Exploring Metacognitive Strategies Utilizing Digital Books: Enhancing Reading Comprehension Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Saudi Arabian Higher Education Settings

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine evidence-based practices related to reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies utilizing digital books among deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) in higher education. Previous literature has demonstrated that the major educational challenge for DHH students was developing reading comprehension skills. This issue becomes more complex when DHH students start their undergraduate education in Saudi Arabia due to the difficulty of understanding academic books and journals. Based on the preliminary data, an intervention was designed for DHH students with control and treatment groups (n = 36). The control group was taught using metacognitive strategies-based printed books. By contrast, the treatment group received an intervention through metacognitive strategies-based digital books. The procedure of the study was designed through multiple measurements: The Achievement Test of Reading Comprehension was used as a baseline measurement. In addition, classroom observations were used during the study to ensure the fidelity of treatment, and students’ perspectives were collected through a survey at the end of the intervention for the social validity purpose. The results indicated significant improvement for both groups with the largest effect relating to the treatment group in reading comprehension and engagement level compared with that of the control group.

Keywords

deaf hard of hearing differentiated reading instruction digital books reading comprehension accommodation undergraduate education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albertini

J. A.

Marschark

Kincheloe

P. J.

(2016) Deaf students’ reading and writing in college: Fluency, coherence, and comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 21(3): 303–309. doi:10.1093/deafed/env052.

Alhemidan, S. (2009, June). The rate of dropout among deaf students. Asharq Al Awsat Newspaper. Retrieved from http://archive.aawsat.com/details.asp?issueno.

Al-Hilawani

Y. A.

(2008) Metacognitive performances of hearing students and of students who are deaf and hard-of-hearing on two types of measures: Visual–voiced and visual–visual stimuli. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 55(4): 331–339. doi:10.1080/10349120802489554.

Allen

Clark

M. D.

del Giudice

Koo

Lieberman

Mayberry

Miller

(2009) Phonology and reading: A response to Wang, Trezek, Luckner, and Paul. American Annals of the Deaf 154(4): 338–345. doi:0.1353/aad.0.0109.

Almoniyi

Alrayis

(2009) Reading comprehension and written expression among deaf students who enrolled in colleges of technical and vocational training corporation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation 1(3): 83–112. Retrieved from http://www.sero-eg.com/.

Alsalem

M. A.

(2016a) Increasing teaching competency for teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing through the principles of universal design for learning. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education 5(4): 115–136. Retrieved from http://www.iijoe.org/.

Alsalem

M. A.

(2016b) Theoretical foundations and educational frameworks to adapt the curriculum of the deaf and hard of hearing to enable access to the general education curriculum. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation 4(13): 174–211. Retrieved from http://www.sero-eg.com/.

Alvarado

J. M.

Puente

Herrera

(2008) Visual and phonological coding in working memory and orthographic skills of deaf children using Chilean sign language. American Annals of the Deaf 152(5): 467–479. doi:10.1353/aad.2008.0009.

Azevedo

(2005) Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist 40(4): 193–197. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_1.

10.

Banner

Wang

(2011) An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16(1): 2–23. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq027.

11.

Barton

Hamilton

(1998) Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community, London, England: Routledge.

12.

Bawden

(2001) Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation 57(2): 218–259. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007083.

13.

Beck

I. L.

McKeown

M. G.

(2007) Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal 107(3): 251–271. doi:10.1086/511706.

14.

Benedict

K. M.

Rivera

M. C.

Antia

S. D.

(2015) Instruction in metacognitive strategies to increase deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 20(1): 1–15. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu026.

15.

Biancarosa

Snow

C. E.

(2006) Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

16.

Borgna

Convertino

Marschark

Morrison

Rizzolo

(2010) Enhancing deaf students’ learning from sign language and text: Metacognition, modality, and the effectiveness of content scaffolding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16(1): 79–100. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq036.

17.

Brackenbury

Ryan

Messenheimer

(2006) Incidental word learning in a hearing child of deaf adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(1): 76–93. doi:10.1093/deafed/enj018.

18.

Carlisle

J. F.

Rice

M. S.

(2002) Improving reading comprehension: Research-based principles and practices, Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc.

19.

Carnahan

C. R.

Williamson

P. S.

Hollingshead

Israel

(2012) Using technology to support balanced literacy for students with significant disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children 45(1): 20–29. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500104.

20.

Chandler-Olcott

Mahar

(2003) “Tech-savviness” meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls’ technology-mediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly 38(3): 356–385. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.3.3.

21.

Convertino

Borgna

Marschark

Durkin

(2014) Word and world knowledge among deaf learners with and without cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 19(4): 471–483. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu024.

22.

Convertino

C. M.

Marschark

Sapere

Sarchet

Zupan

(2009) Predicting academic success among deaf college students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14(3): 324–343. doi:10.1093/deafed/enp005.

23.

Cubukcu

(2008) Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research 18(1): 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier.html.

24.

Dalton

Proctor

C. P.

(2007) Reading as thinking: Integrating strategy instruction in a universally designed digital literacy environment. In: McNamara

(ed.) Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 421–440.

25.

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program. (2016, June 17). The higher education program for deaf and hard-of-hearing at King Saud University. Retrieved from http://deaf.ksu.edu.sa/en.

26.

Denham

P. J.

Battro

A. M.

(2012) Education of the deaf and hard of hearing in the digital era. Mind, Brain, and Education 6(1): 51–53. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01134.x.

27.

Dew

(1999) Serving individuals who are low-functioning deaf: Report of the twenty-fifth institute on rehabilitation issues, Washington, DC: George Washington University.

28.

Digital Learning Now. (2012). Digital Learning Report Card. Retrieved from http://digitallearningnow.com/site/uploads/2014/01/2012ReportCard.pdf.

29.

Dyer

MacSweeney

Szczerbinski

Green

Campbell

(2003) Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: The relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonological awareness and decoding. Journal of Deaf Students and Deaf Education 8(3): 215–229. doi:10.1093/deafed/eng012.

30.

Easterbrooks

S. R.

(2010) Evidence-based curricula and practices that support development of reading skills. In: Marshark

Spencer

P. E.

(eds) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education – Volume 2, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–126.

31.

Easterbrooks

S. R.

Baker

(2002) Language learning in children who are deaf and hard of hearing: Multiple pathways, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

32.

Edmonds

Vaughn

Wexler

Reutebuch

Cable

Tackett

Schnakenberg

(2009) A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research 79(1): 262–300. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325998.

33.

Edyburn

D. L.

(2009) Instructional design advances in special education technology. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 17(2): 63–65. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09362830902805699.

34.

Erting

C. J.

Kuntze

(2008) Language socialization in deaf communities. In: Duff

Hornberger

N. H.

(eds) Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol, 8, pp. 287–300). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

35.

Eshet

(2012) Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 9(2): 267–276. Retrieved from https://www.informingscience.org/Journals/IISIT.

36.

Gee

(2000) The new literacy studies: From “socially situated” to the work of the social. In: Barton

Hamilton

Ivanic

(eds) Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, London, England: Routledge, pp. 180–196.

37.

Gee

(2010) A situated sociocultural approach to literacy and technology. In: Baker

E. A.

(ed.) The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 165–193.

38.

Gee

(2015) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, 5th ed. London, England: Routledge.

39.

Gersten

Fuchs

L. S.

Compton

Coyne

Greenwood

Innocenti

M. S.

(2005) Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children 71(2): 149–164. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202.

40.

Huck

S. W.

(2000) Reading statistics and research, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Longman.

41.

Jackson

D. W.

Paul

P. V.

Smith

J. C.

(1997) Prior knowledge and reading comprehension ability of deaf adolescents. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2(3): 172–184. Retrieved from http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/.

42.

Jalkanen

Vaarala

(2013) Digital texts for learning Finnish: Shared resources and emerging practices. Language Learning & Technology 17(1): 107–124. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/.

43.

Kamil

M. L.

(2003) Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century, Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

44.

Kelly

R. R.

Albertini

J. A.

Shannon

N. B.

(2001) Deaf college students’ reading comprehension and strategy use. American Annals of the Deaf 146(5): 385–400. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0206.

45.

Kelly

R. R.

Lang

H. G.

Mousley

Davis

S. M.

(2003) Deaf college students’ comprehension of relational language in arithmetic compare problems. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8(2): 120–132. doi:10.1093/deafed/eng006.

46.

Kennedy

M. J.

Deshler

D. D.

(2010) Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly 33(4): 289–298. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300406.

47.

Kluwin

T. N.

Kelly

A. B.

(1992) Deaf adolescents who drop out of local public schools. American Annals of the Deaf 137(3): 293–298. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0467.

48.

Kuntze

(1998) Literacy and deaf children: The language question. Topics in Language Disorders 18(4): 1–15. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/topicsinlanguagedisorders/pages/default.aspx.

49.

Kyle

F. E.

Harris

(2006) Concurrent correlates and predictors of reading and spelling achievement in deaf and hearing school children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(3): 273–288. doi:10.1093/deafed/enj0370467.

50.

Lane

K. L.

Kalberg

J. R.

Bruhn

A. L.

Driscoll

S. A.

Wehby

J. H.

Elliott

S. N.

(2009) Assessing social validity of school-wide positive behavior support plans: Evidence for the reliability and structure of the primary intervention rating scale. School Psychology Review 38(1): 135, Retrieved from http://naspjournals.org/.

51.

Lang

H. G.

(2002) Higher education for deaf students: Research priorities in the new millennium. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7(4): 267–280. doi:10.1093/deafed/7.4.267.

52.

Lankshear

Knobel

(2003) New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

53.

Larson

L. C.

(2008) Electronic reading workshop: Beyond books with new literacies and instructional technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52(2): 121–131. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.3.

54.

Lasak

J. M.

Allen

McVay

Lewis

(2014) Hearing loss: Diagnosis and management. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 41(1): 19–31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2013.10.003.

55.

Leu

(2006) New literacies, reading research, and the challenges of change: A deictic perspective. In: Hoffman

J. M.

Schallert

D. L.

Fairbanks

C. M.

Worthy

Maloch

(eds) The 55th yearbook of the national reading conference, Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference, Inc, pp. 1–20.

56.

Luckner

J. L.

Bruce

S. M.

Ferrell

K. A.

(2015) A summary of the communication and literacy evidence-based practices for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, visually impaired, and deafblind. Communication Disorders Quarterly 37(4): 225–241. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115597507.

57.

Luckner

J. L.

Cooke

(2010) A summary of the vocabulary research with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf 155(1): 38–67. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0129.

58.

Luckner

J. L.

Handley

C. M.

(2008) A summary of the reading comprehension research undertaken with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf 153(1): 6–36. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0006.

59.

Luckner

J. L.

Sebald

A. M.

Cooney

Young

Muir

S. G.

(2005) An examination of the evidence-based literacy research in deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf 150(5): 443–456. doi:10.1353/aad.2006.0008.

60.

Marschark

Lang

H. G.

Albertini

J. A.

(2002) Educating deaf students: From research to practice, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

61.

Marschark

Sapere

Convertino

C. M.

Mayer

Wauters

Sarchet

(2009) Are deaf students’ reading challenges really about reading? American Annals of the Deaf 154(4): 357–370. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0111.

62.

Marschark

Sapere

Convertino

Seewagen

(2005) Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1): 38–50. doi:10.1093/deafed/eni002.

63.

Martin

D. S.

Craft

Sheng

Z. N.

(2001) The impact of cognitive strategy instruction on deaf learners: An international comparative study. American Annals of the Deaf 146(4): 366–378. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0156.

64.

Meneghetti

Carretti

De Beni

(2006) Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences 16(4): 291–301. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.11.001.

65.

Messier

Wood

(2015) Facilitating vocabulary acquisition of children with cochlear implants using electronic storybooks. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 20(4): 356–373. doi:10.1093/deafed/env031.

66.

Morrison

Marschark

Sarchet

Convertino

C. M.

Borgna

Dirmyer

(2013) Deaf students’ metacognitive awareness during language comprehension. European Journal of Special Needs Education 28(1): 78–90. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.749610.

67.

Mott

M. S.

Benus

M. J.

(2006) Digital books with media-rich paper: Enhancing reading comprehension through touch user interface technology. Journal of Literacy & Technology 7(2): Retrieved from http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/.

68.

Napier

Barker

(2004) Accessing university education: Perceptions, preferences, and expectations for interpreting by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9(2): 228–238. doi:10.1093/deafed/enh024.

69.

National Agenda Steering and Advisory Committees. (2005). The National Agenda: Moving forward on achieving educational equality for deaf and hard of hearing students. Retrieved from http://www.ndepnow.org/pdfs/national_agenda.pdf.

70.

National Center for Assessment. (2016). Language tests (9/12/2016). Retrieved from http://www.qiyas.sa/sites/English/Pages/default.aspx.

71.

National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

72.

Parault

S. J.

Williams

H. M.

(2009) Reading motivation, reading amount, and text comprehension in deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 15(2): 120–135. doi:10.1093/deafed/enp031.

73.

Paul

P. V.

(2003) Processes and components of reading. In: Marshark

Spencer

P. E.

(eds) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–109.

74.

Mitchell

R. E.

(2012) Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(1): 1–18. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr028.

75.

Samuels

S. J.

Ediger

Willcutt

J. R.

Palumbo

(2005) Role of automaticity in metacognition and literacy instruction. In: Israel

S. E.

Block

C. C.

Bauserman

K. L.

Kinnucan-Welsch

(eds) Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction and professional development, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 42–59.

76.

Schirmer

B. R.

McGough

S. M.

(2005) Teaching reading to children who are deaf: Do the conclusions of the National Reading Panel apply? Review of Educational Research 75(1): 83–117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001083.

77.

Segers

Verhoeven

(2015) Benefits of technology-enhanced learning for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In: Knoors

Marschark

(eds) Educating deaf learners: Creating a global evidence base, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–502.

78.

Shiratuddin

Hassan

Landoni

(2003) A usability study for promoting e-content in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 6(4): 112–124. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/.

79.

Snow

C. E.

(2003) Assessment of reading comprehension. In: Sweet

A. P.

Snow

C. E.

(eds) Rethinking reading comprehension, New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 192–206.

80.

Snow

C. E.

Biancarosa

(2003) Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here?, New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.

81.

Spencer

P. E.

Marschark

(2010) Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

82.

Stinson

Walter

(1997) Improving retention for deaf and hard of hearing students: What the research tells us. Journal of American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association 30(4): 14–23. Retrieved from https://catalyst.library.jhu.edu/catalog/bib_3604082.

83.

Storch

Whitehurst

(2002) Oral language and code related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology 38(6): 934–947. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934.

84.

Street

(2003) What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education 5(2): 77–91. Retrieved from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/.

85.

Street

(2013) Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education, New York, NY: Routledge.

86.

Tie-Jun

Yong-Hong

Chun-Li

Xiao-Dong

Wen

(2005) Towards a multilingual, multimedia and multimodal digital library platform. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A 6(11): 1188–1192. doi:10.1007/BF02841653.

87.

Traxler

C. B.

(2000) The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 5(4): 337–348. doi:10.1093/deafed/5.4.337.

88.

Trezek

B. J.

Wang

Paul

P. V.

(2011) Processes and components of reading. In: Marshark

Spencer

P. E.

(eds) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education – Volume 1, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–114.

89.

United Nations. (2016, June 15). United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.

90.

Van der Kleij

F. M.

Feskens

R. C.

Eggen

T. J.

(2015) Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 85(4): 475–511. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881.

91.

Vermeulen

A. M.

Van Bon

Schreuder

Knoors

Snik

(2007) Reading comprehension of deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12(3): 283–302. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm017.

92.

Walker

Munro

Rickards

F. W.

(1998) Literal and inferential reading comprehension of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Volta Review 100(2): 87–103. Retrieved from https://www.agbell.org.

93.

Wauters

Tellings

van Leeuwe

J. F.

(2006) In search of factors in deaf and hearing children’s reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf 151(3): 371–380. doi:10.1353/aad.2006.0041.

94.

Wauters

L. N.

Van Bon

W. H.

Tellings

A. E.

(2006) Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing 19(1): 49–76. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5894-0.

95.

Weng

Maeda

Bouck

(2014) Effectiveness of cognitive skills-based computer assisted instruction for students with disabilities: A synthesis. Remedial and Special Education 35(3): 167–180. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513514858.

96.

Wilbur

R. B.

(2000) The use of ASL to support the development of English and literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 5(1): 81–104. doi:10.1093/deafed/5.1.81.

97.

Wolfe

Flewitt

(2010) New technologies, new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. Cambridge Journal of Education 40(4): 387–399. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.526589.

98.

Woody

W. D.

Daniel

D. B.

Baker

C. A.

(2010) E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education 55(3): 945–948. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005.