Leadership Matters,But So Do Co-Workers: A Study of the Relative Importance of Transformational Leadership and Team Relations for Employee Outcomes and User Satisfaction
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2022
Leadership Matters,But So Do Co-Workers: A Study of the Relative Importance of Transformational Leadership and Team Relations for Employee Outcomes and User Satisfaction
In recent decades, public administration has taken a great interest in leadership. However, this interest has been met with concerns that the effects of leadership are overestimated compared to other relevant organizational factors. In this article, we explore the relative importance of formal, vertical leadership, specifically transformational leadership, and horizontal relations, that is, the internal team relations, for different employee outcomes and user satisfaction. We argue that both factors may work through public service motivation (PSM). Based on survey data collected in Danish nursing homes linked with a user satisfaction survey and employee sickness absence data, we find that the internal team relations have the strongest association with some outcome measures, whereas others are more substantially related to vertical leadership. We further find that the relationship between transformational leadership and these outcome measures is fully mediated by PSM, whereas this is not the case with the internal team relations.
AmirkhanyanA. A.KimH. J.LambrightK. T. (2014). The performance puzzle: Understanding the factors influencing alternative dimensions and views of performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 1–34.
2.
Anderfuhren-BigetS.VaroneF.GiauqueD.RitzA. (2010). Motivating employees of the public sector: Does public service motivation matter?International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 213–246.
3.
AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.BroL. L.Holm-PetersenC. (2018). Achieving high quality through transformational leadership: A qualitative multilevel analysis of transformational leadership and perceived professional quality. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 51–72.
4.
AndersenL. B.BoesenA.PedersenL. H. (2016). Performance in public organizations: Clarifying the conceptual space. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 852–862.
5.
AndersenL. B.HeinesenE.PedersenL. H. (2014). How does public service motivation among teachers affect student performance in schools?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 651–671.
6.
AndersenL. B.KjeldsenA. M. (2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector?International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 252–274.
7.
AndersenL. B.PallesenT.Holm PedersenL. (2011). Does ownership matter? Public service motivation among physiotherapists in the private and public sectors in Denmark. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 10–27.
8.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
9.
AwanS.BelG.EsteveM. (2020). The benefits of PSM: An oasis or a mirage?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 619–635.
10.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press.
11.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.JungD. I.BersonY. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218.
12.
BassB. M.RiggoR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
BehnR. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
14.
BelléN. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153.
15.
BelléN. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109–136.
BraunS.PeusC.WeisweilerS.FreyD. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270–283.
18.
BrewerG. A.Jr. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on federal agencies. In BoyneG. A.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.WalkerR. M. (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 35–54). Cambridge University Press.
19.
BrightL. (2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361–379.
20.
BrightL. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.
21.
BuelensM.Van Den BroeckH. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65–74.
22.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row.
23.
CarsonJ. B.TeslukP. E.MarroneJ. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.
24.
ChenG.KanferR. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267.
25.
ChenG.KirkmanB. L.KanferR.AllenD.RosenB. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331–346.
26.
ChenG.SharmaP. N.EdingerS. K.ShapiroD. L.FarhJ.-L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541–557.
27.
ContiB.KleinerB. H. (1997). How to increase teamwork in organizations. Training for Quality, 5, 26–29.
28.
CourseyD. H.PandeyS. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547–568.
29.
CsonkaA.BollJ. L. (2000). Home care in Denmark (The Open Labour Market, Working Paper 12:2000). The Danish National Institute of Social Research.
30.
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.
31.
DinhJ. E.LordR. G.GardnerW. G.MeuserdJ. D.LidendR. C.HuJ. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.
32.
FaveroN.BullockJ. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308.
33.
FimianM. J.FastenauP. S.ThomasJ. A. (1988). Stress in nursing and intention of leaving the profession. Psychological Reports, 62(2), 499–506.
34.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—but where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.
35.
Gould-WilliamsJ. S.MostafaA. M. S.BottomleyP. (2015). Public service motivation and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector: Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 597–622.
36.
GroeneveldS.KuipersB. S. (2014). Teamwork in the public cage: Antecedents of self-management of teams in public organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 12064.
37.
Günzel-JensenF.JainA. K.KjeldsenA. M. (2018). Distributed leadership in health care: The role of formal leadership styles and organizational efficacy. Leadership, 14(1), 110–133.
38.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.
39.
HarrisA. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.
40.
HartleyJ. (2018). Ten propositions about public leadership. International Journal of Public Leadership, 14(4), 202–217.
41.
HaysR. D.HayashiT.StewartA. L. (1989). A five-item measure of socially desirable response set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 629–636.
42.
HoeglM.ParboteeahK. P. (2003). Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: On the moderating role of teamwork quality. Small Group Research, 34, 3–19.
43.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
44.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841.
45.
JakobsenM.JensenR. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30.
46.
JakobsenM. L.KjeldsenA. M.PallesenT. (2016). Distribueret ledelse i offentlige service organisationer. [Distributed leadership in public service organizations]. Politica, 48(2), 208–227.
47.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA. L.JacobsenC. B., et al. (2019a). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.
48.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019b). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24.
49.
KimS. (2012). Does person-organization fit matter in the public sector? Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830–840.
50.
KjeldsenA. M. (2012). Sector and occupational differences in public service motivation: A qualitative study. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 58–69.
51.
KozlowskiS. W. J.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.
LeeP.GillespieN.MannL.WearingA. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41(4), 473–491.
55.
LynggaardM.PedersenM. J.AndersenL. B. (2018). Exploring the context dependency of the PSM performance relationship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(3), 332–354.
56.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M.RichG. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115–134.
57.
MargettsH. Z. (2011). Experiments for public management research. Public Management Review, 13(2), 189–208.
58.
MaslowA. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harpers.
59.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2013). I think (I am doing well), therefore I am: Assessing the validity of administrators’ self-assessments of performance. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 1–27.
60.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K.WrightB. E. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 143–164.
61.
MutereraJ.HemsworthD.BareghehA.Garcia-RiveraB. R. (2015). The leader–follower dyad: The link between leader and follower perceptions of transformational leadership and its impact on job satisfaction and organizational performance. International Public Management Journal, 21(1), 131–162.
62.
NielsenP. A.MoynihanD. P. (2017). Romanticizing bureaucratic leadership? The politics of how elected officials attribute responsibility for performance. Governance, 30(4), 541–559.
63.
OraziD. C.TurriniA.ValottiG. (2013). Public sector leadership: New perspectives for research and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 486–504.
64.
O’Leary-KellyA. M.MartocchioJ. J.FrinkD. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301.
65.
PaarlbergL. E.LavignaB. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718.
66.
PaarlbergL. E.PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). From theory to practice: Strategies for applying public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 268–293). Oxford University Press.
67.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142.
68.
PearceC. L.SimsH. P.Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 6(2), 172–197.
69.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
70.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). Preface. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. vii–x). Oxford University Press.
71.
PerryJ. L.PorterL. W. (1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 89–98.
72.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
73.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 1(2), 107–142.
74.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569.
75.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.ScottB.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavorial research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
76.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
77.
RussoM. (2012). Diversity in goal orientation, team performance, and internal team environment. Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal, 31(2), 124–143.
78.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
79.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
80.
SalancikG.MeindlJ. (1984). Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2), 238–254.
81.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS. S. K.PengA. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863–871.
82.
SchlotterM.SchwerdtG.WoessmanL. (2011). Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: A non-technical guide. Education Economics, 19(2), 109–137.
83.
SchneiderB.BowenD. E. (1985). Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 423–433.
84.
ShamirB.HowellJ. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 257–283.
TummersL.KniesE. (2016). Measuring public leadership: Developing scales for four key public leadership roles. Public Administration, 94(2), 433–451.
87.
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556.
88.
VandenabeeleW. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11–34.
89.
VandenabeeleW. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153–173.
90.
VandenabeeleW.DepréR.HondeghemA.YanS. (2004). The motivational patterns of civil servants. Viesoji Politika Ir Administravimas, 13, 52–63.
91.
van der HoekM.GroeneveldS.KuipersB. (2016). Goal setting in teams: Goal clarity and team performance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 472–493.
92.
Van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
93.
Van LoonN. M.VandenabeeleW.LeisinkP. (2017). Clarifying the relationship between public service motivation and in-role and extra-role behaviors: The relative contributions of person-job and person-organization fit. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 699–713.
94.
Van WartM. (2013). Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553–565.
95.
VogelR.MasalD. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189.
96.
WagemanR.HackmanJ. R.LehmanE. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 373–398.
97.
WangG.I-sO.CourtrightS. H.ColbertA. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270.
98.
WilliamsL. J.VandenbergR. J.EdwardsJ. R. (2018). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604.
99.
WrightB. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54–64.
100.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215.
101.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 75–89.
102.
WuC.NeubertM. J.YiX. (2007). Transformational leadership, cohesion perceptions, and employee cynicism about organizational change: The mediating role of justice perceptions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 327–351.
103.
YuklG. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
