Adult learners are taking advantage of the availability and convenience of online education. Mature learners in online higher education classrooms bring a wealth of experience filtered through cultural, generational, and socioeconomical differences. The purpose of this research was to explore community building in an online graduate course by tapping learners’ prior experience using an autobiographical memory exercise. The authors found that building social presence through course design contributed to increased communication and learning and encouraged an active and engaged online learning community. Recommendations for improving online learning communities provide educators with ideas for practice.
ArbaughJ.BangertA.Cleveland-InnesM. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 37-44.
2.
ConradR.DonaldsonJ. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
CoulsonD.HarveyM. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 401-413.
4.
DennenV. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26, 127-148.
5.
Drago-SeversonE. (2009). Leading adult learning: Supporting adult development in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
6.
FenwickT. (2003). Learning through experience: Troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
7.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105.
8.
GarrisonD. R.ArbaughJ. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-172.
9.
HolzweissP.JoynerS.FullerM.HendersonS.YoungR. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, 35, 311-323.
10.
JordiR. (2011). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult Education Quarterly, 61, 181-197.
11.
KnowlesM.HoltonE.SwansonR. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
12.
KuhG. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683-706.
13.
MacKeracherD. (2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
14.
McDougallJ. (2015). The quest for authenticity: A study of an online discussion forum and the needs of adult learners. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55, 94-113.
15.
MerriamS. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
MerriamS.CaffarellaR.BaumgartnerL. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
MichelsonE. (1998). Re-membering: The return of the body to experiential learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 20, 217-233.
18.
MurphyK.MahoneyS.ChenC.Mendoza-DiazN.YangX. (2005). A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Education, 26, 341-366.
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). National postsecondary student aid study (NPSAS:04, NPSAS:08, and NPSAS:12). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_chb.asp
20.
PalloffR.PrattK. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
PetersD.DalyS. (2013). Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 244-268.
22.
PiagetJ. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York, NY: Grossman.
23.
RichardsonJ.IceP. (2010). Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 52-59.
24.
RovaiA. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3, 1-16.
25.
RovaiA. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 79-93.
26.
ShearerR.GreggA.JooK. (2015). Deep learning in distance education: Are we achieving the goal?The American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 126-134.
27.
SmithR. (2010). The epistemic challenges, trust and the online collaborative group. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29, 21-44.
28.
TennantM. (2012). The learning self: Understanding the potential for transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
VygotskyL. (2012). Thought and language (Rev. & Expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31.
WeimerM. (2006). Enhancing scholarly work on teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
