Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The past decades saw a growing body of review studies on virtual reality (VR) in education. However, there is a lack of synthesis of the evidence to inform educational practices and research. This umbrella review draws evidence from existing literature to examine the constraints, implications, and research agendas of VR in education. Altogether, 83 articles consisting of 63 systematic reviews, 15 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 5 meta-analyses were identified from three databases (i.e., Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore). Through thematic analysis, six key areas of challenges were noted for the use of VR in education, including technological, psychological, pedagogical/theoretical, financial, measurement, and various other issues. Additionally, several theoretical recommendations and practical guidelines were identified to inform instructors, VR designers and developers, and policymakers. Future research involved advancing theoretical development, improving the methodological approaches of current research (i.e., research design and measurements), and exploring emerging issues (e.g., transfer of learning and VR’s impact on learners’ physical and mental health) in educational VR research.

Keywords

virtual reality umbrella review constraints research agendas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

J. R.

Chu

M. M. H.

Jeyarajah

Isba

Payton

McGrath

Tolley

Bruce

(2023). Virtual reality in simulation-based emergency skills training: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Resuscitation Plus, 16, Article 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100484

Abdelhameed

W. A.

(2013). Virtual reality use in architectural design studios: A case of studying structure and construction. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.027

Abich

Parker

Murphy

J. S.

Eudy

(2021). A review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality, 25(4), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00498-8

Acevedo

Magana

A. J.

Benes

Mousas

(2024). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality in STEM education: Advantages and disadvantages on learning and user experience. IEEE Access, 12, 189359–189386. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3489233

Algarni

Y. A.

Saini

R. S.

Vaddamanu

S. K.

Quadri

S. A.

Gurumurthy

Vyas

Baba

S. M.

Avetisyan

Mosaddad

S. A.

Heboyan

(2024). The impact of virtual reality simulation on dental education: A systematic review of learning outcomes and student engagement. Journal of Dental Education, 88(11), 1549–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13619

Aromataris

Fernandez

Godfrey

C. M.

Holly

Khalil

Tungpunkom

(2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct, and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055

Atal

Admiraal

Saab

(2023). 360° video in teacher education: A systematic review of why and how it is used in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, Article 104349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104349

Bada

S. O.

Olusegun

(2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104349

Bahari

(2022). Affordances and challenges of teaching language skills by virtual reality: A systematic review (2010–2020). E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211036583

10.

Bandura

(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

11.

Barreda-Ángeles

Aleix-Guillaume

Pereda-Baños

(2021). Virtual reality storytelling as a double-edged sword: Immersive presentation of nonfiction 360°-video is associated with impaired cognitive information processing. Communication Monographs, 88(2), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1803496

12.

Barreda-Ángeles

Hartmann

(2022). Psychological benefits of using social virtual reality platforms during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of social and spatial presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, Article 107047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107047

13.

Beck

(2019). Special issue: Augmented and virtual reality in education: Immersive learning research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854035

14.

Berns

Reyes Sánchez

(2020). A review of virtual reality-based language learning apps. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27486

15.

Borona

Tambouris

Tarabanis

(2018). The use of 3D multi-user virtual environments in computer assisted second language learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(3), 249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2018.095963

16.

Borrego

Latorre

Alcañiz

Llorens

(2018). Comparison of oculus rift and HTC vive: Feasibility for virtual reality-based exploration, navigation, exergaming, and rehabilitation. Games for Health Journal, 7(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0114

17.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

18.

Bricken

(1991). Virtual reality learning environments: Potentials and challenges. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 25(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/126640.126657

19.

Cabrera-Duffaut

Pinto-Llorente

A. M.

Iglesias-Rodríguez

(2024). Immersive learning platforms: Analyzing virtual reality contribution to competence development in higher education—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1391560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391560

20.

Cai

Gui

Mao

Wang

Hao

Fan

Tai

R. H.

(2023). The effect of feedback on academic achievement in technology-rich learning environments (TREs): A meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 39, Article 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100521

21.

Calvert

Hume

(2022). Immersing learners in stories: A systematic literature review of educational narratives in virtual reality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7032

22.

Cao

G.-W.

S.-S.

(2023). Design and evaluation for immersive virtual reality learning environment: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(3), 1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031964

23.

Carbonell-Carrera

Saorín

J. L.

(2017). Geospatial Google street view with virtual reality: A motivational approach for spatial training education. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(9), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6090261

24.

Checa

Bustillo

(2020). A review of immersive virtual reality serious games to enhance learning and training. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(9–10), 5501–5527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08348-9

25.

Chen

Wang

(2022). The effects of virtual reality-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 14(6), 3147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063147

26.

Chen

F.-Q.

Leng

Y.-F.

J.-F.

Wang

D.-W.

Chen

Sun

Z.-L.

(2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), Article e18290. https://doi.org/10.2196/18290

27.

Choi

Thompson

C. E.

Choi

Waddill

C. B.

Choi

(2022). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in nursing education: Systematic review. Nurse Educator, 47(3), E57–E61. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001117

28.

Christian

Salvador

Christian

(2021). Virtual reality (VR) in superior education distance learning: A systematic literature review. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 5(3), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.5.3.632

29.

Christopoulos

Pellas

Bin Qushem

Laakso

M. J.

(2023). Comparing the effectiveness of video and stereoscopic 360° virtual reality‐supported instruction in high school biology courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13306

30.

Clarke

Dede

(2005). Making learning meaningful: An exploratory study of using multi-user environments (MUVEs) in middle school scienceAmerican Educational Research Association Conference. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/rivercityproject/files/aera_2005_clarke_dede.pdf

31.

Coban

Bolat

Y. I.

Goksu

(2022). The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, Article 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100452

32.

Concannon

B. J.

Esmail

Roduta Roberts

(2019). Head-mounted display virtual reality in post-secondary education and skill training. Frontiers in Education, 4, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00080

33.

Conrad

Kablitz

Schumann

(2024). Learning effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in education and training: A systematic review of findings. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, Article 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100053

34.

Cruz-Neira

Sandin

D. J.

DeFanti

T. A.

Kenyon

R. V.

Hart

J. C.

(1992). The CAVE: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/129888.129892

35.

Cruz-Neira

Sandin

D. J.

DeFanti

T. A.

(1993). Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Anaheim, CA, 2–6 August, 1993, pp. 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/166117.166134

36.

De Back

T. T.

Tinga

A. M.

Nguyen

Louwerse

M. M.

(2020). Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00228-9

37.

Dede

(1995). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. Educational Technology, 35(5), 46–52.

38.

Dede

(2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311

39.

Dede

Ketelhut

Ruess

(2003). Designing for motivation and usability in a museum-based multi-user virtual environment. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Conference, Chicago, 2003.

40.

Demirci

Karaburun

Kılar

(2013). Using Google Earth as an educational tool in secondary school geography lessons. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 22(4), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.846700

41.

Deng

(2022). A systematic review on the influence of virtual reality on language learning outcomes. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.302083

42.

De Rijdt

Stes

Van Der Vleuten

Dochy

(2013). Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education: Research review. Educational Research Review, 8, 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.007

43.

Dhimolea

T. K.

Kaplan-Rakowski

Lin

(2022). A systematic review of research on high-immersion virtual reality for language learning. TechTrends, 66(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00717-w

44.

Di Lanzo

J. A.

Valentine

Sohel

Yapp

A. Y. T.

Muparadzi

K. C.

Abdelmalek

(2020). A review of the uses of virtual reality in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(3), 748–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22243

45.

Di Natale

A. F.

Repetto

Riva

Villani

(2020). Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030

46.

Ercil Cagiltay

Özyurt

Akgun

Özyurt

Ö.

(2021). A systematic review and mapping of the literature of virtual reality studies in earth science engineering education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067651

47.

Erita

Miaz

Jupriani

Hevria

Fauzi

(2024). Using virtual reality to enhance twenty-first-century skills in elementary school students: A systematic literature review. Open Education Studies, 6(1), Article 20240030. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0030

48.

Esteves

J. R.

Cardoso

J. C. S.

Gonçalves

B. S.

(2023). Design recommendations for immersive virtual reality application for English learning: A systematic review. Computers, 12(11), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12110236

49.

Fahl

J. T.

Duvivier

Reinke

Pierie

J. E. N.

Schönrock-Adema

(2023). Towards best practice in developing motor skills: A systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1

50.

Fleiss

J. L.

Levin

Paik

M. C.

(1981). The measurement of interrater agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2(212–236), 22–23.

51.

Fryer

L. K.

Bovee

H. N.

(2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and off line. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003

52.

Fryer

L. K.

Ainley

Thompson

Gibson

Sherlock

(2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045

53.

Gårdling

Viseu

Hettinger

Jildenstål

Augustinsson

(2025). The effects of virtual reality (VR) on clinical skills training in undergraduate radiography education: A systematic review. Radiography, 31(3), Article 102911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.102911

54.

Gianfredi

Nucci

Amerio

Signorelli

Odone

Dinu

(2022). What can we expect from an umbrella review? Advances in Nutrition, 13(2), 684–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab150

55.

Gittinger

Wiesche

(2024). Systematic review of spatial abilities and virtual reality: The role of interaction. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20568

56.

Goldstone

R. L.

Day

S. B.

(2012). Introduction to “New Conceptualizations of Transfer of Learning”. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695710

57.

Gong

(2021). Application of virtual reality teaching method and artificial intelligence technology in digital media art creation. Ecological Informatics, 63, Article 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101304

58.

Grant

M. J.

Booth

(2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

59.

Hamilton

McKechnie

Edgerton

Wilson

(2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2

60.

Hanson

Shelton

B. E.

(2008). Design and development of virtual reality: Analysis of challenges faced by educators. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 118–131.

61.

Hou

Liu

Luo

Xue

Yuan

Zhang

(2024). The impact of virtual reality applied in nurse education on students’ clinical thinking: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106553

62.

Howard

M. C.

Gutworth

M. B.

Jacobs

R. R.

(2021). A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106808

63.

Hua

Wang

(2023). Virtual reality-assisted language learning: A follow-up review (2018–2022). Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1153642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153642

64.

Huai

Wang

Zhang

Liu

Yang

(2024). The effectiveness of virtual reality technology in student nurse education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 138, Article 106189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106189

65.

Huang

C. L.

Luo

Y. F.

Yang

S. C.

C. M.

Chen

A.-S.

(2020). Influence of students’ learning style, sense of presence, and cognitive load on learning outcomes in an immersive virtual reality learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422

66.

Hwang

G.-J.

Chien

S.-Y.

(2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082

67.

Irwin

Coutts

(2015). A systematic review of the experience of using second life in the education of undergraduate nurses. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(10), 572–577. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150916-05

68.

Jallad

S. T.

Işık

(2022). The effectiveness of virtual reality simulation as learning strategy in the acquisition of medical skills in nursing education: A systematic review. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(3), 1407–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02695-z

69.

Jensen

Konradsen

(2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0

70.

Jiawei

Mokmin

N. A. M.

(2023). Virtual reality technology in art education with visual communication design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15125–15143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11845-y

71.

Johnson

Roussos

Leigh

Vasilakis

Barnes

Moher

(1998). The NICE project: Learning together in a virtual world. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180), Atlanta, GA, USA, 14–18 March, 1998, pp. 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1998.658487

72.

Jongbloed

Chaker

Lavoué

(2024). Immersive procedural training in virtual reality: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 221, Article 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105124

73.

Kanade

S. G.

Duffy

V. G.

(2024). Exploring the effectiveness of virtual reality as a learning tool in the context of task interruption: A systematic review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 99, Article 103548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103548

74.

Kavanagh

Luxton-Reilly

Wuensche

Plimmer

(2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.

75.

Keene

(2018). Google Daydream VR cookbook: Building games and apps with Google daydream and Unity. Addison-Wesley Professional.

76.

Khodabandeh

(2022). Exploring the applicability of virtual reality- enhanced education on extrovert and introvert EFL learners’ paragraph writing. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00334-w

77.

Kim

H.-Y.

Kim

E.-Y.

(2023). Effects of medical education program using virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053895

78.

Kolb

D. A.

(2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

79.

Kyaw

B. M.

Saxena

Posadzki

Vseteckova

Nikolaou

C. K.

George

P. P.

Divakar

Masiello

Kononowicz

A. A.

Zary

Tudor Car

(2019). Virtual reality for health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), Article e12959. https://doi.org/10.2196/12959

80.

Lampropoulos

(2025). Combining artificial intelligence with augmented reality and virtual reality in education: Current trends and future perspectives. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9020011

81.

Lan

Y. J.

Tang

K. Y.

(2025). Systematic review of risks hidden in VR-based learning environments: Research frameworks and evidence from the literature. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 216.

82.

Lara-Alvarez

C. A.

Parra-González

E. F.

Ortiz-Esparza

M. A.

Cardona-Reyes

(2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

83.

Leigh

Johnson

DeFanti

T. A.

(1997). CAVERN: A distributed architecture for supporting scalable persistence and interoperability in collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Applications, 2(2), 217–237.

84.

Lin

M.-Y.

Huang

M.-Z.

Lai

P.-C.

(2024). Effect of virtual reality training on clinical skills of nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Education in Practice, 81, Article 104182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104182

85.

Liu

J. Y. W.

Yin

Y.-H.

Kor

P. P. K.

Cheung

D. S. K.

Zhao

I. Y.

Wang

J. J.

Christensen

Tyrovolas

Leung

A. Y. M.

(2023). The effects of immersive virtual reality applications on enhancing the learning outcomes of undergraduate health care students: Systematic review with meta-synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, Article e39989. https://doi.org/10.2196/39989

86.

Lui

A. L. C.

Not

Wong

G. K. W.

(2023). Theory-based learning design with immersive virtual reality in science education: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 390–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10035-2

87.

Luo

Feng

Yang

Zuo

(2021). Virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 887–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538

88.

Lyu

Watanabe

Umemura

Murai

(2023). Design-thinking skill enhancement in virtual reality: A literature study. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, Article 1137293. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1137293

89.

Marougkas

Troussas

Krouska

Sgouropoulou

(2023). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(6), 18185–18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7

90.

Martín-Martín

Orduna-Malea

Thelwall

Delgado López-Cózar

(2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

91.

Mayer

R. E.

Moreno

(2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

92.

Michalski

S. C.

Szpak

Loetscher

(2019). Using virtual environments to improve real-world motor skills in sports: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02159

93.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

94.

Mitsea

Drigas

Skianis

(2023). Virtual reality mindfulness for meta-competence training among people with different mental disorders: A systematic review. Psychiatry International, 4(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint4040031

95.

Monica

Aleotti

(2022). Evaluation of the Oculus Rift S tracking system in room scale virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 26(4), 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00637-3

96.

Morgan

C. H.

Stager

L. M.

Schwebel

D. C.

Shen

(2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of virtual reality pedestrian interventions to teach children how to cross streets safely. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 48(12), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsad058

97.

Moro

Štromberga

Raikos

Stirling

(2017). The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696

98.

Moussa

Alghazaly

Althagafi

Eshky

Borzangy

(2022). Effectiveness of virtual reality and interactive simulators on dental education outcomes: Systematic review. European Journal of Dermatology, 16(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731837

99.

Narciso

Melo

Rodrigues

Paulo Cunha

Vasconcelos-Raposo

Bessa

(2021). A systematic review on the use of immersive virtual reality to train professionals. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(9), 13195–13214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10454-y

100.

Nelson

B. C.

Erlandson

B. E.

(2008). Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: Reflection on design practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(5–6), 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9082-1

101.

Odame-Amoabeng

Akalin

D’haenens

Tricas-Sauras

Chang

Y.-S.

(2025). Immersive insights: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of views, experiences, health and wellbeing of students and educators using virtual reality in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education Today, 150, Article 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106679

102.

Oje

A. V.

Hunsu

N. J.

Fiorella

(2025). A systematic review of evidence-based design and pedagogical principles in educational virtual reality environments. Educational Research Review, 47, Article 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100676

103.

Osgood‐Campbell

(2015). Investigating the educational implications of embodied cognition: A model interdisciplinary inquiry in mind, brain, and education curricula. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12063

104.

Oyelere

S. S.

Bouali

Kaliisa

Obaido

Yunusa

A. A.

Jimoh

E. R.

(2020). Exploring the trends of educational virtual reality games: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00142-7

105.

Özyurt

Ö.

Cagiltay

N. E.

Özyurt

Akgun

(2021). A systematic review and mapping of the literature of virtual reality studies in Earth science engineering education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067651

106.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

107.

Palincsar

A. S.

(1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345

108.

Pan

(2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings. Educational Research Review, 36, Article 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448

109.

Panda

(2024). Cost analysis and return on investment for blended learning. In Case studies on blended learning in higher education: Policy, planning and quality assurance (pp. 117–133). Springer Nature Singapore.

110.

Parmaxi

(2023). Virtual reality in language learning: A systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765392

111.

Peixoto

Pinto

Melo

Cabral

Bessa

(2021). Immersive virtual reality for foreign language education: A PRISMA systematic review. IEEE Access, 9, 48952–48962. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068858

112.

Pellas

Mystakidis

Kazanidis

(2021). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25(3), 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9

113.

Pinto

R. D.

Peixoto

Melo

Cabral

Bessa

(2021). Foreign language learning gamification using virtual reality—A systematic review of empirical research. Education Sciences, 11(5), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050222

114.

Pirker

Dengel

(2021). The potential of 360° virtual reality videos and real VR for education—A literature review. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 41(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2021.3067999

115.

Pizzoli

S. F. M.

Mazzocco

Triberti

Monzani

Alcañiz Raya

M. L.

Pravettoni

(2019). User-centered virtual reality for promoting relaxation: An innovative approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00479

116.

Pregowska

Masztalerz

Garlińska

Osial

(2021). A worldwide journey through distance education—From the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118

117.

Pretty

E. J.

Fayek

H. M.

Zambetta

(2024). A case for personalized non-player character companion design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(12), 3051–3070. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2181125

118.

Psotka

(1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 23(5–6), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896880

119.

Puente-Torre

Delgado-Benito

Rodríguez-Cano

García-Delgado

M. Á.

(2024). Virtual reality as an interactive tool for the implementation of mindfulness in university settings: A systematic review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(10), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8100089

120.

Qiao

Huang

C.-R.

Liu

S.-Y.

Redding

S. R.

Ouyang

Y.-Q.

(2023). Effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality simulation in learning knowledge and skills for nursing students: Meta-analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 76, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.12.003

121.

Radianti

Majchrzak

T. A.

Fromm

Wohlgenannt

(2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

122.

Rahmi

Helsa

Suparman

Amilia

Azrul

(2025). Virtual reality-based or assisted learning and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. TEM Journal, 14(1), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-52

123.

Renninger

K. A.

Hidi

Krapp

Renninger

(Eds.), (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807430

124.

Ritter

F. E.

Baxter

Kim

J. W.

Srinivasmurthy

(2013). Learning and retention. In Lee

J. D.

Kirlik

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 125–142). Oxford University Press.

125.

Rojas-Sánchez

M. A.

Palos-Sánchez

P. R.

Folgado-Fernández

J. A.

(2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5

126.

Rourke

(2020). How does virtual reality simulation compare to simulated practice in the acquisition of clinical psychomotor skills for pre-registration student nurses? A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 102, Article 103466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103466

127.

Rzotkiewicz

Pearson

A. L.

Dougherty

B. V.

Shortridge

Wilson

(2018). Systematic review of the use of Google Street View in health research: Major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research. Health & Place, 52, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.001

128.

Sailer

Homner

(2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

129.

Schwebel

D. C.

Barton

B. K.

Shen

Wells

H. L.

Bogar

Heath

McCullough

(2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions to improve child pedestrian safety. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(8), 826–845. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu024

130.

Scorgie

Feng

Paes

Parisi

Yiu

T. W.

Lovreglio

(2024). Virtual reality for safety training: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Safety Science, 171, Article 106372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106372

131.

Shapiro

(2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315180380/embodied-cognition-lawrence-shapiro.

132.

Silva-Díaz

Marfil-Carmona

Narváez

Silva Fuentes

Carrillo-Rosúa

(2023). Introducing virtual reality and emerging technologies in a teacher training STEM course. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101044

133.

Sinurat

Karo

M. B.

Simbolon

Saragih

I. D.

Tarihoran

D. E. T. A. U.

Sharma

Chou

F.-H.

(2025). The efficacy of virtual-reality teaching and learning method in enhancing interprofessional knowledge, clinical skill performance, and self-confidence in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 149, Article 106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106661

134.

Smith

Ralston

Gallegos

(2021). Integrating culturally responsive pedagogy and virtual reality. In Moran

C. M.

Rice

M. F.

(Eds.), Virtual and augmented reality in English language arts education (p. 225). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.

135.

Soliman

Pesyridis

Dalaymani-Zad

Gronfula

Kourmpetis

(2021). The application of virtual reality in engineering education. Applied Sciences, 11(6), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062879

136.

Stein

(2024, February 23). Meta quest 3 vs. Apple vision pro: Which one is better, and for what? CNET. https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/meta-quest-3-vs-apple-vision-pro-which-one-is-better-and-for-what/

137.

Sukirman

Ibharim

L. F. M.

Said

C. S.

Murtiyasa

(2022). A strategy of learning computational thinking through game based in virtual reality: Systematic review and conceptual framework. Informatics in Education, 21(1), 179–200.

138.

Sutherland

I. E.

(1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I on - AFIPS ’68 (Fall, Part I), San Francisco, California, 9–11 December, 1968, p. 757. https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686

139.

Sweller

(1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5

140.

Sweller

(2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

141.

Taggart

Wheeler

L. B.

(2025). Collaborative learning as constructivist practice: An exploratory qualitative descriptive study of faculty approaches to student group work. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231193938

142.

Tamilselvan

Chua

S. M.

Chew

H. S. J.

Devi

M. K.

(2023). Experiences of simulation-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Education Today, 121, Article 105711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105711

143.

Tastan

Tong

(2023). Immersive virtual reality in AECO/FM to enhance education: Systematic literature review and future directions. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(5), 1465–1491. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22631

144.

Taylor

G. L.

Disinger

J. F.

(1997). The potential role of virtual reality in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1997.9942828

145.

Tisoglu

Sönmez

Kaya

K. Y.

S. Z.

(2025). Bridging pedagogy and technology: A systematic review of immersive virtual reality’s potential in climate change education. Environmental Education Research, Onlinefirst. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2025.2480661

146.

Torres Martín

Acal

El Homrani

Mingorance Estrada

Á.

(2021). Impact on the virtual learning environment due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020582

147.

Toyoda

Russo-Abegão

Glassey

(2022). VR-based health and safety training in various high-risk engineering industries: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00349-3

148.

Tranton

(2016). Samsung gear VR: An easy guide for beginners (Vol. 1). Conceptual Kings.

149.

Udeozor

Chan

Russo Abegão

Glassey

(2023). Game-based assessment framework for virtual reality, augmented reality and digital game-based learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00405-6

150.

Villena-Taranilla

Tirado-Olivares

Cózar-Gutiérrez

González-Calero

J. A.

(2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434

151.

Wang

W.-S.

Lin

C.-J.

Lee

H.-Y.

Huang

Y.-M.

T.-T.

(2024a). Integrating feedback mechanisms and ChatGPT for VR-based experiential learning: Impacts on reflective thinking and AIoT physical hands-on tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1770–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2375644

152.

Wang

Mokmin

N. A. M.

(2024b). Enhancing higher education art students’ learning experience through virtual reality: A comprehensive literature review of product design courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 7399–7415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2315125

153.

Won

Ungu

D. A. K.

Matovu

Treagust

D. F.

Tsai

C.-C.

Park

Mocerino

Tasker

(2023). Diverse approaches to learning with immersive virtual reality identified from a systematic review. Computers & Education, 195, Article 104701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104701

154.

Woon

A. P. N.

Mok

W. Q.

Chieng

Y. J. S.

Zhang

H. M.

Ramos

Mustadi

H. B.

Lau

(2021). Effectiveness of virtual reality training in improving knowledge among nursing students: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Nurse Education Today, 98, Article 104655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104655

155.

(2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head‐mounted displays on learning performance: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13023

156.

Yahya

L. B.

Naciri

Radid

Chemsi

(2024). Immersive simulation in nursing and midwifery education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 21, 19. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.19

157.

Youngblut

(1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Institute for Defense Analyses.

158.

(2022). A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the effect of virtual reality technology on users’ learning outcomes. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22532

159.

Zahabi

Abdul Razak

A. M.

(2020). Adaptive virtual reality-based training: A systematic literature review and framework. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 725–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w

160.

Zhang

Luo

(2023). Using virtual reality interventions to promote social and emotional learning for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Children, 11(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11010041

161.

Zhong

Fryer

L. K.

Zheng

Shum

Chu

S. K. W.

(2025a). From gaming to reality: Effectiveness of skills transfer from competitive sandbox gaming environment to near and far contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00500-2

162.

Zhong

Fryer

L. K.

Zheng

Shum

Chu

S. K. W.

(2025b). The power of play: Integrating competitive sandbox game for experiential learning to foster twenty-first century skills. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00528-y

163.

Zhong

Guo

Fryer

L. K.

Chu

S. K. W.

Deng

(2025c). More than just fun: Investigating students’ perceptions towards the potential of leveraging esports for promoting the acquisition of 21st century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1089–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13146-4

164.

Zhong

Lian

Huang

Deng

(2025d). Affordances, constraints, and implications of ChatGPT in education from a social-ecological perspective: A data mining approach. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 16407–16440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13237-2

165.

Zontou

Kaminaris

Rangoussi

(2024). On the role of virtual reality in engineering education: A systematic literature review of experimental research (2011–2022). European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(5), 856–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2369188

166.

Zou

Jong

M. S. Y.

Huang

Cheng

Hwang

G. J.

Jiang

M. Y. C.

(2024). A systematic review of SVVR in language education in terms of the ADDIE model. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6672–6697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2277747

A Review of Reviews on Virtual Reality in Educational Context: Constraints,Implications,and Research Agendas

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References