In the article, a model was developed to examine turnover intentions and was subsequently tested on state government employees. The findings from this model robustly indicated that quit intentions were lower among satisfied and high-performing employees. Contrary to what was expected, the results also demonstrated that public service motivation was positively associated with employee turnover intentions. On the other hand, participation in decision making, mission-contribution, and a fair reward system were not associated with employee leave intentions. The implications of these findings are thoroughly discussed in the article.
AbrahamKatherine G.MaitlandAaronBianchiSuzanne M. 2006. “Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who is Missing From the Data and How Much Does it Matter?”Public Opinion Quarterly70:676–703.
2.
AbramisDavid J. 1994. “Work Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance: Meta-Analyses and Review.”Psychological Reports75:1411–33.
3.
AlonsoPabloLewisGregory B.2001. “Public Service Motivation and Job Performance: Evidence From the Federal Sector.”American Review of Public Administration31:363–80.
4.
BertelliAnthony M. 2007. “Determinants of Bureaucratic Turnover Intention: Evidence From the Department of the Treasury.”Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory17:235–58.
5.
BrewerGene A.SeldenSally C .1998. “Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8:413–39.
6.
BrewerGene A.SeldenSally C. 2000. “Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies.”Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory10:685–711.
7.
BrightLeonard. 2007. “Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees?”Review of Public Personnel Administration27:361–79.
8.
BrightLeonard. 2008. “Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees?”The American Review of Public Administration38:149–66.
9.
BrownSarahGarinoGaiaMartinChristopher. 2009. “Firm Performance and Labour Turnover: Evidence From the 2004 Workplace Employee Relations Survey.”Economic Modelling26:689–95.
10.
CaillierJames G. 2010. “Factors Affecting Job Performance in Public Agencies.”Public Performance & Management Review34:139–65.
11.
DaleyDennis M. 2008. “The Burden of Dealing with Poor Performers: Wear and Tear on Supervisory Organizational Engagement.”Review of Public Personnel Administration28:44–59.
12.
DreherGeorge F. 1982. “The Role of Performance in the Turnover Process.”Academy of Management Journal25:137–47.
13.
GillJeffWatermanRichard W. 2004. “Solidary and Functional Costs: Explaining the Presidential Appointment Contradiction.”Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory14:547–69.
14.
Gould-WilliamsJulian. 2004. “The Effects of “High Commitment” HRM Practices on Employee Attitude: The Views of Public Sector Workers.”Public Administration82: 63–81.
HaarJarrod M.SpellChester S. 2009. “How Does Distributive Justice Affect Work Attitudes? The Moderating Effects of Autonomy.”International Journal of Human Resource Management20:1827–42.
17.
HackmanRichard J.OldhamGreg R. 1976. “Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance16:250–79.
18.
HirschmanAlbert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
IngersollRichard M. 2001. “Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis.”American Educational Research Journal38:499–534.
20.
JackofskyEllen F.PetersLawrence H.1983a. “The Hypothesized Effects of Ability in the Turnover Process.”Academy of Management Review8: 46–9.
21.
JackofskyEllen F.Lawrence HPeters. 1983b. “Job Turnover Versus Company Turnover: Reassessment of the March and Simon Participation Hypotheses.”Journal of Applied Psychology68:490–5.
22.
JacksonSusan E.SchulerRandall S. 1985. “A Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Critique of Research on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict in Work Settings.”Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes36:16–78.
23.
KemeryEdward R.Arthur GBedeianKevin WMossholderJTouliatos. 1985. “Outcomes of Role Stress: A Multisample Constructive Replication.”Academy of Management Journal28: 363–75.
24.
KimSoonhee. 2005. “Factors Affecting State Government Information Technology Employee Turnover Intentions.”The American Review of Public Administration35:137–56.
LanceCharles E. 1988. “Job Performance as a Moderator of the Satisfaction—Turnover Intention Relation: An Empirical Contrast of the Two Perspectives.”Journal of Organizational Behavior9: 271–80.
27.
LewisGregory B.1991. “Turnover and the Quiet Crisis in the Federal Civil Service.”Public Administration Review51: 145–55.
28.
LewisGregory B.ParkKim. 1989. “Turnover Rates in Federal White-Collar Employment: Are Women More Likely to Quit Than Men”American Review of Public Administration19:13–28.
29.
LockeEdwin A.LathamGary P. 2004. “What Should We Do About Motivation Theory? Six Recommendations for the Twenty-First Century.”Academy of Management Review29:388–403.
30.
MacLeodBentley W.MalcomsonJames M.1998. “Motivation and Markets.”American Economic Review88:388–411.
31.
MarchJames G.SimonHerbert A. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
MarksMitchell L.Phillip HMirvisEdward JHackettJames FGrady. 1986. “Employee Participation in a Quality Circle Program: Impact on Quality of Work Life, Productivity, and Absenteeism.”Journal of Applied Psychology71:61–9.
33.
MoynihanDonald P.LanduytNoel. 2008. “Explaining Turnover Intention in State Government: Examining the Roles of Gender, Life Cycle, and Loyalty.”Review of Public Personnel Administration28:120–43.
34.
NaffKatherine C.CrumJohn. 1999. “Working for America: Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference?”Review of Public Personnel Administration19:5–16.
35.
NgThomas W.ButtsMarcus M. 2009. “Effectiveness of Organizational Efforts to Lower Turnover Intentions: The Moderating Role of Employee Locus of Control.”Human Resource Management48:289–310.
36.
NorusisMarija J. 2005. SPSS 14.0: Statistical Procures Companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
OrpenChristopher. 1986. “The Effect of Job Performance on the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Turnover.”Journal of Social Psychology126:277–8.
38.
O’TooleJamesLawlerEdward E. 2006. The New American Workplace. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
ParkSung M.RaineyHal G. 2008. “Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies.”International Public Management Journal11:109–42.
40.
PerryJames L.WiseLois R. 1990. “The Motivational Bases of Public Service.”Public Administration Review50:367–73.
41.
RaineyHal G.SteinbauerPaula. 1999. “Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations.”Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory1:1–32.
42.
SchuttRussell K. 2006. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Sage.
43.
SeldenSally C.MoynihanDonald P. 2000. “A Model of Voluntary Turnover in State Government.”Review of Public Personnel Administration20:63–74.
44.
SiegfriedRobert L. 2008. “Mapping a Career Path for Attracting and Retaining Talent.”Financial Executive24:52–5.
45.
SpencerDaniel G.SteersRichard M. 1981. “Performance as a Moderator of the Job Satisfaction—Turnover Relationship.”Journal of Applied Psychology66:511–4.
46.
SteeleRobertOvalleNestor. 1984. “A Review and Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Behavioral Intentions and Employee Turnover.”Journal of Applied Psychology69:673–86.
47.
TettRobert P.MeyerJohn P. 1993. “Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-Analytic Findings.”Personnel Psychology66:259–93.
48.
TubreTravis C.CollinsJudith M. 2000. “Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance.”Journal of Management26:155–69.
49.
United States General Accounting Office. 1990. Recruitment and Retention: Inadequate Federal Pay Cited as Primary Problem by Agency Officials. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
50.
VandenbergRobert J.NelsonJodi B. 1999. “Disaggregating the Motives Underlying Turnover Intentions: When Do Intentions Predict Turnover Behavior?”Human Relations52:1313–36.
51.
WilliamsLarry J.HazerJohn T. 1986. “Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Re-Analysis of Using Latent Variable Structural Equation Methods.”Journal of Applied Psychology71:219–31.
52.
WilsonJames Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York, NY: Basic Books.
53.
WilsonPatricia A. 1994. “Power, Politics, and Other Reasons Why Senior Executives Leave the Federal Government.”Public Administration Review54:12–9.
54.
WrightBradley E. 2007. “Public Service Motivation: Does Mission Matter?”Public Administration Review67:54–64.
55.
WrightBradley E.PandeySanjay K. 2008. “Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person Organization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.”Administration & Society40:502–21.
56.
ZeytinogluIsik U.MargaretDentonSharonDaviesAndreaBaumannJenniferBlytheLindaBoos. 2007. “Deteriorated External Work Environment, Heavy Workload and Nurses' Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention.”Canadian Public Policy33:31–47.
57.
ZimmermanRyan D.DarnoldTodd C. 2009. “The Impact of Job Performance on Employee Turnover Intentions and the Voluntary Turnover Process: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model.”Personnel Review38:142–58.
