Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This editorial brings together the insights of fourteen members of the journal’s editorial board to critically examine the evolving landscape of educational computing. In an era marked by rapid technological advancements; from generative artificial intelligence to extended reality, this editorial explores the multidimensional challenges and opportunities these developments present for education. Drawing from multidisciplinary perspectives, the contributors collectively identify four thematic areas that demand sustained scholarly attention: (1) Equity, Inclusion, and the Digital Divide; (2) Ethics, Social Sustainability, and Well-being; (3) Instructional Design; and (4) Human-Computer Interaction in Educational Technologies. Each theme reflects a convergence of urgent concerns and transformative potential and is accompanied by forward-looking research questions that aim to shape the future agenda of the field. Together, the contributions highlight critical tensions and possibilities, offering a roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers committed to harnessing educational computing technologies in socially responsible, pedagogically sound, and human-centred ways.

Keywords

educational computing digital equity ethics in technology instructional design human-computer interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamopoulou

Moussiades

(2020). Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 2, Article 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006

Al-Emran

(2023). Beyond technology acceptance: Development and evaluation of technology-environmental, economic, and social sustainability theory. Technology in Society, 75, Article 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2023.102383

Al-Emran

Al-Qaysi

Al-Sharafi

M. A.

Khoshkam

Foroughi

Ghobakhloo

(2025). Role of perceived threats and knowledge management in shaping generative AI use in education and its impact on social sustainability. International Journal of Management in Education, 23(1), Article 101105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJME.2024.101105

Allen

J. M.

Vahid

Downey

Edgcomb

A. D.

(2018). Weekly programs in a CS1 class: Experiences with auto-graded many-small programs (MSP). In ASEE annual conference & exposition. Salt Lake City, Utah.

Allison

(2025). Beyond innovation: Centring ethics and social responsibility in educational computing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(4), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251331851

Alsofyani

A. H.

Barzanji

A. M.

(2025). The effects of ChatGPT-generated feedback on Saudi efl learners’ writing skills and perception at the tertiary level: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(2), 431–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241307297

Arnold

R. D.

Wade

J. P.

(2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

Baker

R. S.

Hawn

(2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

Bernacki

M. L.

Greene

M. J.

Lobczowski

N. G.

(2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose(s)? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1675–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8

10.

Blanchard

Hott

J. R.

Berry

Carroll

Edmison

Glassey

Karnalim

Plancher

Russell

(2022). Stop reinventing the wheel! Promoting community software in computing education. Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571785.3574129

11.

Chang

C. Y.

Lin

H. C.

Yin

Yang

K. H.

(2025). Generative AI-assisted reflective writing for improving students’ higher order thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 270–285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48810719

12.

Chang

C. Y.

Wang

P. L.

C. J.

Hwang

G. J.

(2024). From empathy to quality long-term care: A generative AI-based art therapy approach based on the self-directed learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2443072

13.

de Freitas

(2014). Education in computer generated environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094709

14.

de Freitas

(2024). Podcast for times higher (Campus+). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/authors/sara-de-freitas

15.

Devore-McDonald

Berger

E. D.

(2020). Mossad: Defeating software plagiarism detection. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 4(OOPSLA, Article 138), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428206

16.

Doleck

Agand

Pirrotta

(2024). Integrating generative AI in data science programming: Group differences in hint requests. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), Article 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100089

17.

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Hughes

Ismagilova

Aarts

Coombs

Crick

Duan

Dwivedi

Edwards

Eirug

Galanos

Ilavarasan

P. V.

Janssen

Jones

Kar

A. K.

Kizgin

Kronemann

Lal

Lucini

Williams

M. D.

(2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

18.

Fan

Tang

Shen

Tan

Zhao

Shen

Gašević

(2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

19.

Feng

T. H.

Luxton-Reilly

Wünsche

B. C.

Denny

(2025). From automation to cognition: Redefining the roles of educators and generative AI in computing education. In Proceedings of the 27th australasian computing education conference (pp. 164–171). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3716640.3716658

20.

Weng

Wang

(2024). Examining AI use in educational contexts: A scoping meta-review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00442-w

21.

Fui-Hoon Nah

Zheng

Cai

Siau

Chen

(2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of information technology case and application research, 25(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814

22.

Goellner

Tropmann-Frick

Brumen

(2024). Responsible artificial intelligence: A structured literature review. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2403.06910. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.06910

23.

Goldshtein

Alhashim

A. G.

Roscoe

R. D.

(2024). Automating bias in writing evaluation: Sources, barriers, and recommendations. In Shermis

M. D.

Wilson

(Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of automated essay evaluation (pp. 421–444). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397618

24.

Goyal

(2025). AI as a cognitive partner: A systematic review of the influence of AI on metacognition and self-reflection in critical thinking. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(3), 1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1427

25.

Graziosi

Haubold

Cowen-Breen

Brooks

(2023). Machine learning and the future of philology: A case study. TAPA, 153(1), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2023.a901022

26.

Green

(1971). Wondering and the roots of motivation (chapter 9). In Green

T. F.

(Ed.), The activities of teaching. McGraw-Hill.

27.

Hanid

M. F. A.

Zakaria

M. I.

Hassan

(2025). The advancement of extended reality in education: Insights from a 2019–2024 bibliometric analysis. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-025-20821-2

28.

Hemminki-Reijonen

Hassan

N. M. A. M.

Huotilainen

Koivisto

J. M.

Cowley

B. U.

(2025). Design of generative AI-powered pedagogy for virtual reality environments in higher education. NPJ Science of Learning, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00326-1

29.

Hooshyar

Azevedo

Yang

(2024). Augmenting deep neural networks with symbolic educational knowledge: Towards trustworthy and interpretable ai for education. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 6(1), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.3390/make6010028

30.

Hooshyar

Šír

Yang

Kikas

Hämäläinen

Kärkkäinen

Azevedo

(2025). Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16148. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16148

31.

Hoq

Shi

Leinonen

Babalola

Lynch

Price

Akram

(2024). Detecting ChatGPT-generated code submissions in a CS1 course using machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (ACM), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630826

32.

Hoyles

Noss

(1992). A pedagogy for mathematical microworlds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302313

33.

Huang

Y.-M.

Chen

P.-H.

Lee

H. Y.

Sandnes

F. E.

T.-T.

(2025). ChatGPT-enhanced mobile instant messaging in online learning: Effects on student outcomes and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 168, Article 108659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108659

34.

Iatraki

Mikropoulos

T. A.

(2025). Using immersive augmented reality to teach Physics to students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(3), e70040. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70040

35.

Jaldi

C. D.

Ilkou

Schroeder

Shimizu

(2025). Education in the era of neurosymbolic AI. Journal of Web Semantics, 85, Article 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2024.100857

36.

Karnalim

Chivers

(2022). Layered similarity detection for programming plagiarism and collusion on weekly assessments. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(6), 1739–1752. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22553

37.

Karnalim

Toba

Johan

M. C.

(2024). Detecting AI assisted submissions in introductory programming via code anomaly. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16841–16866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12520-6

38.

Knox

Williamson

Bayne

(2019). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‘learnification’ and ‘datafication’ across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251

39.

Kohnke

Zou

(2025). Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners’ experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371

40.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(2002). A revision of bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

41.

Lai

C. L.

Y. F.

(2024). Roles, strategies, and research issues of generative AI in the mobile learning era. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 18(4), 516–537. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2024.141836

42.

Lee

H. Y.

Chen

P. H.

Wang

W. S.

Huang

Y. M.

T. T.

(2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: Effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4

43.

Lee

H. Y.

T. T.

Lin

C. J.

Wang

W. S.

Huang

Y. M.

(2023). Integrating computational thinking into scaffolding learning: An innovative approach to enhance science, technology, engineering, and mathematics hands-on learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231211916

44.

Levidow

Papaioannou

(2018). Which inclusive innovation? Competing normative assumptions around social justice. Innovation and Development, 8(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1351605

45.

Lin

C.-J.

Lee

H.-Y.

Wang

W.-S.

Huang

Y.-M.

T.-T.

(2025). Enhancing reflective thinking in STEM education through experiential learning: The role of generative AI as a learning aid. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6315–6337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13072-5

46.

Liu

Guo

(2025). Effects of generative artificial intelligence on K-12 and higher education students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251329185

47.

Liu

Y. L. E.

Lee

T. P.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2024). Exploring students’ continuance intention toward digital visual collaborative learning technology in design thinking. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(11), 2808–2821. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2172904

48.

Chiu

M. M.

Wang

Mao

Lei

(2025). Effects of augmented reality on students’ higher-order thinking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(3), 728–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241309644

49.

Mannekote

Davies

Pinto

J. D.

Zhang

Olds

Schroeder

N. L.

Lehman

Zapata-Rivera

Zhai

(2024). Large Language models for whole-learner support: Opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7(1460364), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1460364

50.

Mayer

(2025). Richard Mayer. UC Santa Barbara. https://psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/richard-mayer#:∼:text=RichardE.,andcomputergamesforlearning

51.

Mikropoulos

T. A.

Natsis

(2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020

52.

(2025). Problem solving with discrete variables from a computational thinking perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics, 45(2).

53.

Cui

(2021). Examining primary students’ mathematical problem-solving in a programming context: Towards computationally enhanced mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(4), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01200-7

54.

Leung

(2023). Exploring computational thinking as a boundary object between mathematics and computer programming for STEM teaching and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1315–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01509-z

55.

Ocumpaugh

Roscoe

R. D.

Baker

R. S.

Hutt

Aguilar

S. J.

(2024). Toward asset-based instruction and assessment in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(4), 1559–1598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x

56.

Panzoli

Peters

Dunwell

Sanchez

Petridis

Protopsaltis

de Freitas

(2010b). A level of interaction framework for exploratory learning with characters in virtual environments. In Intelligent computer graphics 2010 (pp. 123–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15690-8_7

57.

Panzoli

Peters

Dunwell

Sanchez

Petridis

Protopsaltis

Scesa

de Freitas

(2010a). Levels of interaction: A user-guided experience in large-scale virtual environments. In IEEE 2nd international conference in games and virtual worlds for serious applications (VS GAMES10) (pp. 87–90). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2010.27

58.

Papert

(1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

59.

Pellas

(2023). The effects of generative AI platforms on undergraduates’ narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111155

60.

Pellas

(2025). The role of students’ higher-order thinking skills in the relationship between academic achievements and machine learning using generative AI chatbots. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20(036), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20036

61.

Radianti

Majchrzak

T. A.

Fromm

Wohlgenannt

(2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147(Article 103778). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

62.

Rebolledo-Mendez

Burden

de Freitas

(2008). A model of motivation for virtual-worlds avatars. In Prendinger

Lester

Ishizuka

(Eds.), Iva 2008, lnai 5208 (pp. 535–536): Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85483-8_76

63.

Rebolledo-Mendez

de Freitas

(2008). Attention modeling using inputs from a brain computer interface and user-generated data in second life. In Proc. Of the workshop of affective interaction in natural environments (AFFINE) 2008. In association with ACM tenth international conference on multimodal interfaces (ICMI), Crete, Greece. ACM.

64.

Resnik

(2025). Large language models are biased because they are large language models. Computational Linguistics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00558

65.

Roscoe

R. D.

(2023). Building inclusive and equitable artificial intelligence for education. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589637

66.

Roscoe

R. D.

Chiou

E. K.

Wooldridge

A. R.

(2019). Advancing diversity, inclusion, and social justice through human systems engineering. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429425905

67.

Roscoe

R. D.

Salehi

Nixon

Worsley

Piech

Luckin

(2022). Inclusion and equity as a paradigm shift for artificial intelligence in education. In Ouyang

Jiao

McLaren

B. M.

Alavi

A. H.

(Eds.), Artificial intelligence in STEM education (pp. 359–374). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003181187

68.

Samala

A. D.

Rawas

Criollo-C

Bojic

Prasetya

Ranuharja

Marta

(2024). Emerging technologies for global education: A comprehensive exploration of trends, innovations, challenges, and future horizons. SN Computer Science, 5(8), 1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03538-1

69.

Sarnof

(2023). Weizenbaum’s nightmares: How the inventor of the first chatbot turned against AI. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai

70.

Schneider

Beege

Nebel

Schnaubert

Rey

G. D.

(2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5

71.

Schroeder

N. L.

Davis

R. O.

Yang

(2024). Designing and learning with pedagogical agents: An umbrella review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1907–1936. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241288476

72.

Seidman

(2017). Tribute to Seymour Papert (1928-2016). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(4), 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117710860

73.

Shahzad

M. F.

Zahid

(2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3691–3716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9

74.

Shailendra

Kadel

Sharma

(2024). Framework for adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(5), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3432101

75.

Siegle

R. F.

Schroeder

N. L.

Lane

H. C.

Craig

S. D.

(2023). Twenty-five years of learning with pedagogical agents: History, barriers, and opportunities. TechTrends, 67(5), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00869-3

76.

Soule

Bergmann

(2025). IBM granite 4.0 tiny preview: A sneak peek at the next generation of granite models. https://www.ibm.com/new/announcements/ibm-granite-4-0-tiny-preview-sneak-peek

77.

Y. F.

(2024). Roles and functionalities of ChatGPT for students with different growth mindsets. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 198–214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48754851

78.

Turing

A. M.

(1937). On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. The Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, s2-42(1), 230–265. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230

79.

Turing

A. M.

(1950). Chapter on: Computing Machinery and intelligence in mind. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lix.236.433

80.

VanLehn

(2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

81.

Veletsianos

Russell

G. S.

(2014). Pedagogical agents. In Spector

J. M.

Merrill

M. D.

Elen

Bishop

M. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 759–769). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_61

82.

Wang

W.-S.

Lin

C.-J.

Lee

H.-Y.

Huang

Y.-M.

T.-T.

(2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and higher-order thinking skills in virtual reality: The impact of ChatGPT-integrated feedback aids. Education and Information Technologies, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13557-x

83.

Wang

W.-S.

Lin

C. J.

Lee

H. Y.

T. T.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2024). Feedback mechanism in immersive virtual reality influences physical hands-on task performance and cognitive load. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(15), 4103–4115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2209837

84.

Warr

Oster

N. J.

Isaac

(2024). Implicit bias in large language models: Experimental proof and implications for education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2395295

85.

Williamson

(2017). Big data in education. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920

86.

Wing

J. M.

(2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

87.

Wolfram

(2020). The math(s) fix: An education blueprint for the AI age: Wolfram Media.

88.

C.-H.

Chien

Y.-C.

Chou

M.-T.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2025). Integrating computational thinking, game design, and design thinking: A scoping review on trends, applications, and implications for education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04502-x

89.

T.-T.

Lee

H.-Y.

Chen

P.-H.

Lin

C.-J.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2025). Integrating peer assessment cycle into ChatGPT for STEM education: A randomised controlled trial on knowledge, skills, and attitudes enhancement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), Article e13085. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13085

90.

T.-T.

Lee

H.-Y.

P.-H.

Huang

C.-N.

Huang

Y.-M.

(2023). Promoting self-regulation progress and knowledge construction in blended learning via ChatGPT-based learning aid. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 1539–1567. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231191125

91.

Yang

H. L.

Xiang

J. J.

(2024). Mobile learning and students’ academic achievement: A second-order meta-analysis study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241226589

92.

Yang

Cheng

P.-Y.

Lin

Huang

Y. M.

Ren

(2018). Can an integrated system of electroencephalography and virtual reality further the understanding of relationships between attention, meditation, flow state, and creativity? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118770800

93.

Yeung

W. L.

Zhang

(2024). Young children’s embodied computational thinking developed with touchscreen mathematics applications. Quadrant, 33(2), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.37071

94.

Yilmaz

Karaoglan Yilmaz

F. G.

(2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147

95.

Zhao

Pan

Gao

Cheng

(2022). Integrating internet of things and mixed reality to teach performance-based architectural design: A case study of shading devices. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9125–9143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10998-6

From Generative AI to Extended Reality: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Challenges,Opportunities,and Future of Educational Computing

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References