Contemporary public management research has focused heavily on the consequences of public service motivation (PSM). However, only a handful of studies have been conducted to develop context-indifferent measurement scales that reflect the nature of this central concept, which ranges along a continuum from controlled to autonomous motivation. This study proposes a new PSM model grounded in self-determination theory (SDT) and empirically validates two behavioral elements for the SDT-based PSM using data from Guangdong Province of China. Specifically, it is found that (1) the withdrawal behavior of public employees is positively influenced by their external PSM, negatively associated with identified and introjected PSM, and independent of intrinsic and integrated PSM; (2) there are positive relationships between introjected-, intrinsic-, identified-PSM, and taking-charge behavior; and (3) integrated and external PSM do not show significant outcome effects. Acknowledging that different motivational dimensions underlying the SDT-based PSM vary in their importance to the stimulation of withdrawal and taking-charge behaviors, the paper concludes with a future agenda for SDT- and PSM-related research that can be furthered in a manner that enriches theory or illuminates practice.
AndersenL. B.PallesenT.Holm PedersenL. (2011). Does ownership matter? Public service motivation among physiotherapists in the private and public sectors in Denmark. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 10–27.
2.
ApJ.CromptonJ. L. (1998). Developing and testing a tourism impact scale. Journal of Travel Research, 37(2), 120–130.
3.
BatemanT. S.CrantJ. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118.
4.
BozemanB.SuX. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710.
5.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413–440.
6.
BrightL. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.
7.
CampbellJ. W.ImT.JeongJ. (2014). Internal efficiency and turnover intention: Evidence from local government in South Korea. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 259–282.
Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. (2019-12). Different levels of government have taken effective measures to reduce the burden and stimulate taking charge behavior of civil servants (in Chinese). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-12/10/content_5460114.htm
10.
ChenC. A.BozemanB. (2013). Understanding public and nonprofit managers’ motivation through the lens of self-determination theory. Public Management Review, 15(4), 584–607.
11.
ChenJ.WangL.TangN. (2016). Half the sky: The moderating role of cultural collectivism in job turnover among Chinese female workers. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 487–498.
12.
ChungP. K.LiuJ. D. (2012). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Chinese translated behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire-2. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 16(4), 300–315.
13.
De CoomanR.De GieterS.PepermansR.HermansS.Du BoisC.CaersR.JegersM. (2009). Person–organization fit: Testing socialization and attraction–selection–attrition hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 102–107.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185.
17.
DeHart-DavisL.MarloweJ.PandeyS. K. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873–887.
18.
DenmanD. C.BaldwinA. S.MarksE. G.LeeS. C.TiroJ. A. (2016). Modification and validation of the treatment self-regulation questionnaire to assess parental motivation for HPV vaccination of adolescents. Vaccine, 34(41), 4985–4990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.037
19.
EdmundsJ.NtoumanisN.DudaJ. L. (2006). A test of self-determination theory in the exercise domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(9), 2240–2265.
20.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
21.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.Van den BroeckA.AspeliA. K.BelleroseJ.BenabouC.ChemolliE.GüntertS. T.HalvariH.IndiyastutiD. L.JohnsonP. A.MolstadM. H.NaudinM.NdaoA.OlafsenA. H.RousselP.WangZ.WestbyeC. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196.
22.
GoertzG. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: International version. Pearson.
25.
HanischK. A.HulinC. L. (1991). General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(1), 110–128.
26.
HayamizuT. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39(2), 98–108.
27.
HomP. W.KinickiA. J. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 975–987.
28.
HombergF.VogelR.WeiherlJ. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1), 28–47.
29.
HoustonD. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–728.
30.
HsiehJ. Y. (2019). The shape of public governance in Taiwan: Penetrating the boundary between public management and public policy. Chinese Public Administration Review, 10(1), 7–11.
31.
HuangW. L. (2019). The impact of extrinsic rewards and public service motivation on public employees’ work performance: Does seniority matter?. Chinese Public Administration Review, 10(1), 12–27.
32.
HuiC. H.YeeC.EastmanK. L. (1995). The relationship between individualism—collectivism and job satisfaction. Applied Psychology, 44(3), 276–282.
33.
IngledewD. K.MarklandD. (2008). The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychology and Health, 23(7), 807–828.
34.
KimS. (2009). Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149–163.
35.
KimS.VandenabeeleW. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709.
36.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB.AndersenL.CeraseF.ChristensenR.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP. L. M.LiuB. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
37.
KimT. Y.LiuZ. (2017). Taking charge and employee outcomes: The moderating effect of emotional competence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 775–793.
38.
KimT. Y.LiuZ.DiefendorffJ. M. (2015). Leader–member exchange and job performance: The effects of taking charge and organizational tenure. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 216–231.
39.
KoslowskyM. (2000). A new perspective on employee lateness. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 390–407.
40.
LehmanW. E.SimpsonD. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 309–321.
41.
LeisinkP.SteijnB. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35–52.
42.
LevesqueC. S.WilliamsG. C.ElliotD.PickeringM. A.BodenhamerB.FinleyP. J. (2007). Validating the theoretical structure of the treatment self-regulation questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Education Research, 22(5), 691–702.
43.
LiuB.TangN.ZhuX. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29, 684–699.
44.
LiuH. T.ChenD. Y. (2021). The effect of public servants’ reinvention reform perception on organizational performance in Taiwan: The mediating roles of public service motivation and organizational commitment. Chinese Public Administration Review, 12(1), 35–50.
45.
MarklandD.TobinV. (2004). A modification to the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(2), 191–196.
46.
MorrisonE. W.PhelpsC. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419.
47.
NoelsK. A.PelletierL. G.ClémentR.VallerandR. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85.
48.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2d ed.). McGraw-Hill.
49.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.
50.
PandeyS. J.StazykE. C. (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 101–117). Oxford University Press.
51.
ParkM.LeeB. H. (2023). Do public service motivation and organizational processes influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment? A comparative study in public and private organizations. Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(4), 224–237.
52.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BriereN. M.BlaisM. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53.
53.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
54.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181–197.
55.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press on Demand.
56.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.
57.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
58.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The Collapse and Revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
59.
QuratulainS.KhanA. K. (2015). Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: Testing a model of moderated mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(4), 307–332.
60.
RitzA. (2011). Attraction to public policy-making: A qualitative inquiry into improvements in PSM measurement. Public Administration, 89(3), 1128–1147.
61.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
62.
RyanR. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.
63.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749.
64.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
65.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
66.
ShimD. C.ParkH. H.EomT. H. (2017). Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: Does public service motivation matter?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 563–582.
67.
SinghT.ChettyN.KarodiaA. M. (2016). An investigation into the impact of absenteeism on the organisational performance of a private security company in Durban, Kwazulu-Natal. Singaporean Journal of Business, Economics and Management Studies, 51(3415), 1–55.
68.
StillmanR. J. (1996). Key decision makers inside public administration: The concept of competing bureaucratic subsystems. In StillmanR. J. (Ed.), Public administration: Concepts and cases (pp. 171–194). Cengage Learning.
69.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S.UllmanJ. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
70.
TangR. (2018). Five requirements for civil servants embody taking charge spirits of a new era (in Chinese). People’s Tribune, 8, 10–14.
71.
ThantZ. M. (2023). Assessing the determinants of Myanmar government employees’ job satisfaction through Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(1), 27–38.
72.
VandenabeeleW. (2011). Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer?. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 87–107.
73.
WilsonP. M.RodgersW. M.LoitzC. C.ScimeG. (2006). “It’s who I am . . . really!’ The importance of integrated regulation in exercise contexts. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 11(2), 79–104.
74.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K.IsettK. R. (2013). Motivated to adapt? The role of public service motivation as employees face organizational change. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 738–747.
75.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215.
76.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person—Organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521.
77.
XuC.ChenC. A. (2016). Moving from public service motivation (PSM) to motivation for public service (MPS): Through the lens of self-determination theory. In WadeS. L. (Ed.), Self-determination theory (SDT): Perspective, applications and impact (pp. 1–8). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
