Writing plays a crucial role in the development of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ language; however, it remains a challenging skill for them to acquire. This study investigated how EFL students at a high school in Northern Vietnam engaged with the Writing Assistant Bot (WAB), an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot designed to support their writing practice at home. Focusing on students’ usage patterns, writing performance, and perceptions, the research included 47 participants, categorized into higher and lower proficiency levels. The mixed-method approach was employed, with chat logs, timed-writing tests, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicated differences in chatbot usage between the two proficiency levels at various writing stages, despite similarities in their focus on specific writing aspects. Lower-level learners predominantly utilized the chatbot during the Planning stage to generate vocabulary and brainstorm ideas, while higher-level learners mainly used it during the Translating stage to elaborate on ideas and refine their language for diverse and coherent expression. The chatbot significantly enhanced writing performance across all aspects: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics, for both levels. Students perceived it as a useful and easy-to-use tool.
AliS. S.RamanaV. L. (2018). Academic writing challenges at Universities in Saudi Arabia and solutions. International Journal of English Language and Humanities, 4(10), 291–298.
2.
AlishaF.SafitriN.SantosoI.SiliwangiI. (2019). Students’ difficulties in writing EFL. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(1), 20–25.
3.
AmaliaH.AbdullahF.FatimahA. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S2), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904066
4.
Belda-MedinaJ.Calvo-FerrerJ. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427
5.
BoudouaiaA.MouasS.KouiderB. (2024). A study on ChatGPT-4 as an innovative approach to enhancing English as a Foreign Language writing learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1509–1537. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241247465
6.
ChenH. L.Vicki WidarsoG.SutrisnoH. (2020). A ChatBot for learning Chinese: Learning achievement and technology acceptance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1161–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120929622
7.
ChenM. R. A.LinY. H. (2023). AI chatbot-supported grammar tense learning on EFL students learning effectiveness. In INTED2023 proceedings (pp. 1207–1216). IATED.
8.
CreswellJ. W.ShopeR.Plano ClarkV. L.GreenD. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1–11.
9.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
10.
DerakhshanA.Karimian ShirejiniR. (2020). An investigation of the Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions towards the most common writing problems. Sage Open, 10(2), Article 215824402091952. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919523
11.
FengL. (2024). Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted language learning strategies on cognitive load and learning outcomes: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1961–1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241268349
12.
FlowerL.HayesJ. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
13.
FryerL.CarpenterR. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language learning and technology. Language, Learning and Technology, 10(3), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.125/44068
14.
FuchsK. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is chat GPT a blessing or a curse?Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
15.
GuoK.LiY.LiY.ChuS. K. W. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ chatbot-assisted argumentative writing: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12230-5
16.
GuoK.WangJ.ChuS. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54(2), Article 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
17.
HaiyanM.RilongL. (2016). Classroom EFL writing: The alignment-oriented approach. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p76
18.
HsuM. H.ChenP. S.YuC. S. (2023). Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4297–4308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864
19.
HuangW.HewK. F.FryerL. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
20.
HuangW.JiaC.HewK. F.GuoJ. (2024). Using chatbots to support EFL listening decoding skills in a fully online environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 28(2), 62–90. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73572
21.
JacobsH. L. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. English composition program. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
22.
JeonJ. (2021). Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (CA-DA) for L2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1338–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272
23.
KimN. (2018). A study on chatbots for developing Korean college students’ English listening and reading skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.01.002
24.
KohnkeL. (2023). L2 learners’ perceptions of a chatbot as a potential independent language learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 17(1/2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2023.10053355
KuhailM. A.AlturkiN.AlramlawiS.AlhejoriK. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
27.
LinM. P. C.ChangD. (2020). Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 78–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915408
28.
LynchB. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
29.
MahmoudR. H. (2022). Implementing AI-based conversational chatbots in EFL speaking classes: An evolutionary perspective. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1911791/v1
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
NguyenD. KNguyenT. H. UPhanT. T. V (2021). Common errors in writing of EFL sophomores in a context of the Mekong delta. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 46–57.
33.
NunanD. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
34.
ŞenelE. (2018). The integration of creative writing into academic writing skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 6(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2869
35.
SuY.LinY.LaiC. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
36.
TengM. F.WangC.ZhangL. J. (2022). Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 51(100573), Article 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100573
37.
TranL. T. (2007). Learners’ motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 151–163. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ832183.pdf
38.
TsengY. C.LinY. H. (2024). Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ writing with ChatGPT: A university-level course design. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329
39.
TuanL. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learners’ writing skill via journal writing. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p81
40.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
41.
XuY.WangD.CollinsP.LeeH.WarschauerM. (2021). Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children’s reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner. Computers & Education, 161(1), Article 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104059
42.
YanD. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
43.
YangH.KimH.LeeJ. H.ShinD. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344022000039
44.
YinQ.SatarM. (2020). English as a Foreign Language learner interactions with chatbots: Negotiation for meaning. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(2), 390–410. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1250583.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
