Undergraduate Students Engagement in Formal and Informal Learning: Applying the Community of Inquiry Framework

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative case study is to examine the evidence of formal and informal learning of students in an undergraduate educational technology course for preservice teachers. The research question was, “How do undergraduate students in an educational technology course bridge formal and informal learning using Twitter?” The framework for this study was the Community of Inquiry. Directed content analysis was used on data extracted from Twitter. Key findings included, (1) evidence of cognitive, social, and teaching presence for students completing course activities using Twitter, that is, for their formal learning; and that (2) students developed competencies during formal course activities using Twitter that supported cognitive and social presence beyond the course requirements, that is, for their informal learning.

Keywords

community of inquiry informal learning preservice teachers cognitive presence social presence teacher presence Twitter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akcaoglu

Lee

(2018). Using Facebook groups to support social presence in online learning. Distance Education, 39(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476842

Alaggia

Wang

(2020). “I never told anyone until the #metoo movement”: What can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media? Child Abuse & Neglect, 103, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312

Anderson

(2019). Challenges and opportunities for use of social media in higher education. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(1), 6–19.

Baskarada

(2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559424

Bowman

N. D.

Akcaoglu

(2014). “I see smart people!”: Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.003

Boyd

(2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Buckingham

(Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital Media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brock

(2020). 3.“The Black purposes of space travel”: Black Twitter as black technoculture. In Distributed Blackness (pp. 79–124). New York University Press.

Bull

Thompson

Searson

Garofalo

Park

Young

Lee

(2008). Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100–107. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29328/

Carpenter

J. P.

Krutka

D. G.

(2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41, 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.939294

10.

Chatterjee

Parra

(2020). Innovative design revisions on an undergraduate technology integration course for K-12 preservice teachers. In Ferdig

R. E.

Baumgartner

Hartshorne

Kaplan-Rakwoski

Chrystalla

(Eds.), Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 431–441). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/.

11.

Cleveland-Innes

Campbell

(2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234

12.

Creswell

J. W.

(2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Dierking

L. D.

Falk

J. H.

Rennie

Anderson

Ellenbogen

(2003). Policy statement of the “informal science education” ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10066

14.

Dunlap

J. C.

Lowenthal

P. R.

(2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129–136. http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/maclachlan/EDER_679.06_Fall_2009/tweeting_the_nigh_a way.pdf

15.

Eraut

(2010). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245

16.

Evans

J. R.

Karlsven

Perry

S. B.

(2020). Informal learning. In Kimmons

Caskurlu

(Eds.), The students’ guide to learning design and research. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/informal_learning.

17.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

Archer

(2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

18.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

Archer

(2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

19.

Garrison

D. R.

Cleveland-Innes

Fung

T. S.

(2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

20.

Garrison

D. R.

Cleveland-Innes

Koole

Kappelman

(2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiating coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001

21.

Greenhow

Lewin

(2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954

22.

Greenhow

Robelia

(2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580

23.

Hart

J. E.

(2020). Importance of instructional designers in online higher education. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2). https://doi. org/10.51869/92jeh

24.

Hickey

Kipping

(1996). Issues in research. A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.1.81.s9

25.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

26.

Jackson

S. J.

(2016). (Re)imagining intersectional democracy from black feminism to hashtag activism. Women's Studies in Communication, 39(4), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1226654

27.

Jenkins

(2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (part One). Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2(01), 23–33. https://www.idunn.no/dk/2007/01/confronting_the_challenges_of_participatory_culture_media_education_for_the

28.

Kanuka

Garrison

D. R.

(2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21.

29.

Koseoglu

Koutropoulos

(2016). Teaching Presence in MOOCs: Perspectives and Learning Design Strategies. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning 2016, Lancaster.

30.

Kreijns

Van Acker

Vermeulen

Van Buuren

(2014). Community of inquiry: Social presence revisited. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5

31.

Krutka

D. G.

Carpenter

J. P.

Trust

(2016). Elements of engagement: A model of teacher interactions via professional learning networks. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(4), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1206492

32.

Lantz-Andersson

Lundin

Selwyn

(2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008

33.

Liu

McKelroy

Kang

Harron

Liu

(2016). Examining the use of Facebook and Twitter as an additional social space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1120584

34.

Lowenthal

P. R.

Dunlap

J. C.

(2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476844

35.

Luo

Sickle

Cheng

(2017). Preservice teachers’ participation and perceptions of twitter live chats as personal learning networks. Tech Trends, 61, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0137-1

36.

Manuti

Pastore

Scardigno

A. F.

Giancaspro

M. L.

Morciano

(2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12044

37.

Mayring

(2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Retrieved March 10, 2005, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/02-00mayring-e.htm

38.

McKerlich

Riis

Anderson

Eastman

(2011). Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence in a virtual world. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 324. http://hdl.handle.net/2149/3519

39.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

40.

NASSP. (2019). Using mobile and social technologies in schools. Retrieved from https://www.nassp.org/policy-advocacy-center/nassp-position-statements/using-mobile-and-social-technologies-in-schools/

41.

Pai

Cole

Kovacs

Lee

Stovall

McGinnis

(2017). As long as you are here, can I interest in you some science? Increasing student engagement by co-opting a social networking site, Facebook for science discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517729505

42.

Popescu

Badea

(2020). Exploring a community of inquiry supported by a social media-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 61–76. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KthRKOk-nz0mWAK45mFxdOpJTKXYwUxS/view

43.

Potter

W. J.

Levine-Donnerstein

(1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539

44.

Prenger

Poortman

C. L.

Handelzalts

(2021). Professional learning networks: From teacher learning to school improvement? Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09383-2

45.

Reed

(2013). Hashtags and retweets: Using Twitter to aid community, communication and casual (informal) learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19692

46.

Rehm

Manca

Brandon

D. L.

Greenhow

(2019). Beyond disciplinary boundaries: Mapping educational science in the discourse on social media. Teachers College Record, 121(4), 1–24. Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/library

47.

Rehm

Notten

(2016). Twitter as an informal learning space for teachers!? The role of social capital in Twitter conversations among teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.015

48.

Remesal

Friesen

(2014). Inquiry into ‘communities of inquiry’: Knowledge, communication, presence, community. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.1

49.

Ricoy

M. C.

Feliz

(2016). Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 237–248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.237

50.

Rivers

C. M.

Lewis

B. L.

(2014). Ethical research standards in a world of big data. F1000Research, 3, http://f1000research.com/articles/3-38/v1

51.

Romero-Hall

(2017). Posting, sharing, networking, and connecting: Use of social media content by graduate students. TechTrends, 61(6), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0173-5

52.

Rosell-Aguilar

(2018). Twitter: A professional development and community of practice tool for teachers. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, article no. 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.452

53.

Rourke

Anderson

Garrison

D. R.

Archer

(1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l'ducation Distance, 14(2), 50–71. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92000/

54.

Rourke

Anderson

Garrison

D. R.

Archer

(2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 11(4.2), 1–18. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/92000/

55.

Saadatmand

Uhlin

Hedberg

Åbjörnsson

Kvarnström

(2017). Examining learners’ interaction in an open online course through the community of inquiry framework. The European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 20(1), 62–79. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1187832.pdf

56.

Sharma

Tietjen

(2016). Examining patterns of participation and meaning making in student blogs: A case study in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1119605

57.

Sinnappan

Farrell

Stewart

(2010). Priceless tweets! A study on twitter messages posted during crisis: Black Saturday. ACIS 2010 Proceedings, 39, http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010/39

58.

Sinnappan

Zutshi

. (2011). Using microblogging to facilitate community of inquiry: An Australian tertiary experience. In Williams

(Ed.), Changing demands, changing directions Proceedings ASCILITE 2011 (pp. 1123–1135). Hobart, Australia: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.

59.

Skrypnyk

Joksimović

Kovanović

(2015). Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC. International Review of Research in Online and Distance Learning, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2170/3347

60.

Stake

R. E.

(2005). Qualitative case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed, pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

61.

Swan

(2019). Social construction of knowledge and the community of inquiry framework. In Jung

(Ed.), Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 57–65). Singapore: Springer.

62.

Swan

Garrison

D. R.

Richardson

J. C.

(2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In Payne

C. R.

(Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). Pennsylvania: IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004

63.

Top Tools for Learning 2021 (2021). Results of the 15th Annual Survey published 1 September 2021. Retrieved from https://www.toptools4learning.com/twitter/

64.

Tufekci

(2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

65.

Williams

A. L.

Merten

M. J.

(2008). A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: Implications for future research and intervention. Adolescence, 43(170), 253–274.

66.

Yeh

H. C.

Tseng

S. S.

Chen

Y. S.

(2019). Using online peer feedback through blogs to promote speaking performance. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 1–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26558824

67.

Yin

R. K.

(2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed). Sage.