946 to 2010. My key finding is that the design quality of the peace agreement has a significant impact on the durability of peace. Agreements that are carefully designed to deal with all obstacles to cooperation have the strongest pacifying effect among armed conflict outcomes. The article sets forth ways to sharpen the performance of conflict management operations in war-torn countries.
AalenO (1978) Nonparametric inference for a family of counting process. Annals of Statistics6(4): 701–726.
2.
AbbottKSnidalD (2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization54(3): 421–456.
3.
AbbottKKeohaneRMoravcsikASlaughterA-MSnidalD (2000) The concept of legalization. International Organization54(3): 401–419.
4.
BellC (2008) On the Law of Peace: Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BellCO’RourkeC (2009) The Transitional Justice Peace Agreements Database. University of Ulster. Available at: http://www.peaceagreements.ulster.ac.uk (accessed 1 October 2010).
6.
BoehmkeFJMoreyDSShannonM (2006) Selection bias and continuous-time duration models: Consequences and a proposed solution. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 192–207.
7.
ChayesAChayesA (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DerouenKJRLeaJWallensteenP (2009) The duration of civil war peace agreements. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(4): 367–387.
10.
DixonWJ (1993) Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution37(1): 42–68.
11.
DownsGWRockeDMBarsoomPN (1996) Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?International Organization50(3): 379–406.
12.
FearonJ (1998) Bargaining, enforcement and international cooperation. International Organization52(2): 269–305.
13.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict, 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
14.
GursesMRostNMcLeodP (2008) Mediating civil war settlements and the duration of peace. International Interactions34(2): 129–155.
15.
HarbomLWallensteenP (2009) Armed conflict, 1946–2008. Journal of Peace Research46(4): 577–587.
16.
HarbomLHögbladhSWallensteenP (2006) Armed conflict and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research43(5): 617–631.
17.
HarbomLMelanderEWallensteenP (2008) Dyadic dimensions of armed conflict, 1946–2007. Journal of Peace Research45(5): 697–710.
18.
HartzellCHoddieM (2007) Crafting Peace: Power Sharing Institutions and the Negotiated Settlement of Civil Wars. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
19.
HartzellCHoddieMRothchildD (2001) Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization55(1): 183–208.
20.
HegreHEllingsenTGatesSGleditschNP (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review95(1): 33–48.
21.
HenselPR (2000) Theory and evidence on geography and conflict. In: VasquezJ (ed.) What Do We Know about War?New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 57–84.
JarstadAKNilssonD (2008) From words to deeds: The implementation of power-sharing pacts in peace accords. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(3): 206–223.
24.
KalyvasSBalcellsL (2010) International system technologies and rebellion: How the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. American Political Science Review104(3): 415–429.
25.
KreutzJ (2010) How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 243–250.
26.
LacinaBGleditschNP (2005) Monitoring trends in global combat: A new dataset of battle deaths. European Journal of Population21(2–3): 145–166.
27.
LakeDRothchildD (2005) Territorial decentralization and civil war settlements. In: RoederPRothchildD (ed.) Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 109–132.
28.
LickliderR (1995) The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993. American Political Science Review89(3): 681–690.
29.
MaozZ (1984) Peace by empire? Conflict outcomes and international stability, 1816–1976. Journal of Peace Research21(3): 227–241.
30.
MarshallMGurrTJaggersK (2010) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions: 1800–2009. Version p4v2009. Center for Systemic Peace. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed 10 October 2010).
31.
MasonTDGursesMBrandtPTQuinnJM (2011) When civil wars recur: Conditions for durable peace after civil wars. International Studies Perspectives12(2): 171–189.
32.
MattesMSavunB (2007) The optimal design of civil war settlements: Insights from bargaining theory. Paper presented at the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, Chicago, IL.
33.
MattesMSavunB (2010) Information, agreement design and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 511–524.
34.
NelsonW (1972) Theory and application of hazard plotting for censored failure data. Technometrics14(4): 945–966.
35.
OuelletJ (2004) Structural components of peace agreements, and procedural components of peace agreements. In: BurgessGBurgessH (eds) Beyond Intractability. Boulder, CO: Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado. Available at: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/substantive_provisions (accessed 5 May 2009).
36.
QuinnJMMasonDGursesM (2007) Sustaining the peace: Determinants of civil war recurrence. International Interactions33(2): 167–193.
37.
SimmonsBHopkinsD (2005) The constraining power of international treaties: Theory and methods. American Political Science Review99(4): 623–630.
38.
United Nations Department of Political Affairs (2010) Peace Agreements Database. Available at: http://peacemaker.unlb.org (accessed 27 September 2010).
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2010) UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia. Uppsala University. Available at: http://www.ucdp.uu.se/database (accessed 5 September 2010).
41.
WagnerH (1993) The causes of peace. In: LickliderR (ed.) Stopping the Killing: How Civil Wars End. New York: New York University Press, pp. 235–268.
42.
WalterB (2002) Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
