The cables have to meet regulations to be used in buildings. In Europe, they are evaluated according to large- and small-scale tests (e.g. EN 50399 and IEC 60332-). They can be time- and material-consuming. In this study, a novel bench-scale fire testing method was developed only considering the external sheathing/jacket. Flat specimen of materials used as cables’ sheathing was impacted by a methane burner, and the heat release rate and the flame spread were measured. Good correlations on five benchmark materials were found between the classifications at the large scale (EN 50399) compared to those measured at the reduced scale. Using the bench-scale test, optimized formulations were developed.
European Union. Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, 2011.
2.
OJ No L 88, 4April2011, p. 5.
3.
EN 13501-2:2007. Fire classification of construction products and building elements.
4.
ISO 1716:2010. Reaction to fire tests for products—determination of the gross heat of combustion (calorific value).
5.
EN 50399:2011. Common test methods for cables under fire conditions. Heat release and smoke production measurement on cables during flame spread test. Test apparatus, procedures, results.
6.
EN 60332-1-2:2004. Tests on electric and optical fibre cables under fire conditions—part 1-2: test for vertical flame propagation for a single insulated wire or cable—procedure for 1 kW pre-mixed flame.
7.
GraysonSJVan HeesPGreenAM. Assessing the fire performance of electric cables (FIPEC). Fire Mater2001; 25: 49–60.
8.
FIPEC-new test methods and measurements techniques – Final Report on the European Commission SMT Programme SMT4-CT96-2059, 410pp, ISBN 0 9532312 5 9, London, 2000.
9.
Prediction of fire classification of cables, extended application of test data. In: Interflam conference proceedings, Nottingham, 5–7 July 2010, pp. 439–450. London: Interscience CommunicationsLtd.
10.
JourneauxTSundströmBJohanssonP. CEMAC–CE-marking of cables. SP report 2010:27, 165p. ISBN 978-91-86319-65-6, Borås, 2010.
11.
FörsthMSjöströmJWickströmU. Characterization of the thermal exposure in the en 50399 cable test apparatus. In: 14th international conference and exhibition on fire and materials, San Francisco, CA, 2–4 February 2015, pp. 23–37. London: Interscience Communications Ltd.
12.
GalloEStöckleinWSchartelB. Development of a new intermediate scale method for assessing cables reaction to fire according CPR. In: 62nd international wire & cable symposium conference, Charlotte, NC, 10–13 November 2013.
13.
GalloEStöckleinWSchartelB. Assessing cable reaction to fire by new intermediate-scale method. In: 15th European meeting on fire retardancy and protection of materials, Berlin, 22–25 June 2015.
14.
ISO 5660-1:2015. Reaction-to-fire tests—heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate—part 1: heat release rate (cone calorimeter method) and smoke production rate (dynamic measurement).
15.
TsaiK-C. Using cone calorimeter data for the prediction of upward flame spread rate. J Therm Anal Calorim2012; 112: 1601–1606.
16.
MerryweatherGSpearpointMJ. Flame spread measurements on wood products using the ASTM E1321 LIFT apparatus and a reduced scale adaptation of the cone calorimeter. Fire Mater2009; 34: 109–136.
17.
HuggettC. Estimation of rate of heat release by means of oxygen consumption measurements. Fire Mater1980; 4: 61–65.
18.
ParkerWJ. Calculations of the heat release rate by oxygen consumption for various applications. J Fire Sci1984; 2: 380–395.
19.
JanssensML. Measuring rate of heat release by oxygen consumption. Fire Technol1991; 27: 234–249.
20.
BabrauskasV. Development of the cone calorimeter—a bench-scale heat release rate apparatus based on oxygen consumption. Fire Mater1984; 8: 81–95.
21.
SchartelBHullTR. Development of fire-retarded materials—interpretation of cone calorimeter data. Fire Mater2007; 31: 327–354.
22.
LinterisGT. Numerical simulations of polymer pyrolysis rate: effect of property variations. Fire Mater2011; 35: 463–480.
23.
GuillaumeEMarquisDSaragozaL. Uncertainty on heat release rate measurement with cone calorimeter during the combustion of a material. Rev Fr Métrol2012; 31(3): 3–11.
24.
BabrauskasV. The cone calorimeter. In: HurleyMJGottukDTHallJR. (eds) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2008, pp. 952–980.
25.
GyppazF. Flame spread behavior of electric cables: round-robin characterization of the IEC/EN 60332-1 tests. J Fire Sci2012; 30: 404–412.
26.
IEC 60695-9-2:2014. Fire hazard testing—part 9-2: Surface spread of flame—summary and relevance of test methods.
