The purpose of this study was to examine inefficiency in gift giving, and in particular, the "deadweight loss" that results from giving apparel gifts to college students. Deadweight losses from gift giving were calculated using gift recipients' estimates of gift cost and gift valuations, for both December holiday and Valentine's Day gifts. Probit models were used to estimate the likelihood of receiving apparel gifts and the likelihood of receiving cash gifts. OLS regression was used to investigate the impact of gift cost, gift type, gift occasion and giver's relationship to recipient on gift value. Findings suggest that deadweight loss is a function of giver's relationship to recipient and gift type. Gifts received from parents, siblings, significant others and friends were shown to be more efficient than gifts received from aunts, uncles, cousins and grandparents. The deadweight loss resulting from apparel gifts was shown to be significantly greater than the deadweight loss resulting from cash gifts and all other types of gifts, except perfume.
Athay, S. (1993). Giving and getting. American Demographics , 15(12), 46-54.
2.
Banks, S.K. (1979). Gift-giving: A review and an interactive paradigm . In W. L. Wilkie (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 6, (pp. 319-324). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
3.
Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 1063-1093.
4.
Belk, R.W. (1979). Gift-Giving behavior. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.), Research in Marketing, 2, (pp. 95-126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
Belk, R.W. (1982). Effects of gift-giving involvement on gift selection strategies. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 9, (pp. 408-412). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
6.
Belk, R.W., & Coon, G.S. (1991). Can't buy me love: Dating, money, and gifts. In R. R. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 18, (pp. 521-527). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
7.
Burgoyne, C.B., & Routh, D.A. (1991). Constraints on the use of money as a gift at Christmas: The role of status and intimacy. Journal of EconomicPhilosophy , 12 (1), 47-69.
8.
Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S180-S214.
9.
Cameron, S. (1989). The unacceptability of money as a gift and its status as a medium of exchange. Journal of Economic Philosophy , 10 (2), 383-392.
10.
Caplow, T. (1982). Christmas gifts and kin networks. American Sociological Review, 47, 383-392.
11.
Carrier, J. (1990). Gifts in the world of commodities: The ideology of the perfect gift in American society. Journal of Cultural and Social Practice, 29, 19-37.
12.
Cheal, D. (1987). Showing them you love them: Gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy. Sociological Review, 35(1), 150-169.
13.
DeVere, S.P., Scott, C.D., & Shulby, W.L. (1983). Consumer perceptions of gift-giving occasions: Attribute saliency and structure. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 10, (pp. 185-190). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
14.
Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods. New York : Basic Book.
15.
Hill, C., & Romm, C.T. (1993). Gift-giving family styles: A cross-cultural analysis . Working paper No. 5-93, University of Wollongong, Department of Management, Wollongong , Australia.
16.
Home, L., & Winakor, G. (1991). A conceptual framework for the gift-giving process: Implications for clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9(4), 23-33.
17.
Home, L., & Winakor, G. (1995). Giving gifts of clothing: Risk perceptions of husbands and wives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 13(2), 92-101.
18.
Kinsey, J. (1984). Probit and tobit analysis in consumer research . In K. P. Goebel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of American Council on Consumer Interests, (pp. 155-161). Atlanta, GA: American Council on Consumer Interests.
19.
Knetsch, J.L., & Sinden, J.A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(3), 507-521.
20.
Krotz, J.L. (1990). The new rules for gift giving. Money, 11, 136-143.
21.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. (J. H. Bell, J. R. von Sturmer, &R. Needham, Trans.). Boston : Beacon Press. (Original work published 1949).
22.
Lowes, B., Turner, J., & Wills, G. (1971). Patterns of gift giving. In G. Wills (Ed.), Exploration in Marketing Thought (pp. 82-102). London: Bradford University Press.
23.
Manikowske, L. (1993). Clothing gift giving from mothers to children, ages 8 to 12. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.
24.
Mauss, M. (1967). The gift. (I. Cunnison, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1925).
25.
Netemeyer, R.G., Andrews, J.C., & Durvasula, S. (1993). A comparison of three behavioral intention models: The case of Valentine's Day gift giving. In L. McAlister & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 20, (pp. 135-141). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
26.
Rucker, M.H., Leckliter, L., Kivel, S., Dinkel, M., Freitas, T., Wynes, M., & Prato, H. (1991). When the thought counts: Friendship, love, gift exchanges and gift returns. In R. R. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 18, (pp. 528-531). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
27.
Rucker, M.H., Balch, T., Higham, F., & Schenter, K. (1992). Thanks but no thanks: Rejection, possession and disposition of the failed gift. In J. F. Sherry , Jr. & B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 19, (pp. 488). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
28.
Ryans, A.B. (1977). Consumer gift buying behavior: An exploratory analysis. In O. Bellinger & B. Greenberg (Eds.), Contemporary Marketing Thought, 44, (pp. 99104). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
29.
Sahlins, M.D. (1972). Stone Age Econometrics. Chicago : Aldine.
30.
Sherry, J.D. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157-168.
31.
Sherry, J.D., McGrath, M.A., & Levy, S.J. (1993). The dark side of the gift. Journal of Business Research, 28, 225-244.
32.
Valentine's Day. (1994, February 4). The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
33.
Wagner, J., Ettenson, R., & Verrier, S. (1990). The effect of donor-recipient involvement on consumer gift decisions. In L. McAlister & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 20, (pp. 515-519). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
34.
Wagner, J., & Garner, T. (1993). Extrahousehold giving in popular gift categories: A socioeconomic and demographic analysis. In M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 17, (pp. 683-689). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
35.
Waldfogel, J. (1993). The deadweight loss of Christmas. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1328-1336.
36.
Waldrop, J. (1994). Happy Kwanzaa. American Demographics , 16(12), 4.
37.
Webley, P., Lea, S.E.G., & Portalska, R. (1983). The unacceptability of money as a gift. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 223-238.
38.
Webley, P., & Wilson, R. (1989). Social relationships and the unacceptability of money as a gift. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(1), 85-91.
