Today, the use of social network-based virtual learning communities is increasing rapidly in terms of knowledge management. An important dynamic of knowledge management processes is the knowledge sharing behaviors (KSB) in community. The purpose of this study is to examine the KSB of the students in a Facebook-based virtual community created within the scope of a class in terms of their social presence (SP) and transactional distance (TD) perceptions. Both SP and TD are important factors in the creation of a community feeling and in the interaction of the participants, and it is believed that these two factors will effect KSB in virtual communities. Data were gathered from 217 university students by using three scales: the KSB scale, the SP scale (subdimensions: interaction, ownership, and affective statements) and the TD scale (subdimensions: student–student [S–S] interaction, student–teacher [S–T] interaction, student–content [S–C] interaction, student–interface [S–I] interaction, and student–environment [S–E] interaction). The structural equation modeling showed that students’ KSB were related to their SP and TD perceptions in the process of utilizing virtual learning communities. The results of the study indicate that each subdimension of SP and TD scales are significant predictors on KSB. Further researches and implications are explained and discussed.
Alakurt, T. (2013). Sanal uygulama topluluğu üyelerinin bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi [An analysis of the factors influencing knowledge sharing behaviours between members of virtual communities of practice] (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara.
2.
AndersonT.GarrisonD. R. (1998) Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In: GibsonC. C. (ed.) Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes, Madison, WI: Atwood, pp. 97–112.
3.
AragonS. R. (2003) Creating social presence in online environment. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education100: 57–68.
4.
AydinS. (2012) A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development60(6): 1093–1106.
5.
BoazM.ElliotB.FosheeD.HardyD.JarmonC.OlcottD.Jr (1999) Teaching at a distance: A handbook for instructors, San Diego, CA: Jointly published with Archipelago, a division of Harcourt Brace & Co.
6.
ChouS. W.MinH. T. (2009) The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: The perspective of social construction. Computers & Education52(2): 417–431.
7.
CreswellJ. (2013) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall.
8.
Cutler, R. H. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 12–32. Retrieved from: http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/cutler.txt (2 July 2016).
9.
DengL.TavaresN. J. (2013) From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education68: 167–176.
10.
Fitzgerald, G., Mitchem, K., Hollingsead, C., Miller, K., & Koury, K. (2005). Enhancing case-based learning using online discussion groups: diversity of practice. In Proceedings of International Special Education Conference. Scotland: Glasgow.
11.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105.
12.
GarrisonD. R. (2006) Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction4: 47–58.
13.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM.FungT. S. (2010) Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education13(1): 31–36.
14.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (2006) Multivariate data analysis with reading, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6(1): 53–60.
16.
HouH. T.SungY. T.ChangK. E. (2009) Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education25(1): 101–108.
17.
Kilic-CakmakE.CebiA.KanA. (2014) Developing a “social presence scale” for e-learning environments. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice14(2): 755–768.
18.
KlineR. B. (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
LehA. S. (2001) Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications7(2): 109–128.
20.
Lu, Y., Huang, W., Ma, H., & Luce, T. (2007). Interaction, social presence in technology mediated learning—A partial least square model. Proceedings of Wireless Communication, Networking, Mobile Computing, WiCOM Management Track: Information System & Management, China.
21.
MazmanS. G.UsluelY. K. (2010) Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education55(2): 444–453.
22.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2007) A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences42(5): 869–874.
23.
MooreM. G.KearsleyG. (2011) Distance education: A systems view of online learning, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
PaulR. C.SwartW.ZhangA. M.MacLeodK. R. (2015) Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education36(3): 364–382.
26.
RourkeL.AndersonT.GarrisonD. R.ArcherW. (1999) Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education14(2): 50–71.
27.
RourkeL.AndersonT.GarrisonD. R.ArcherW. (2001) Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education12: 8–22.
28.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).
29.
RovaiA. P. (2007) Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education10(1): 77–88.
30.
SalmonG. (2004) E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online, Hove, England: Psychology Press.
31.
Shin, N. (2001). Beyond interaction: Transactional presence and distance learning (Doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
32.
SteinD. S.WanstreetC. E.CalvinJ.OvertoomC.WheatonJ. E. (2005) Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education19(2): 105–118.
Swain, C. (2002). Improving traditional teaching using findings from distance education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.uncw.edu/jet/articles/Swain/.
35.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
36.
ThompsonB. (2004) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37.
TuC. H.McIsaacM. (2002) The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education16(3): 131−150.
38.
WangX.LaffeyJ.XingW.MaY.StichterJ. (2016) Exploring embodied social presence of youth with Autism in 3D collaborative virtual learning environment: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior55: 310–321.
39.
WangS.NoeR. A. (2010) Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review20(2): 115–131.
40.
WearmouthJ.SmithA. P.SolerJ. (2004) Computer conferencing with access to a guest expert in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators. British Journal of Educational Technology35(1): 81–93.
41.
VygotskyL. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
YilmazF. G. K.KeserH. (2016) The impact of reflective thinking activities in e-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education95: 163–173.
43.
Yilmaz, R. (2014). Çevrimiçi öğrenmede etkileşim ortamının ve üstbilişsel rehberliğin akademik başarı, üstbilişsel farkındalık ve işlemsel uzaklığa etkisi [The effect of interaction environment and metacognitive guidance in online learning on academic success, metacognitive awareness and transactional distance] (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara.
44.
YilmazR. (2016) Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior63: 373–382.
45.
YilmazR.KeserH. (2015) İşlemsel uzaklık ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması [The adaptation study of transactional distance scale]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education]30(4): 91–105.
46.
YilmazR.KeserH. (2016) The impact of interactive environment and metacognitive support on academic achievement and transactional distance in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research. doi:10.1177/0735633116656453.
47.
YuT. K.LuL. C.LiuT. F. (2010) Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs. Computers in Human Behavior26(1): 32–41.
48.
Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia.
49.
ZhangX.GaoY.YanX.Ordóñez de PablosP.SunY.CaoX. (2015) From e-learning to social-learning: Mapping development of studies on social media-supported knowledge management. Computers in Human Behavior51: 803–811.
50.
ZhangX.Ordóñez de PablosP.XuQ. (2014) Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior31: 491–498.
51.
ZhangX.Ordóñez de PablosP.ZhuH. (2012) The impact of second life on team learning outcomes from the perspective of IT capabilities. International Journal of Engineering Education28: 1388–1392.
