In this study, aqueous film-forming foam, fluoroprotein foam, and synthetic foam were applied to extinguish the transformer oil pool fires. The fire-extinguishing performance and burn-back resistance were investigated using a laboratory fire-extinguishing system. Moreover, the emission products were analyzed to evaluate the gas-phase pollution characteristics. Results show that aqueous film-forming foam presents the highest fire-extinguishing efficiency, while fluoroprotein foam has the best burn-back performance. Flue gas and gas chromatography–mass spectrometer analyses demonstrate that the use of fluoroprotein foam results in much higher CO emissions than other foams, and the pollutants are mainly from various hydrocarbons produced by incomplete combustion of transformer oil. Synthetic foam and aqueous film-forming foam lead to higher SO2 and NO emissions, and pollutants are mainly dominated by alcohols and ethers. Noteworthily, when using aqueous film-forming foam to extinguish oil pool fire, a persistent organic pollutant, perfluorooctanoic acid, is detected in the gas phase.
ZhangBSZhangJQHuangY, et al. Burning process and fire characteristics of transformer oil: a study focusing on the effects of oil type. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 139: 1839–1848.
2.
ZhaoJWangSZhangJ, et al. Experimental study on the burning characteristics of transformer oil pool fires. Energ Fuel2020; 34: 4967–4976.
3.
RakowskaJ. Best practices for selection and application of firefighting foam. In: 2018 international conference on fire and environmental safety engineering (FESE 2018), Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine, 7–8 November 2018.
4.
XuZSGuoXYanL, et al. Fire-extinguishing performance and mechanism of aqueous film-forming foam in diesel pool fire. Case Stud Therm Eng2020; 17: 100578.
5.
WangS. Research on aqueous film-forming foam concentrate formulations and properties. In: 2019 5th international conference on energy materials and environment engineering (ICEMEE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–14 April 2019.
6.
WangBWHuangSSHeQZ, et al. AFFF spread over liquid surface under external radiation conditions. In: 2019 9th international conference on future environment and energy (ICFEE), Osaka, Japan, 9–11 January 2019.
7.
RanjbarHShahrakiBH.Effect of aqueous film-forming foams on the evaporation rate of hydrocarbon fuels. Chem Eng Technol2013; 36: 295–299.
8.
KishiTAraiM.Study on the generation of perfluorooctane sulfonate from the aqueous film-forming foam. J Hazard Mater2008; 159: 81–86.
9.
XiaoFSasiPCAlinezhadA, et al. Thermal decomposition of anionic, zwitterionic, and cationic polyfluoroalkyl substances in aqueous film-forming foams. Environ Sci Technol2021; 55: 9885–9894.
10.
BaabishASobhaneiSFiedlerH.Priority perfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters—a snapshot survey from 22 developing countries. Chemosphere2021; 273: 129612.
11.
HoutzEFHigginsCPFieldJA, et al. Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil. Environ Sci Technol2013; 47: 8187–8195.
12.
LiuZLuYWangP, et al. Pollution pathways and release estimation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in central and eastern China. Sci Total Environ2017; 580: 1247–1256.
13.
KrólBProchaskaKChrzanowskiŁ. Biodegradability of firefighting foams. Fire Technol2012; 48(2): 173–181.
14.
MontagnolliRNMatos LopesPRMatos CruzJ, et al. The effects of fluoride based fire-fighting foams on soil microbiota activity and plant growth during natural attenuation of perfluorinated compounds. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol2017; 50: 119–127.
15.
BursianSJLinkJEMcCartyM, et al. The subacute toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate and/or perfluorooctanoic acid and legacy aqueous film-forming foams to Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) chicks. Environ Toxicol Chem2021; 40: 695–710.
16.
SubSCJeongHJ.The extinguishing characteristics by fluidity variation of protein foam extinguishing agent. J Korean Soc Saf2014; 29: 18–23.
17.
ZhaoMNiXMZhangSG, et al. Improving the performance of fluoroprotein foam in extinguishing gasoline pool fires with addition of bromofluoropropene. Fire Mater2016; 40: 261–272.
18.
TangBHWuZL.Oleophobic modification of hollow glass microspheres and its effect on the foaming capacity and stability of foam extinguishing agent. J Chem2015; 2015: 923894.
19.
ZhangXZBaoZMHuC, et al. Organic pollutant loading and biodegradability of firefighting foam. In: 3rd international conference on energy, environment and materials science (EEMS 2017), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Singapore, 28–30 July 2017.
20.
YangBDuYBiT, et al. Contribution of dissolved organic matter to chemical oxygen demand in three Chinese lakes and in treated sewage. Int J Environ Sci Technol2019; 16: 7861–7868.
21.
WangWZhangXZhangYH, et al. Adsorption of emerging sodium p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzene sulfonate (OBS) onto soils: kinetics, isotherms and mechanisms. Pedosphere2021; 31: 596–605.
22.
ZhouLHeSShiY, et al. Tissue distribution of sodium p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzene sulfonate (OBS) in mice via oral exposure. Environ Int2022; 165: 107289.
23.
LiZZhuHZhaoJ, et al. Experimental research on the effectiveness of different types of foam of extinguishing methanol/diesel pool fires. Combust Sci Technol. Epub ahead of print 18 September 2022. DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2022.2125306.
24.
RieD-HLeeJ-WKimS.Class B fire-extinguishing performance evaluation of a compressed air foam system at different air-to-aqueous foam solution mixing ratios. Appl Sci2016; 6: 191.
25.
KrólBProchaskaKChrzanowskiŁ.Biodegradability of firefighting foams. Fire Technol2012; 48: 173–181.
26.
RotanderATomsLMAylwardL, et al. Elevated levels of PFOS and PFHxS in firefighters exposed to aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). Environ Int2015; 82: 28–34.
27.
RothJAbusalloutIHillT, et al. Release of volatile per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film-forming foam. Environ Sci Technol Lett2020; 7: 164–170.
28.
ZhangJQGuoYPauD, et al. Pyrolysis kinetics and determination of organic components and N-alkanes yields of Karamay transformer oil using TG, FTIR and Py-GC/MS analyses. Fuel2021; 306: 121691.
BeylerCCrocePDubayC, et al. Oxygen consumption calorimetry, William Parker: 2016 DiNenno Prize. Fire Sci Rev2017; 6: 1.
31.
WangKFangJShahHR, et al. A theoretical and experimental study of extinguishing compressed air foam on an n-heptane storage tank fire with variable fuel thickness. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 138: 117–129.
32.
ChenTFuXCBaoZM, et al. Experimental study on the extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam sprinkler system on oil pool fire. Procedia Eng2018; 211: 94–103.
33.
MagrabiSADlugogorskiBZJamesonGJ.A comparative study of drainage characteristics in AFFF and FFFP compressed-air fire-fighting foams. Fire Saf J2002; 37: 21–52.
34.
RivaiMHambaliESuryaniA, et al. Formulation and performance test of palm-based foaming agent concentrate for fire extinguisher application. In: 2nd international conference on biomass: toward sustainable biomass utilization for industrial and energy applications, Bogor, Indonesia, 24–25 July 2017.
35.
ZhaoHTongJZhaoJ, et al. Failure characteristic of class 1E electrical cable used in the nuclear power plant exposed to fire. Prog Nucl Energy2022; 150: 104292.
36.
DingFXKangWDYanL, et al. Influence of gas-liquid ratio on the fire-extinguishing efficiency of compressed gas protein foam in diesel pool fire. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 146: 1465–1472.
37.
RakowskaJRadwanKSlosorzZ, et al. Selection of surfactants on the basis of foam and emulsion properties to obtain the fire fighting foam and the degreasing agent. Tenside Surfact Det2014; 51: 215–219.
38.
ShengYJLuSXXuMJ, et al. Effect of Xanthan gum on the performance of aqueous film-forming foam. J Dispersion Sci Technol2016; 37: 1664–1670.
39.
BackGG.An evaluation of the firefighting effectiveness of fluorine-free foams. Fire Technol2021; 57: 2077–2078.
40.
EungwooLSubSC.Characteristics of protein foam agent by stabilizer on the ship fire extinguishment. J Korean Soc Saf2015; 30: 79–85.
41.
YangYWFangJQShaM, et al. Study on foam extinguishing agent based on mixed system of branched short-chain fluorocarbon anionic and hydrocarbon cationic surfactants. J Dispersion Sci Technol. Epub ahead of print 17 August 2021. DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2021.1957923.
42.
RudrannaNRajanJS.Modeling of copper sulphide migration in paper oil insulation of transformers. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul2012; 19: 1642–1649.
43.
CellekMS.Flameless combustion investigation of CH4/H2 in the laboratory-scaled furnace. Int J Hydrog Energy2020; 45: 35208–35222.
44.
ZajemskaMPoskartAMusiałD.The kinetics of nitrogen oxides formation in the flame gas. Econ Environ Stud2015; 15: 445–460.
45.
LamSSRussellADChaseHA.Pyrolysis using microwave heating: a sustainable process for recycling used car engine oil. Ind Eng Chem Res2010; 49: 10845–10851.
46.
LamSSRussellADLeeCL, et al. Microwave-heated pyrolysis of waste automotive engine oil: influence of operation parameters on the yield, composition, and fuel properties of pyrolysis oil. Fuel2012; 92: 327–339.
47.
DessauRM.On the H-ZSM-5 catalyzed formation of ethylene from methanol or higher olefins. J Catal1986; 99: 111–116.
48.
DessauRMLaPierreRB.On the mechanism of methanol conversion to hydrocarbons over HZSM-5. J Catal1982; 78: 136–141.
49.
VieiraPAVieiraRBFariaS, et al. Biodegradation of diesel oil and gasoline contaminated effluent employing intermittent aeration. J Hazard Mater2009; 168: 1366–1372.
50.
GancarczykDSobolewskiMJakubiecJ.Evaluation of the biodegradability of foam concentrates and wetting agents. Rocz Ochr Srodowiska2018; 20: 1199–1218.
51.
PlaceBJFieldJA.Identification of novel fluorochemicals in aqueous film-forming foams used by the US military. Environ Sci Technol2012; 46: 7120–7127.
