The fusion of gift giving and market exchange elements in economic transactions creates practical difficulties. How can the parties involved agree about the meaning of their engagement and the value of the exchanged objects? This article tackles the topic—an important one in economic sociology—by looking at moral transactions (i.e., transactions that combine pecuniary and ethical considerations). Through an empirical study of the issuance of Irish and Israeli diaspora bonds during the 1920s and 1950s, respectively, I identify practices that help actors overcome the difficulties inherent in moral transactions. Clarification practices allow actors to treat the exchange as either gift giving or market exchange. Blurring practices allow actors to complete a transaction without agreeing on its meaning. Blurring practices require creating a zone of indeterminacy, that is, a context in which the parties can cooperate without agreeing on their relationships. The broader implications of these practices are then discussed.
BandeljNina. 2002. “Embedded Economies: Social Relations as Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe.” Social Forces81:411–44.
2.
BandeljNina. 2008. “Economic Objects as Cultural Objects: Discourse on Foreign Investment in Post-Socialist Europe.” Socio-Economic Review6:671–702.
3.
Bird-DavidNuritDarrAsaf. 2009. “Commodity, Gift and Mass-Gift: On Gift-Commodity Hybrids in Advanced Mass Consumption Cultures.” Economy and Society38:304–325.
4.
BourdieuPierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BourdieuPierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
CallonMichel. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.
7.
CallonMichelLawJohn. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23:717–33.
8.
CallonMichelMéadelCécileRabeharisoaVololona. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society31:194–217.
9.
CallonMichelMuniesaFabian. 2005. “Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices.” Organization Studies26:1229–50.
10.
CarrollFrancis M.1985. “The American Commission on Irish Independence and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919.” Irish Studies in International Affairs2:103–18.
11.
CarrollFrancis M.2002. Money for Ireland: Finance, Diplomacy, Politics, and the First Dáil Éireann Loans, 1919-1936. Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
CarruthersBruce G.2005. “The Sociology of Money and Credit.” Pp. 355–78 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Second Edition, edited by SmelserN. J.SwedbergR.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
ChanderAnupam. 2001. “Diaspora Bonds.” New York University Law Review76:1005–99.
14.
DarrAsaf. 2003. “Gifting Practices and Interorganizational Relations: Constructing Obligation Networks in the Electronics Sector.” Sociological Forum18:31–51.
15.
DavisJohn. 1996. “An Anthropologist’s View of Exchange.” Social Anthropology4:213–26.
16.
DeesJ. GregoryAndersonBeth Battle. 2003. “Sector-Bending: Blurring Lines between Nonprofit and For-Profit.” Society40:16–27.
17.
DillonWilton. 2003. Gifts and Nations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
18.
DoorleyMichael. 2005. Irish-American Diaspora Nationalism: The Friends of Irish Freedom, 1916-1935. Dublin: Four Courts.
19.
FitzpatrickDavid. 2003. Harry Boland’s Irish Revolution. Cork: Cork University Press.
20.
GalisonPeter Louis. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.1964. “Awareness Contexts and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review29:669–79.
22.
GranovetterMark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology91:481–510.
23.
GusevaAlyaRona-TasAkos. 2001. “Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Russian and American Credit Card Markets Compared.” American Sociological Review66:623–46.
24.
HayduJeffrey. 1998. “Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and as Sequences of Problem Solving.” American Journal of Sociology104:339–71.
25.
HealyKieran Joseph. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HerrmannGretchen M.1997. “Gift or Commodity: What Changes Hands in the U. S. Garage Sale?” American Ethnologist24:910–30.
27.
HerrmannGretchen M.2003. “Negotiating Culture: Conflict and Consensus in US Garage-Sale Bargaining.” Ethnology42:237–52.
28.
HomerSidneySyllaRichard. 1996. A History of Interest Rates, Third Edition. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29.
KetkarSuhasRathaDilip. 2009. Innovative Financing for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
Knorr CetinaKarin. 2009. “The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction32:61–87.
31.
Lainer-VosDan. 2012. “Manufacturing National Attachments: Gift-Giving, Market Exchange and the Construction of Irish and Zionist Diaspora Bonds.” Theory and Society41:73–106.
32.
Lainer-VosDan. 2013. Sinews of the Nation: Constructing Irish and Zionist Bonds in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33.
LatourBruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
LehrmanHal. 1949. “The Economic Test Facing Israel.” Commentary7:513–23.
35.
LehrmanHal. 1950. “Turning Point in Jewish Philanthropy?” Commentary10:201–14.
36.
LeiferEric M.1988. “Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action.” American Sociological Review53:865–78.
37.
LlewellynNick. 2011a. “The Delicacy of the Gift: Passing Donations and Leaving Change.” Discourse & Society22:155–74.
38.
LlewellynNick. 2011b. “The Gift in Interaction: A Study of ‘Picking-Up the Bill.’” British Journal of Sociology62:718–38.
39.
MacKenzieDonaldMilloYuval. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology109:107–45.
40.
MallardGrégoire. 2011. “The Gift Revisited: Marcel Mauss on War, Debt, and the Politics of Reparations.” Sociological Theory29:225–47.
41.
MaussMarcel. 1967. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York: Norton.
42.
McCartanPatrick. 1932. With De Valera in America. New York: Brentano.
43.
MilloYuvalMacKenzieDonald. 2009. “The Usefulness of Inaccurate Models: Towards an Understanding of the Emergence of Financial Risk Management.” Accounting, Organizations and Society34:638–53.
44.
NickelPatricia MooneyEikenberryAngela M. 2009. “A Critique of the Discourse of Marketized Philanthropy.” American Behavioral Scientist52:974–89.
45.
OfferAvner. 1997. “Between the Gift and the Market: The Economy of Regard.” Economic History Review50:450–76.
46.
PadgettJohn F.AnsellChristopher K.1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434.” American Journal of Sociology98:1259–319.
47.
PeiferJared L.2011. “Morality in the Financial Market? A Look at Religiously Affiliated Mutual Funds in the USA.” Socio-Economic Review9:235–59.
48.
PolanyiKarl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
49.
RaphaelMarc Lee. 1982. A History of the United Jewish Appeal, 1939-1982. Chino, CA: Scholars Press.
50.
RaphaelMarc Lee. 1989. Abba Hillel Silver: A Profile in American Judaism. New York: Holmes & Meier.
51.
RehaviYehielWeingartenAsher. 2004. Fifty Years of External Finance via State of Israel Non-Negotiable Bonds. Jerusalem: Bank of Israel.
52.
SchwartzBarry. 1967. “The Social Psychology of the Gift.” American Journal of Sociology73:1–11.
53.
SilberIlana F.1998. “Modern Philanthropy: Reassessing the Viability of a Maussian Perspective.”Pp. 134–50 in Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute, edited by JamesW.AllenN. J.New York: Berghahn Books.
54.
SilberIlana F.2009. “Bourdieu’s Gift to Gift Theory: An Unacknowledged Trajectory.” Sociological Theory27:173–90.
55.
SimmelGeorg. 1984. “Flirtation.” Pp. 133–52 in Georg Simmel, On Women, Sexuality, and Love, edited by OakesG.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
SimmelGeorg. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
57.
SmithAdam. 2001. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Electric Book Co.
58.
StarSusan Leigh. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values35:601–617.
59.
StarSusan LeighGriesemerJames R. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science19:387–420.
60.
StarkDavid. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
StockErnest. 1987. Partners & Pursestrings: A History of the United Israel Appeal. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
62.
TansillCharles Callan. 1957. America and the Fight for Irish Freedom, 1866-1922: An Old Story Based upon New Data. New York: Devin-Adair Co.
63.
TavoryIddo. 2009. “The Structure of Flirtation: On the Construction of Interactional Ambiguity.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction33:69–74.
64.
TavoryIddo. 2011. “The Question of Moral Action: A Formalist Position.” Sociological Theory29:272–93.
65.
TurowetzJason J.MaynardDouglas W.2010. “Morality in the Social Interactional and Discursive World of Everyday Life.” Pp. 503–26 in Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, edited by HitlinS.VaiseyS.New York: Springer.
66.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
UzziBrian. 1999. “Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing.” American Sociological Review64:481–505.
68.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114:1675–715.
69.
ZeissRagnaGroenewegenPeter. 2009. “Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement.” Organization16:81–100.
70.
ZelizerViviana A.2005. “Circuits within Capitalism.” Pp. 289–321 in The Economic Sociology of Capitalism, edited by NeeV.SwedbergR.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
ZelizerViviana A.1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.
72.
ZelizerViviana A.1996. “Payments and Social Ties.” Sociological Forum11:481–95.
73.
ZelizerViviana A.2000. “How Do We Know Whether a Monetary Transaction Is a Gift, an Entitlement, or Compensation?” Pp. 329–33 in Economics, Values, and Organization, edited by Ben-NerA.PuttermanL.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
ZelizerViviana A.2012. “How I Became a Relational Economic Sociologist and What Does That Mean?” Politics & Society40:145–174.
