Based on social information processing (SIP) theory, this study examines the relationship between supervisor developmental feedback and civil servants’ taking-charge behavior by exploring the mediating role of responsibility awareness and the moderating role of workplace inclusion. A multi-wave field study was conducted with data collected from 229 civil servants working in four local government institutions in China. The results show that supervisor developmental feedback is positively related to civil servants’ taking-charge behavior by increasing the perception of constructive responsibility. In addition, we found that workplace inclusion moderates not only the relationship between constructive responsibility perception and taking-charge behavior but also the indirect relationship between supervisor developmental feedback and taking-charge behavior via the constructive responsibility perception. The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in light of their implications for future research and practice.
AlangT.StantonP.RoseM. (2022). Enhancing employee voice and inclusion through inclusive leadership in public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 51(3), 309–329.
2.
AndrewsR.AshworthR. (2015). Representation and inclusion in public organizations: Evidence from the UK civil service. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 279–288.
3.
AshikaliT.GroeneveldS.KuipersB. (2021). The role of inclusive leadership in supporting an inclusive climate in diverse public sector teams. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 497–519.
4.
BediA.AlpaslanC. M.GreenS. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
5.
BermanE.WangC.-Y.ChenC.-A.WangX.LovrichN.JanC.-y.JingY.LiuW.GomesR.SoncoJ. T. (2013). Public executive leadership in east and west: An examination of HRM factors in eight countries. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 164–184.
6.
BeshearsJ.KosowskyH. (2020). Nudging: Progress to date and future directions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 3–19.
7.
BlijlevenW.van HulstM. (2022). Encounters with the organisation: how local civil servants experience and handle tensions in public engagement. Local Government Studies, 48(3), 615–639.
8.
BouwensA.StephensonK. A.El BaroudiS.KhapovaS. N.GorbatovS. (2025). Negative feedback as a necessary evil: Unpacking the role of the organization's social context. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication.
9.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology (pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
10.
BrysonJ. M.QuickK. S.SlotterbackC. S.CrosbyB. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34.
11.
ChenD.ZhangY.AhmadA. B.LiuB. (2023). How to fuel public employees’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A two-wave moderated mediation study. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 185–208.
12.
ChiaburuD. S.BakerV. L. (2006). Extra-role behaviors challenging the status-quo: Validity and antecedents of taking charge behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 620–637.
13.
DengH.WalterF.GuanY. (2020). Supervisor-directed emotional labor as upward influence: An emotions-as-social-information perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 384–402.
14.
DetertJ. R.EdmondsonA. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488.
15.
FangY.LiuY.ChenN. (2024). Supervisor developmental feedback and employees' proactive innovation behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 52(10), 1–10.
FullerJ. B.MarlerL. E.HesterK. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8), 1089–1120.
18.
GokK.BabalolaM. T.LakshmanC.SumanthJ. J.VoL. C.DecosterS.BansalA.CoşkunA. (2023). Enhancing employees' duty orientation and moral potency: Dual mechanisms linking ethical psychological climate to ethically focused proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 157–175.
19.
GongZ.LiuM.XinD.GilalF. G.YinK.ZhangN. (2019). Coworker feedback seeking and feedback environment in China: An expectation states theory approach. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 47(9), 1–10.
20.
Gould-WilliamsJ. S.MostafaA. M. S.BottomleyP. (2015). Public service motivation and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector: Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 597–622.
21.
HiggsM. J.KuipersB. S.SteijnB. (2023). Change leadership and change embeddedness in public organizations: Connecting macrolevel reform to microlevel implementation. Public Administration, 101(3), 902–916.
22.
HombergF.VogelR.WeiherlJ. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1), 28–47.
23.
JaworskiB. J.KohliA. K. (1991). Supervisory feedback: Alternative types and their impact on salespeople's performance and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 190–201.
24.
JooB. K.SongJ. H.LimD. H.YoonS. W. (2012). Team creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, developmental feedback and team cohesion. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(2), 77–91.
25.
JungblutM.JungblutJ. (2022). Do organizational differences matter for the use of social media by public organizations? A computational analysis of the way the German police use Twitter for external communication. Public Administration, 100(4), 821–840.
26.
KimS. S.PakJ.SonS. Y. (2023). Do calling-oriented employees take charge in organizations? The role of supervisor close monitoring, intrinsic motivation, and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 140, 103812.
27.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ.-L.ChenZ. X.LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.
28.
KoK.HanL. (2013). An empirical study on public service motivation of the next generation civil servants in China. Public Personnel Management, 42(2), 191–222.
29.
KossekE. E.HuangJ. L.PiszczekM. M.FleenorJ. W.RudermanM. (2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects.Human Resource Management,56(1), 151–172.
30.
LavignaR. J. (1992). Predicting job performance from background characteristics: More evidence from the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 21(3), 347–362.
31.
LeeD. S.ParkS. (2021). Civil servants’ perceptions of agency heads’ leadership styles: The role of gender in public sector organizations. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1160–1183.
32.
LiL. C. (2010). Central-local relations in the People's Republic of China: Trends, processes and impacts for policy implementation. Public Administration and Development, 30(3), 177–190.
33.
LiR.ZhangZ. Y.TianX. M. (2016). Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 758–781.
34.
LiY.PereraS.KulikC. T.MetzI. (2019). Inclusion climate: A multilevel investigation of its antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 353–369.
35.
LiangJ.FarhC. I.FarhJ.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.
36.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
37.
LondonM. (1993). Relationships between career motivation, empowerment and support for career development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66(1), 55–69.
38.
MalikP. (2024). Individual-focused transformational leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating and moderating mechanisms of job crafting and employee resilience. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(1), 90–113.
39.
MishraS. S.KasimJ. J. (2023). Team culture, employee commitment and job performance in public sectors: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(2), 351–367.
40.
MorgansonV. J.MajorD. A.ObornK. L.VeriveJ. M.HeelanM. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 578-595.
41.
MorrisonE. W.PhelpsC. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
42.
NeterJ.KutnerM. H.NachtsheimC. J.WassermanW. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill.
43.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021
44.
RandelA. E. (2023). Inclusion in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Group & Organization Management, 10596011231175578.
45.
RouziA.WangY. (2021). Feeling trusted and taking-charge behaviour: An internal branding perspective based on self-categorization theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102831.
46.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
47.
SongY.PengP.HuX.YuG. (2023). Meaning matters: Exploring the impact of expatriates’ meaning in life on taking charge behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.138bp
48.
SteenT.SchottC. (2019). Public sector employees in a challenging work environment. Public Administration, 97(1), 3–10.
49.
SuW.LinX.DingH. (2019). The influence of supervisor developmental feedback on employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1581.
50.
TaylorS. E.CrockerJ. (2022). Schematic bases of social information processing. In Social cognition (pp. 89–134). Routledge.
51.
Van LoonN. M. (2017). From red tape to which performance results? Exploring the relationship between red tape and various dimensions of performance in healthcare work units. Public Administration, 95(1), 60–77.
52.
Van StrydonckI.DecramerA.PecceiR.AudenaertM. (2023). Process and content in performance management: How consistency and supervisor developmental feedback decrease emotional exhaustion via high-quality LMX. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X231220938.
53.
VidèF.MicacchiL.BarbieriM.ValottiG. (2023). The renaissance of performance appraisal: Engaging public employees through perceived developmental purpose and justice. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(4), 623–651.
54.
WadeiK. A.ChenL.FrempongJ.AppientiW. A. (2021). The mediation effect of ethical leadership and creative performance: A social information processing perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 241–254.
55.
WangQ.ZhouX.BaoJ.ZhangX.JuW. (2020). How is ethical leadership linked to subordinate taking charge? A moderated mediation model of social exchange and power distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 315.
56.
WangY.XieY.LiuM.GuoY.HeD. (2024). Silent majority: How employees’ perceptions of corporate hypocrisy are related to their silence. Journal of Business Ethics, 195(2), 315–334.
YuanS.ChenZ.SunM. (2022). Discretion: Whether and how does it promote street-level bureaucrats' taking charge behavior?Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 805872.
59.
ZalesnyM. D.FordJ. K. (1990). Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(2), 205–246.
60.
ZarychtaA.GrillosT.AnderssonK. P. (2020). Public sector governance reform and the motivation of street-level bureaucrats in developing countries. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 75–91.
61.
ZhangJ.GillC. (2019). Leader–follower guanxi: an invisible hand of cronyism in Chinese management.Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(3), 322–344.
62.
ZhengX.DiazI.JingY.ChiaburuD. S. (2015). Positive and negative supervisor developmental feedback and task-performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(2), 212–232.
63.
ZhouJ. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422.
64.
ZhuF.YangN.ChenX. (2022). The influence of organizational virtues on employees’ constructive behavior: The role of constructive responsibility perception and proactive personality. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(4), 719–736.
65.
ZhuX.DuJ. (2023). My superior’s appreciation, my subordinates’ promotion: experimental evidence of a promotion decision model of middle-level bureaucrats in China. International Public Management Journal, 27(4), 485–570.
66.
ZhuY.AkhtarS. (2019). Leader trait learning goal orientation and employee voice behavior: the mediating role of managerial openness and the moderating role of felt obligation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(20), 2876–2900.
