Building mechanisms-based, black box–free explanations is the main goal of analytical sociology. In this article, I offer some reasons to question whether some of the conceptual and methodological developments of the analytical community really serve this goal. Specifically, I argue that grounding our computer modeling practices in the current definition of mechanisms posits a serious risk of defining an ideal-typical research path that neglects the role that the understanding of the generative process must have for a black box–free explanation to be met. I propose some conceptual and methodological alternatives, and I identify some collective challenges that the analytical community should tackle in order not to deviate from its main goal.
AxtellRobert. 2000. “Why Agents? On the Varied Motivations for Agent Computing in the Social Sciences.” Pp. 3–25 in Proceedings for the Workshop on Agent Simulation: Applications, Models and Tools, October 15–16, 1999, edited by MacalC.SallachD.. Chicago: Chicago University and Argonne National Laboratory.
2.
BarberaFilippo. 2004. Meccanismi sociali: elementi di sociologia analitica. Bologna: Il mulino.
3.
BoudonRaymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. New York: Wiley & Sons.
4.
BoudonRaymond. 1976. “Comment on Hauser’s Review of Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology81(5):1175–87.
5.
BoudonRaymond. 1998. “Social Mechanisms without Black Boxes.” Pp. 172–203 in Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmP.SwedbergR.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BungeMario. 2000. La investigación científica: su estrategia y su filosofía. Barcelona: Siglo XXI.
7.
BungeMario. 2003. Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
8.
CedermanLars-Erik. 2005. “Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Process Theory.” American Journal of Sociology110(4):864–93.
9.
ChaseIvan D.LindquistW. Brent. 2009. “Dominance Hierarchies.” Pp. 566–91 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedstromP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
ColemanJamesKatzElihuMenzelHerbert. 1957. “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians.” Sociometry20(4):253–70.
11.
ConteRosaria. 2006. “From Simulation to Theory (and Backward).” Pp. 29–47 in Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences, edited by SquazzoniF.. Berlin: Springer.
12.
DemeulenaerePierre, ed. 2011. Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DeneubourgJean LouisGossS.AronSergePasteelsJacques M.. 1990. “The Self-organizing Exploratory Pattern of the Argentine Ant.” Journal of Insect Behavior3(2):159–68.
14.
DorigoMarcoStützleThomas. 2004. Ant Colony Optimization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
ElsterJon. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EpsteinJoshua M.2006a. “Agent-based Computational Models and Generative Social Science.” Pp. 4–46 in Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-based Computational Modeling, edited by EpsteinJ. M.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
EpsteinJoshua M.2006b. “Remarks on the Foundations of Agent-based Generative Social Science.” Handbook of Computational Economics2:1585–604.
18.
EpsteinJoshua M.AxtellRobert. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
EvansAndrewHeppenstallAllisonBirkinMark. 2013. “Understanding Simulation Results.” Pp. 173–95 in Simulating Social Complexity, edited by EdmondsB.MeyerR.. New York: Springer.
20.
FeldScottGrofmanBernard. 2009. “Homophily and the Focused Organization of Ties.” Pp. 521–43 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
GambettaDiego. 1987. Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?: Individual Decision Mechanisms in Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GarnierSimonGautraisJaquesTheraulazGuy. 2007. “The Biological Principles of Swarm Intelligence.” Swarm Intelligence1(1):3–31.
23.
GilbertNigelTroitzschKlaus. 2005. Simulation for the Social Scientist. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill International.
24.
GossSimonAronSergeDeneubourgJean LouisPasteelsJacques M.. 1989. “Self-organized Shortcuts in the Argentine Ant.” Naturwissenschaften76(12):579–81.
25.
GrossNeil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review74(3):358–79.
26.
HarréRom. 1972. The Philosophies of Science: An Introductory Survey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
HedströmPeter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HedströmPeter. 2008. “Studying Mechanisms to Strengthen Causal Inferences in Quantitative Research.” Pp. 319–35 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, eds. 2009a. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter. 2009b. “What Is Analytical Sociology All about? An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 3–24 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36:49–67.
34.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2014. “Analytical Sociology and Rational Choice Theory.” Pp. 57–70 in Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks, edited by ManzoG.. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
HumphreysPaul. 2009. “The Philosophical Novelty of Computer Simulation Methods.” Synthese169(3):615–26.
36.
IzquierdoLuis R.IzquierdoSegismundo S.GalánJosé ManuelSantosJosé Ignacio. 2009. “Techniques to Understand Computer Simulations: Markov Chain Analysis.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation12(1):6.
37.
MacyMichael W.FlacheAndreas. 2009. “Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-based Models of Social Interaction.” Pp. 245–68 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
ManzoGianluca. 2007a. “Comment on Andrew Abbott/2.” Sociologica1(2):1–8.
40.
ManzoGianluca. 2007b. “Progrès et ‘urgence’ de la modélisation en sociologie. du concept de ‘modèle générateur’ et de sa mise en Œuvre.” L’Année sociologique57(1):13–61.
41.
ManzoGianluca. 2010. “Analytical Sociology and Its Critics.” European Journal of Sociology51(1):129–70.
42.
ManzoGianluca. 2013. “Educational Choices and Social Interactions: A Formal Model and a Computational Test.” Comparative Social Research30:47–100.
43.
ManzoGianluca, ed. 2014a. Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
44.
ManzoGianluca. 2014b. “Data, Generative Models and Mechanisms: More on the Principles of Analytical Sociology.” Pp. 4–52 in Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks, edited by ManzoG.. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
ManzoGianlucaBaldassarriDelia. 2015. “Heuristics, Interactions, and Status Hierarchies. An Agent-based Model of Deference Exchange.” Sociological Methods & Research44(2):329–87.
46.
ManzoGianlucaMatthewsToby. 2014. “The Potential and Limitations of Agent-based Simulation.”Revue Française de Sociologie55(4):653–88.
MertonRobert King, ed. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
49.
NogueraJosé A., ed. 2006. “Analytical Sociological Theory.”Papers. Revista de Sociologia80.
50.
PodolnyJoelLynnFreda. 2009. “Status.” Pp. 554–65 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedstromP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
RailsbackSteven F.GrimmVolker. 2011. Agent-based and Individual-based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
SchellingThomas C.1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Toronto: WW Norton & Company.
53.
SquazzoniFlaminio. 2008. “The Micro-Macro Link in Social Simulation.” Sociologica2(1):1–26.
54.
TillyCharles. 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science4(1):21–41.
55.
WattsDuncanDoddsPeter. 2009. “Threshold Models of Social Influence.” Pp. 475–97 in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedstromP.BearmanP.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
