The objective of this research is to investigate how AI-improved dynamic physical education materials impact middle school education in physical settings. Utilizing a randomized controlled crossover approach, a 16-week study involved 120 students aged 12 to 18 to evaluate the impact of AI-enhanced physical education courses against traditional instructional techniques. Findings indicated a notable improvement in the AI group compared to traditional instruction in terms of physical fitness (23% enhancement), motor skill proficiency (31% improvement), and knowledge retention (27% enhancement) (p < .01). Evaluations of system usability reveal that users have an excellent experience (SUS score 84.3), with a 4.7/5 satisfaction score. Qualitative feedback underscores the importance of personalized coaching and real-time feedback. Notably, the AI system shows exceptional effectiveness for students with lower initial levels of physical fitness. An analysis after three months revealed a 19% success in comprehensive performance metrics (p < .01). This evidence points to the AI-aided physical education resources improving learning and user satisfaction, and opens new pathways for physical education innovation. Further investigation into long-term effects and widespread application across various educational contexts is needed.
AdrianK.LindaP. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
2.
AkintayoO. T.EdenC. A.AyeniO. O.OnyebuchiN. J. I.ResearchE. (2024). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector. A systematic review, 6(5), 1395–1422. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026
3.
AkramH.AbdelradyA. H.Al-AdwanA. S.RamzanM. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 13, Article 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
4.
AnR. P.ShenJ.WangJ. J.YangY. Y. (2024). A scoping review of methodologies for applying artificial intelligence to physical activity interventions. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 13(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2023.09.010
5.
BadshahA.GhaniA.DaudA.JalalA.BilalM.CrowcroftJ. (2024). Towards smart education through internet of things: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610401
6.
Bin MahmudM. Z.HidayatR.NabilahN.binti BaharuddinS. N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education. A Systematic Literature Review, 17(3), em0694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12132
7.
DishonG. (2017). New data, old tensions: Big data, personalized learning, and the challenges of progressive education. Theory and Research in Education, 15(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878517735233
8.
FisterI.LjubičK.SuganthanP. N.PercM.FisterI. (2015). Computational intelligence in sports: Challenges and opportunities within a new research domain. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 262, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.04.004
9.
FunkJ. B.BaldacciH. B.PasoldT.BaumgardnerJ. (2004). Violence exposure in real-life, video games, television, movies, and the internet: Is there desensitization?Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.005
10.
GonzálezA. (2018). Turning a traditional teaching setting into a feedback-rich environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(21), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0114-1
11.
GoodyearV. A.KernerC.QuennerstedtM. (2019). Young people's uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society, 24(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907
12.
HarperS.MichailidouE.StevensR. (2009). Toward a definition of visual complexity as an implicit measure of cognitive load. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1498700.1498704
13.
HolmesW.BialikM.FadelC. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
14.
HolsteinK.McLarenB.AlevenV. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–AI complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.3
15.
JastrowF.GreveS.ThumelM.DiekhoffH.SüßenbachJ. (2022). Digital technology in physical education: A systematic review of research from 2009 to 2020. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(4), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00848-5
16.
KuletoV.IlicM.DumangiuM.RankovicM.MartinsO. M. D.PaunD.MihoreanuL. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424
17.
LinX. P.LiB. B.YaoZ. N.YangZ.ZhangM. S. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom-a critical review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(8), Article 1360574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360574
18.
LindgrenR.TschollM.WangS.JohnsonE. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
PapastergiouM. (2009). Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 53(3), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.001
22.
WilderS. (2019). Book Review: Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Management Learning, 50(3), 382–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618772900
23.
WishartJ. (2018). Ethical considerations in the incorporation of mobile and ubiquitous technologies into teaching and learning in educational contexts. In YuS.AllyM.TsinakosA. (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: An international handbook (pp. 81–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_5
24.
XiongX. Z. (2021). A new physical education teaching system and training framework based on human-computer interaction and auxiliary interaction. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(14), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.24045
25.
ZhouY. L.ShaoW. D.WangL. J. (2021). Effects of feedback on students’ motor skill learning in physical education: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126281
