Employer Value Propositions for Different Target Groups and Organizational Types in the Public Sector: Theory and Evidence From Field Experiments

Abstract

Public employers struggle with recruiting talents and labor market competition. Research on the understudied topic of employer branding can help address this challenge. This study presents five large-scale, pre-registered field experiments (n = 155,634) aimed at increasing the number of individuals initially interested in a job at a public employer. In social media ads, public sector values served as signaled employer value propositions (EVPs). The results show the importance of target groups and points of difference related to public employers’ organizational type. Significantly fewer women show interest in a job, and for a municipal administration, a fair pay EVP has a negative effect. This study enhances the understanding of potential recruits’ environment- and self-processing, bridges EVPs with public values theory, and provides a missing theoretical link between publicness and recruitment. It shows the importance of testing common assumptions about what works in recruitment in field studies with high external validity.

Keywords

employer value propositions public values theory publicness recruitment social media field experiments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguinis

Jensen

S. H.

Kraus

(2021). Policy implications of organizational behavior and human resource management research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(3), 857–878. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0093

Alon-Barkat

(2020). Can government public communications elicit undue trust? Exploring the interaction between symbols and substantive information in communications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz013

Alter

A. L.

Aronson

Darley

J. M.

Rodriguez

Ruble

D. N.

(2010). Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.014

Andersen

L. B.

Jørgensen

T. B.

Kjeldsen

A. M.

Pedersen

L. H.

Vrangbæk

(2013). Public values and public service motivation: Conceptual and empirical relationships. American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012440031

Andersen

L. B.

Pedersen

L. H.

Petersen

O. H.

(2018). Motivational foundations of public service provision: Towards a theoretical synthesis. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy003

Andrews

Ferry

Skelcher

Wegorowski

(2020). Corporatization in the public sector: Explaining the growth of local government companies. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13052

Antonsen

Jørgensen

T. B.

(1997). The ‘publicness’ of public organizations. Public Administration, 75(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00064

Aral

(2016). Networked experiments. In Bramoullé

Galeotti

Rogers

B. W.

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of the economics of networks (pp. 376–411). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199948277.013.2

Ashraf

Bandiera

Davenport

Lee

S. S.

(2020). Losing prosociality in the quest for talent? Sorting, selection, and productivity in the delivery of public services. American Economic Review, 110 (5), 1355–1394. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180326

10.

Asseburg

Hattke

Hensel

Homberg

Vogel

(2020). The tacit dimension of public sector attraction in multi-incentive settings. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz004

11.

Auspurg

Hinz

Sauer

(2017). Why should women get less? Evidence on the gender pay gap from multifactorial survey experiments. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416683393

12.

Baum

Kabst

(2014). The effectiveness of recruitment advertisements and recruitment websites: Indirect and interactive effects on applicant attraction. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21571

13.

Belk

R. W.

(2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052

14.

Blom

Kruyen

P. M.

Van der Heijden

B. I. J. M.

Van Thiel

(2020). One HRM fits all? A meta-analysis of the effects of HRM practices in the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18773492

15.

Bond

R. M.

Fariss

C. J.

Jones

J. J.

Kramer

A. D. I.

Marlow

Settle

J. E.

Fowler

J. H.

(2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421

16.

Bozeman

Moulton

(2011). Integrative publicness: A framework for public management strategy and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 3), i363–i380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur031

17.

Bromberg

D. E.

Charbonneau

. (2020). Public service motivation, personality, and the hiring decisions of public managers: An experimental study. Public Personnel Management, 49(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019855749

18.

Bruton

G. D.

Peng

M. W.

Ahlstrom

Stan

(2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0069

19.

Byrnes

J. P.

Miller

D. C.

Schafer

W. D.

(1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

20.

Carless

S. A.

(2005). Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25995

21.

Carpentier

Van Hoye

Weijters

(2019). Attracting applicants through the organization’s social media page: Signaling employer brand personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103326

22.

Celani

Singh

(2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111106093

23.

Chatman

J. A.

(1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393204

24.

Chetkovich

(2003). What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00330

25.

Cinelli

Forney

Pearl

(2020). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099552

26.

Collins

C. J.

Han

(2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 685–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00004.x

27.

Connelly

B. L.

Certo

S. T.

Ireland

R. D.

Reutzel

C. R.

(2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

28.

Cordes

Vogel

(2022). Comparing employer attractiveness of public sector organizations to nonprofit and private sector organizations: An experimental study in Germany and the U.S. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211065349

29.

Crucke

Kluijtmans

Meyfroodt

Desmidt

(2021). How does organizational sustainability foster public service motivation and job satisfaction? The mediating role of organizational support and societal impact potential. Public Management Review, 24(8), 1155–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893801

30.

Dal Bó

Finan

Rossi

M. A

. (2013). Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1169–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt008

31.

Dawson

(2017). The upside of pessimism − Biased beliefs and the paradox of the contented female worker. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 135, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.004

32.

Eagly

A. H.

Chaiken

(1984). Cognitive theories of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 267–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60122-7

33.

Ehrhart

K. H.

Ziegert

J. C.

(2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations? Journal of Management, 31(6), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279759

34.

Ellis

D. A.

(2020). Smartphones within psychological science (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671408

35.

Eriksson

Andersson

Hellström

Gadolin

Lifvergren

(2020). Collaborative public management: Coordinated value propositions among public service organizations. Public Management Review, 22(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604793

36.

Eshuis

Geest

Klijn

E. H.

Voets

Florek

George

(2021). The effect of the EU-brand on citizens’ trust in policies: Replicating an experiment. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13367

37.

Fay

D. L.

Zavattaro

S. M.

(2016). Branding and isomorphism: The case of higher education. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12626

38.

Feldman

D. C.

Bearden

W. O.

Hardesty

D. M.

(2006). Varying the content of job advertisements: The effects of message specificity. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350108

39.

Festing

Knappert

Kornau

(2015). Gender-specific preferences in global performance management: An empirical study of male and female managers in a multinational context. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21609

40.

Fowler

Birdsall

(2020). Are the best and brightest joining the public service? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 532–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19836152

41.

Fukumoto

Bozeman

(2019). Public values theory: What is missing? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018814244

42.

Gaucher

Friesen

Kay

A. C.

(2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530

43.

Gerber

A. S.

Green

D. P.

(2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. Norton.

44.

Götz

F. M.

Stieger

Reips

U.-D.

(2017). Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, android) differ only little in personality. PLoS One, 12(5), e0176921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176921

45.

Grant

A. M.

(2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48

46.

Greening

D. W.

Turban

D. B.

(2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302

47.

Grossi

Papenfuß

Tremblay

M.-S.

(2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2015-0166

48.

Hansen

J. A.

Tummers

(2020). A systematic review of field experiments in public administration. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13181

49.

Hentschel

Braun

Peus

Frey

(2021). Sounds like a fit! Wording in recruitment advertisements and recruiter gender affect women’s pursuit of career development programs via anticipated belongingness. Human Resource Management, 60(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22043

50.

Holm

(1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.

51.

James

John

Moseley

(2017). Field experiments in public management research. In James

Jilke

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(Eds.), Experiments in public management research: challenges and contributions (pp. 89–116). Cambridge University Press.

52.

Jankowski

Prokop

Tepe

(2020). Representative bureaucracy and public hiring preferences: Evidence from a conjoint experiment among German municipal civil servants and private sector employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa012

53.

Jensen

U. T.

Helby Petersen

Jacobsen

C. B.

Jessen Hansen

J. A.

Maroulis

(2022). Co-producing field experiments in public management research: A guide to enhanced research–practice collaboration. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2083848

54.

Jilke

Shinohara

(2019). Using large-scale social media experiments in public administration: Assessing charitable consequences of government funding of nonprofits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy021

55.

Jones

D. A.

Willness

C. R.

Madey

(2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0848

56.

Jørgensen

T. B.

Bozeman

(2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703

57.

Keppeler

Papenfuß

(2021). Employer branding and recruitment: Social media field experiments targeting future public employees. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13324

58.

Kjeldsen

A. M.

Jacobsen

C. B.

(2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: attraction or socialization? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus039

59.

Korac

Lindenmeier

Saliterer

(2020). Attractiveness of public sector employment at the pre-entry level – a hierarchical model approach and analysis of gender effects. Public Management Review, 22(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1582688

60.

Korac

Saliterer

Weigand

(2019). Factors affecting the preference for public sector employment at the pre-entry level: A systematic review. International Public Management Journal, 22(5), 797–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1430086

61.

Kougiannou

N. K.

Ridgway

(2022). How is human resource management research (not) helping practice? In defence of practical implications. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(2), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12414

62.

Lazear

E. P.

Oyer

(2012). Personnel economics. In Gibbons

Roberts

(Eds.), The handbook of organizational economics (pp. 479–519). Princeton University Press.

63.

Lievens

Highhouse

(2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x

64.

Lievens

Slaughter

J. E.

(2016). Employer image and employer branding: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 407–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062501

65.

Linos

(2018). More than public service: A field experiment on job advertisements and diversity in the police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux032

66.

Linos

Riesch

(2020). Thick red tape and the thin blue line: A field study on reducing administrative burden in police recruitment. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13115

67.

Luan

Reb

Gigerenzer

(2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735–1759. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172

68.

Mahjoub

Kruyen

P. M.

(2021). Efficient recruitment with effective job advertisement: An exploratory literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 24(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-04-2020-0052

69.

Major

Forcey

(1985). Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90038-1

70.

Mauno

Kinnunen

Ruokolainen

(2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002

71.

Mutz

D. C.

(2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton University Press.

72.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Are generational categories meaningful distinctions for workforce management? National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25796

73.

OECD. (2015). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. OECD Publishing.

74.

OECD. (2016). Engaging public employees for a high-performing civil service. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267190-en

75.

OECD. (2017). The size and sectoral distribution of state-owned enterprises. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264280663-en

76.

OECD. (2019). Government at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8ccf5c38-en

77.

Papenfuß

Keppeler

(2020). Does performance-related pay and public service motivation research treat state-owned enterprises like a neglected Cinderella? A systematic literature review and agenda for future research on performance effects. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1740300

78.

Papenfuß

Schmidt

C. A.

(2021). Understanding self-regulation for political control and policymaking: Effects of governance mechanisms on accountability. Governance, 34(4), 1115–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12549

79.

Piatak

J. S.

Sowa

J. E.

Jacobson

W. S.

McGinnis Johnson

(2020). Infusing Public Service Motivation (PSM) throughout the employment relationship: A review of PSM and the human resource management process. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1805381

80.

Rainey

H. G.

(1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration & Society, 15(2), 207–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978301500203

81.

Riccucci

N. M.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2016). Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: An experimental study. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12401

82.

Ritz

Weißmüller

K. S.

Meynhardt

(2022). Public value at cross points: A comparative study on employer attractiveness of public, private, and nonprofit organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221098153

83.

Rudolph

C. W.

Zacher

(2016). Considering generations from a lifespan developmental perspective. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw019

84.

Ryan

T. J.

(2012). What makes us click? Demonstrating incentives for angry discourse with digital-age field experiments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000540

85.

Rynes

S. L.

Bretz

R. D.

Gerhart

(1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44(3), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb02402.x

86.

Schwoerer

Keppeler

Mussagulova

Puello

(2022). CO-DESIGN-ing a more context-based, pluralistic, and participatory future for public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12828

87.

Sievert

Vogel

Feeney

M. K.

(2022). Formalization and administrative burden as obstacles to employee recruitment: Consequences for the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20932997

88.

Simon

H. A.

(1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.

89.

Sivertzen

A.-M.

Nilsen

E. R.

Olafsen

A. H.

(2013). Employer branding: Employer attractiveness and the use of social media. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(7), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2013-0393

90.

Spence

(1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

91.

Sweeney

P. D.

McFarlin

D. B.

(1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 83–98.

92.

Tajfel

(1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. Differentiation between social groups. Academic Press.

93.

Tavares

G. M.

Sobral

Wright

B. E.

(2021). Commitment to public values, charismatic leadership attributions, and employee turnover in street-level bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 542–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa057

94.

Teodoro

M. P.

S.-H.

(2018). Citizen-based brand equity: A model and experimental evaluation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux044

95.

Theurer

C. P.

Tumasjan

Welpe

I. M.

Lievens

(2018). Employer branding: A brand equity-based literature review and research agenda: Brand equity-based employer branding. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12121

96.

van den Bekerom

van der Voet

Christensen

. (2021). Are citizens more negative about failing service delivery by public than private organizations? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa027

97.

Van de Walle

Steijn

Jilke

(2015). Extrinsic motivation, PSM and labour market characteristics: A multilevel model of public sector employment preference in 26 countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314563899

98.

Van Thiel

. (2012). Comparing agencies across countries. In Verhoest

Van Thiel

Bouckaert

Lægreid

(Eds.), Government agencies. Practices and lessons from 30 countries (pp. 18–26). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359512

99.

Vogel

Homberg

(2021). P-hacking, P-curves, and the PSM–performance relationship: Is there evidential value? Public Administration Review, 81(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13273

100.

Vogel

Willems

(2020). The effects of making public service employees aware of their prosocial and societal impact: A microintervention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz044

101.

Weske

Ritz

Schott

Neumann

(2020). Attracting future civil servants with public values? An experimental study on employer branding. International Public Management Journal, 23(5), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1541830

102.

Wilden

Gudergan

Lings

(2010). Employer branding: Strategic implications for staff recruitment. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(1–2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903577091

103.

Wille

Derous

Weijters

(2020). Differentiation is key: Should employers offer something unique or the same yet better? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(5), 753–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1750472

104.

Williamson

Colley

Foley

(2020). Human resource devolution, decoupling and incoherence: How line managers manage gender equality reforms. Public Management Review, 22(10), 1560–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1642951

105.

Zhang

Mao

(2016). From online motivations to ad clicks and to behavioral intentions: An empirical study of consumer response to social media advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 33(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20862

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.35 MB