Research has shown that nonprofits led by people of color (POC) tend to have more diverse staff compared to White-led organizations, yet it remains unclear whether leaders of color inherently attract racially diverse talent. Using an online experiment, this study investigates the impact of the racial/ethnic composition of nonprofit leadership on job-seeking behaviors. While participants consistently view POC-led nonprofits as more committed to diversity, this positive perception does not influence their job choices. When given a choice, White individuals tend to prefer working for White-led nonprofits, whereas people of color show no strong preference between POC-led and White-led nonprofits. The results shed light on the complexities of racial representation in talent acquisition, offering important insights into the broader discourse on nonprofit diversity and the persistent barriers POC-led organizations face in achieving diverse staffing.
AguinisH.VillamorI.RamaniR. S. (2021). MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 47(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969787
2.
AldagR.SchwabD. P.RynesS. L. (1987). Theories and research on job search and choice. In RowlandK. M.FerrisG. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 120–166). JAI Press. http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.1.1004.4323
3.
AmisJ. M.MairJ.MunirK. A. (2020). The organizational reproduction of inequality. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 195–230. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0033
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
5.
AveryD. R. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising: Are differences black and white?The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672
6.
AveryD. R.HernandezM.HeblM. R. (2004). Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02541.x
7.
BarnardC. I. (1971). The functions of the executive: Thirtieth anniversary edition (30th ed.). Harvard University Press.
8.
BerghC.HooblerJ. M. (2022). Why and when is implicit racial bias linked to abusive supervision? The impact of manager racial microaggressions and individualized consideration. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03292-8
9.
BescoR. (2015). Rainbow coalitions or inter-minority conflict? Racial affinity and diverse minority voters. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 48(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423915000396
10.
BlauP. (1986). Exchange and power in social life (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Branch Associates. (2016). How African American-led organizations differ from White-led organizations: Research report on African American nonprofit organizations in Philadelphia (p. 55).
13.
BrownW. A. (2002). Racial diversity and performance of nonprofit boards of directors. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 7, 45–57.
CarrollK. (2017). Ambition is priceless: Socialization, ambition, and representative bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016671602
16.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
17.
ChapmanD. S.UggerslevK. L.CarrollS. A.PiasentinK. A.JonesD. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
18.
ChengY. (Daniel)YangL. (Kate)DengS. (2022). Nonprofit density and distributional equity in public service provision: Exploring racial/ethnic disparities in public park access across U.S. cities. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13465
19.
CheungJ. H.BurnsD. K.SinclairR. R.SliterM. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5
20.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2010). Managing diversity in U.S. federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x
21.
CliffordS.JewellR. M.WaggonerP. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?Research & Politics, 2(4), 2053168015622072. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072
22.
CoxT. H. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research & practice. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
23.
DasslerA.KhapovaS. N.LysovaE. I.KorotovK. (2022). Employer attractiveness from an employee perspective: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 858217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858217
24.
de GraauwE. (2016). Making immigrant rights real: Nonprofits and the politics of integration in San Francisco (1st ed.). Cornell University Press.
25.
De VitaC. J.RoegerK. L.NiedzwieckiM. (2009). Measuring racial-ethnic diversity in California’s nonprofit sector [Dataset]. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e726462011-001
26.
DeCosterJ.GallucciM.IselinA.-M. R. (2011). Best practices for using median splits, artificial categorization, and their continuous alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.008310
27.
DeslatteA. (2020). Positivity and negativity dominance in citizen assessments of intergovernmental sustainability performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30, 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa004
DustS. B.ResickC. J.MargolisJ. A.MawritzM. B.GreenbaumR. L. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee success: Examining the roles of psychological empowerment and emotional exhaustion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.02.002
31.
ElyR. J.ThomasD. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087
EvertzL.SüßS. (2017). The importance of individual differences for applicant attraction: A literature review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 67(3), 141–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0126-2
FaulkL.PandeyS.PandeyS. K.KennedyK. S. (2020). Donors’ responses to profit incentives in the social sector: The entrepreneurial orientation reward and the profit penalty. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(1), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22179
FjendboT. H. (2021). Leading employees of different genders: The importance of gender for the leadership-motivation relationship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(4), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20925520
38.
FoldyE. G.BuckleyT. R. (2014). The color bind: Talking (and not talking) about race at work. Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
FredetteC.Sessler BernsteinR. (2019). Ethno-racial diversity on nonprofit boards: A critical mass perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019839778
40.
FredetteC.Sessler BernsteinR. (2021). Governance effectiveness: The interaction of ethno-racial diversity and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(4), 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020977698
41.
FultonB. R. (2020). Bridging and bonding: Disentangling two mechanisms underlying the diversity–performance relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,50(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020939654
42.
FultonB. R.OyakawaM.WoodR. L. (2019). Critical standpoint: Leaders of color advancing racial equality in predominantly white organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21387
43.
GalesicM.BosnjakM. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031
GiulianoL.LevineD. I.LeonardJ. (2006, July1). Do race, age, and gender differences affect manager-employee relations? An analysis of quits, dismissals, and promotions at a large retail firm. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tc8n5j7
47.
González-RiveraC.DonnellC.BrionesA.WerblinS. (2008). Funding the new majority: Philanthropic investment in minority-led nonprofits (p. 16). The Greenlining Institute.
48.
GoodenS. T.EvansL. L.PerkinsM. L.GoodenC.PangY. (2018). Examining youth outcomes of African American–led nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 34S–54S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018757028
HandyF.KatzE. (1998). The wage differential between nonprofit institutions and corporations: Getting more by paying less?Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1998.1520
51.
HansmannH. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901. https://doi.org/10.2307/796089
52.
HauserD. J.SchwarzN. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
53.
HeadleyA. M.WrightJ. E.MeierK. J. (2021). Bureaucracy, democracy, and race: The limits of symbolic representation. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13358
54.
HecklerN. (2019). Whiteness and masculinity in nonprofit organizations: Law, money, and institutional race and gender. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(3), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1621659
55.
HermanR. D. (2016). Executive leadership. In RenzD. O.HermanR. D. (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 167–187). John Wiley & Sons.
56.
HermanR. D.HeimovicsR. D. (1990). The effective nonprofit executive: Leader of the board. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130010207
57.
HerringC. (2009). Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400203
58.
HerzogA. R.BachmanJ. G. (1981). Effects of questionnaire length on response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(4), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1086/268687
59.
HolleyL. C. (2003). Emerging ethnic agencies: Building capacity to build community. Journal of Community Practice, 11(4), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v11n04_03
60.
HolmesT. P.AdamowiczW. L.CarlssonF. (2017). Choice experiments. In ChampP. A.BoyleK. J.BrownT. C. (Eds.), A primer on nonmarket valuation (Vol. 13, pp. 133–186). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_5
61.
HuangT.VilladsenA. R. (2023). Top managers in public organizations: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1618–1634. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13628
JamesO.JilkeS. R.Van RyzinG. G. (Eds.). (2017). Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912
64.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status Quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
65.
JurcevicI.FyallR. (2020). Does a business-like approach to diversity in nonprofit organizations have a chilling effect on stakeholders?Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.100
KimM.LiB. (2023). Financial challenges of nonprofits serving people of color: Original survey results. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1145–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221122812
68.
KimM.MasonD. P. (2018). Representation and diversity, advocacy, and nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017728364
69.
KunreutherF.Thomas-BreitfeldS. (2020). Race to lead revised: Obstacles and opportunities in addressing the nonprofit racial leadership gap. Building Movement Project.
70.
LancsarE.FiebigD. G.HoleA. R. (2017). Discrete choice experiments: A guide to model specification, estimation and software. PharmacoEconomics, 35(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4
71.
LancsarE.LouviereJ. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user’s guide. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004
72.
LeardiniC.RossiG.MoggiS.ZardiniA. (2017). When the law shapes nonprofit boards: The key role of local stakeholders. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016634891
73.
LeeC. A.WongK.PfeifferD. (2017). On the front lines of immigrant homeownership: Asian American nonprofits during the great recession. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(6), 1209–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017713726
74.
LeeD.ZhangY. (2021). The value of public organizations’ diversity reputation in women’s and minorities’ job choice decisions. Public Management Review, 23(10), 1436–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751253
75.
LeeY.-J. (2021). Nonprofit arts organizations’ pursuit of public interests: The role of board diversity. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 12(4), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2020-0036
76.
LeeteL. (2006). Work in the nonprofit sector. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300153439-010
77.
LeRouxK. (2009). The effects of descriptive representation on nonprofits’ civic intermediary roles: A test of the “racial mismatch” hypothesis in the social services sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008318710
78.
LeRouxK. (2020). Racial diversity and organizational performance in the U.S. nonprofit sector. In RutherfordA.MeierK. (Eds.), Race and public administration (pp. 119–139). Routledge.
79.
LeRouxK.FeeneyM. K. (2013). Factors attracting individuals to nonprofit management over public and private sector management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21079
80.
LeRouxK. M.SneedB. G. (2006). The convergence of public and nonprofit values: A research agenda for the intersectoral study of representative bureaucracy. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 9(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-09-04-2006-B004
81.
LeRouxK.MedinaA. (2023). Bending the arc of nonprofit leadership toward justice: Impacts of racial representation and organizational publicness on diversifying executive leadership. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13534
82.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
83.
McFaddenD. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembkaP. (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
84.
McKayP. F.AveryD. R. (2006). What has race got to do with it? Unraveling the role of racioethnicity in job seekers’ reactions to site visits. Personnel Psychology, 59(2), 395–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00079.x
85.
MosherF. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
PérezE.VicuñaB.RamosA. (2024a). Shared status, shared politics? Evaluating a new pathway to Black solidarity with other people of color. Political Behavior, 46(2), 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09863-0
91.
PérezE.VicuñaB.RamosA. (2024b). Taking stock of solidarity between people of color: A mini meta-analysis of five experiments. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001120
92.
PerryJ.HondeghemA. (2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887673
93.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
94.
PitkinH. F. (1972). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
95.
PittsD. W. (2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui033
96.
QuillianL.PagerD.HexelO.MidtbøenA. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(41), 10870–10875. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706255114
97.
RauB. L.HylandM. A. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.x
98.
ReskinB. F. (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology, 29(2), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654387
99.
RiccucciN. M.Van RyzinG. G.JacksonK. (2018). Representative bureaucracy, race, and policing: A survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy023
100.
RiccucciN. M.Van RyzinG. G.LiH. (2016). Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: An experimental study. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12401
101.
SchwartzR.WeinbergJ.HagenbuchD.ScottA. (2011). The voice of nonprofit talent: Perceptions of diversity in the workplace. Commongood Careers and Level Playing Field Institute.
102.
SchwarzG.EvaN.NewmanA. (2020). Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182
103.
Sessler BernsteinR.BilimoriaD. (2013). Diversity perspectives and minority nonprofit board member inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32(7), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2012-0010
104.
Sessler BernsteinR.FredetteC. (2024). Decomposing the impact of leadership diversity among nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53, 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221145119
105.
SmithC. R.FernandezS. (2010). Equity in federal contracting: Examining the link between minority representation and federal procurement decisions. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 87–96.
106.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1995). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.
StraderE.GriffieV.IrelanP. C.KwanL. Y.NorthcottE.PandeyS. K. (2023). Race in representative bureaucracy theory: A problematizing review. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1687–1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13640
109.
StreetD. J.BunchD. S.MooreB. J. (2001). Optimal designs for 2 k paired comparison experiments. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 30(10), 2149–2171. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-100106068
110.
StreetD. J.BurgessL.LouviereJ. J. (2005). Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003
111.
StreinerD. L. (2002). Breaking up is hard to do: The heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370204700307
112.
StritchJ. M.PedersenM. J.TaggartG. (2017). The opportunities and limitations of using Mechanical Turk (MTURK) in public administration and management scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1276493
113.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In JostJ. T.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
114.
Thomas-BreitfeldS.KunreutherF. (2017). Race to lead: Confronting the nonprofit racial leadership gap. Building Movement Project.
UggerslevK. L.FassinaN. E.KraichyD. (2012). Recruiting through the stages: A meta-analytic test of predictors of applicant attraction at different stages of the recruiting process. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 597–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01254.x
VuC. M.NguyenD.TanhD. B.ChunJ. (2017). Case study of an ethnic community-based organization in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016654220
120.
WalkerH. J.FeildH. S.BernerthJ. B.BectonJ. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers’ information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025847
121.
WenzelA.-K.KrauseT. A.VogelD. (2019). Making performance pay work: The impact of transparency, participation, and fairness on controlling perception and intrinsic motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17715502
122.
WordJ.CarpenterH. (2013). The new public service? Applying the public service motivation model to nonprofit employees. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013495773
123.
WordJ.ParkS. M. (2015). The new public service? Empirical research on job choice motivation in the nonprofit sector. Personnel Review, 44(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2012-0120
124.
ZhangZ.GuoC. (2021). No advocacy without representation? Nonprofit representational mix and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 32(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21479
