During the last 20 years public sector reforms focused on the increase of organizational performance mainly by implementing managerial tools and methods. The one-sided, output-oriented reforms meet with criticism. In our study we focus on the links between employee attitudes, managerial measures, institutional factors and organizational performance. Therefore, three attitudinal constructs, public service motivation, organizational commitment and job satisfaction, are analysed. The study empirically tests the effects of these dimensions on perceived performance in the federal administration of Switzerland. The analysed data of 13,532 federal employees give insight into the importance of employee commitment to the public interest and the need for goal-oriented management techniques. The results are discussed in light of previous studies.
Points for practitioners Public administration research raises more and more criticism against New Public Management reforms. This study, however, shows that there is an important link between managerial techniques and the individual perception of organizational performance in administrative practice. There are a range of private management tools immigrating into the public sector. But for the tools to be effective, practitioners need to integrate them with consideration of the specific requirements of the employee's commitment to the public interest.
Alonso, P. and Lewis, G.B. (2001) `Public Service Motivation and Job Performance: Evidence from the Federal Sector', American Review of Public Administration31(4): 363-80.
2.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Meier, K.J., O'Toole, L.J. Jr and Walker, R.M. (2005) `'Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Government' , Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(4): 489-504.
3.
Argyris, C. (1964) Integrating the Individual in the Organization . New York: John Wiley & Sons .
4.
Baldwin, J.N. (1984) `Are We Really Lazy?', Review of Public Personnel Administration4(2): 80-9.
5.
Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1990) `The Implications of Transactional and Transformational Leadership for Individual, Team, and Organizational Development', in W. Pasmore and R.W. Woodman (eds) Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 4, pp. 231-72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Bateman, T.S. and Strasser, S. (1984) `A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents of Organizational Commitment', Academy of Management Journal27(1): 95-112.
7.
Becker, B.E., Huselid, M.A. and Ulrich, D. (2001) The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy, and Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
Bogh Andersen, L. and Pallesen, T. (2008) ``Not Just for the Money? How Financial Incentives Affect the Number of Publications at Danish Research Institutions', International Public Management Journal11(1): 28-47.
9.
Bommer, W.H., Johnson, J.L., Rich, G.A., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (1995) `On the Interchangeability of Objective and Subjective Measures of Employee Performance: A Metaanalysis', Personnel Psychology48(3): 587-605.
10.
Boyne, G.A. (2002a) `Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales', Public Money and Management22: 17-24.
11.
Boyne, G.A. (2002b) `Public and Private Management: What's the Difference?' , Journal of Management Studies39: 97-122.
12.
Boyne, G.A. (2003) `Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(3): 367-94.
13.
Boyne, G.A., Farrell, C., Law, J., Powell, M. and Walker, R.M. (2003) Evaluating Public Management Reforms: Principles and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
14.
Boyne, G.A., Meier, K.J., O'Toole, L.J. and Walker, R.M. (2007) Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Brewer, G. (2006) `All Measures of Performance are Subjective: More Evidence on US Federal Agencies', in G.A. Boyne, K.J. Meier, L.J.J. O'Toole and R.M. Walker (eds) Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, pp. 35-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Brewer, G. (2008) `Employee and Organizational Performance', in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 136-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Brewer, G.A. and Selden, S.C. (2000) `Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(4): 685-711.
18.
Brewer, G.A., Coleman Selden, S. and Facer II, R.L. (2000) `Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation' , Public Administration Review60(3): 254-64.
19.
Bright, L. (2005) `Public Employees with High Levels of Public Service Motivation', Review of Public Personnel Administration25(2): 138-54.
20.
Buelens, M. and Van den Broeck, H. (2007) `An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations `, Public Administration Review67(1): 65-74.
21.
Burns, J.M. (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
22.
Cameron, J. and Pierce, W.D. (2002) Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Resolving the Controversy. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
23.
Camilleri, E. (2006) `Towards Developing an Organisational Commitment - Public Service Motivation Model for the Maltese Public Service Employees `, Public Policy and Administration21(1): 63-83.
24.
Camilleri, E. (2007) `Antecedents Affecting Public Service Motivation' , Personnel Review36(3): 356-77.
25.
Castaing, S. (2006) `The Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Commitment in the French Civil Service', Public Policy and Administration21(1): 84-98.
26.
Corporate Leadership Council (2002) Building the High-performance Workforce: A Quantitative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Performance Management Strategies. Washington, DC: Corporate Leadership Council.
27.
Crewson, P.E. (1997) `Public-service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7(4): 499-518.
28.
Cummings, L.L. (1983) `Organizational Effectiveness and Organizational Behavior: A Critical Perspective', in K.S. Cameron and D.A. Whetten (eds) Organizational Effectiveness. A Comparison of Multiple Models, pp. 187-203. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
30.
Delaney, J.T. and Huselid, M.A. (1996) `The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance `, The Academy of Management Journal39(4): 949-69.
31.
Diekmann, A. (2002) Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, 9th edn. Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Etzioni, A. (1964) Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
Frank, S.A. (2004) `Government Employees', American Review of Public Administration34(1): 36-51.
35.
Frey, B.S. (1997) Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personnel Motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36.
Frey, B.S. and Jegen, R. (2001) `Motivation Crowding Theory', Journal of Economic Surveys15(5): 589-611.
37.
Gabris, G.T. and Simo, G. (1995) `Public Sector Motivation as an Independent Variable Affecting Career Decisions', Public Personnel Management24(1): 33-51.
38.
Gross, E. and Etzioni, A. (1985) Organizations in Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Gruening, G. (2001) `Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management' , International Public Management Journal4: 1-25.
40.
Hennessey, T.J.J. (1998) `Reinventing Government: Does Leadership Make the Difference?', Public Administration Review58(6): 522-32.
41.
Herzberg, F. (1966) Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.
42.
Hood, C. (1991) `A Public Management for all Seasons?', Public Administration69(1): 3-19.
43.
Horton, S. (2006) `The Public Service Ethos in the British Civil Service: An Historical Institutional Analysis', Public Policy and Administration21(1): 32-48.
44.
Horton, S. (2008) `History and Persistence of an Idea and an Ideal' , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 17-32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Horton, S. and Hondeghem, A. (2006) `Public Service Motivation and Commitment', Public Policy and Administration21(1): 1-12.
46.
House, R.J. (1971) `A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness `, Administrative Science Quarterly16(3): 321-39.
47.
House, R.J. (1996) `Path-goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and a Reformulated Theory `, The Leadership Quarterly7(3): 323-52.
48.
House, R.J., Filley, A.C. and Kerr, S. (1971) `Relation of Leader Consideration and Initiating Structure to R and D Subordinates' Satisfaction', Administrative Science Quarterly16(1): 19-30.
49.
Houston, D.J. (2000) `Public-service Motivation: A Multivariate Test' , Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(4): 713-27.
50.
Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Bono, J.E. and Patton, G.K. (2001) `The Job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationship: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review', Psychological Bulletin127(3): 376-407.
51.
Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. and Ilies, R. (2004) `The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Reserach', Journal of Applied Psychology89(1): 36-51.
52.
Kalleberg, A.L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P.V. and Spaeth, J.L. (1996) Organisations in America: Analysing their Structures and Human Resource Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.
53.
Kim, S. (2005) `Individual-level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(2): 245-61.
54.
Knoke, D. and Wright-Isak, C. (1982) `Individual Motives and Organizational Incentive Systems', Research in the Sociology of Organizations1: 209-54.
55.
Kristof, A.L. (1996) `Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of its Conceptualizations, Measurements, and Implications', Personnel Psychology49(1): 1-49.
56.
Latham, G.P., Erez, M. and Locke, E.A. (1988) `Resolving Scientific Disputes by the Joint Design of Crucial Experiments by the Antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham Dispute Regarding Participation in Goal Setting', Journal of Applied Psychology73(4): 753-72.
57.
Likert, R.L. (1961) The Human Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Locke, E.A. (1976) `The Nature and Cause of Job Satisfaction', in M.D. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 1297-349. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
59.
Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. (1990) A Theory of Goal-setting and Task Performance. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York, Toronto, London.
61.
March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958) Organizations: Its Management and Value, 6th edn. 1965. New York: McGraw-Hill.
62.
Mathieu, J.E. and Zajac, D.M. (1990) `A Review and Meta-analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment', Psychological Bulletin108(2): 171-94.
63.
Matiaske, W. and Weller, I. (2003) `Extra-Rollenverhalten', in A. Martin (ed.) Organizational Behaviour: Verhalten in Organisationen , pp. 95-114. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
64.
Mayo, E. (1933) The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization . New York: The Macmillan Co.
65.
Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J. (1991) `A Three-component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment', Human Resource Management Review1: 61-89.
66.
Meyer, J.P., Paunonen, S.V., Gellatly, I.R., Goffin, R.D. and Jackson, D.N. (1989) `Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: It's the Nature of the Commitment that Counts', Journal of Applied Psychology17: 717-33.
67.
Meyer, K.J. and O'Toole, L. (2002) `Public Management and Performance. The Impact of Managerial Quality', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21: 629-43.
68.
Meyer, R. and Hammerschmid, G. (2006) `Public Management Reform: An Identity Project', Public Policy and Administration21(1): 99-115.
69.
Miles, R.H. and Petty, M.M. (1977) `Leader Effectiveness in Small Bureaucracies', The Academy of Management Journal20(2): 238-50.
70.
Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. and Porter, L.W. (1979) `The Measurement of Organizational Commitment' , Journal of Vocational Behavior14: 224-7.
71.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. (1982) Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
72.
Moynihan, D.P. (2008) `The Normative Model in Decline? Public Service Motivation in the Age of Governance', in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 248-67. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
73.
Moynihan, D.P. and Pandey, S.K. (2005) `Testing a Model of Public Sector Performance: How does Management Matter?' Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(3): 421-39.
74.
Moynihan, D.P. and Pandey, S.K. (2007) `The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation', Public Administration Review67(1): 40-53.
75.
Muchinsky, P.M. and Monahan, C.J. (1987) `What is Person-Environment Congruence? Supplementary versus Complementary Models of Fit `, Journal of Vocational Behavior31(3): 268-77.
76.
Naff, K.C. and Crum, J. (1999) `Working for America: Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference?', Review of Public Personnel Administration19(4): 5-16.
Oecd (2005) Performance-related Pay Policies for Government Employees. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
79.
Ouchi, W.G. (1979) `A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms', Management Science25(9): 833-48.
80.
Paarlberg, L.E., Perry, J.L. and Hondeghem, A. (2008) `From Theory to Practice: Strategies for Applying Public Service Motivation', in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 268-93. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
81.
Pandey, S.K. and Scott, P.G. (2002) `Red Tape: A Review and Assessment of Concepts and Measures', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12(4): 553-80.
82.
Pandey, S.K., Coursey, D.H. and Moynihan, D.P. (2007) `Organizational Effectiveness and Bureaucratic Red Tape', Public Performance and Management Review30(3): 398-425.
83.
Park, S.M. and Rainey, H.G. (2008) `Leadership and Public Service Motivation in US Federal Agencies', International Public Management Journal11(1): 109-42.
84.
Parkinson, C.N. (1957) Parkinson's Law. Cambridge: The Riverside Press.
85.
Perry, J.L. (1996) `Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6(1): 5-22.
86.
Perry, J.L. and Vandenabeele, W. (2008) `Behavioral Dynamics: Institutions, Identities, and Selfregulation', in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 56-79. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
87.
Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990) `The Motivational Bases of Public Service', Public Administration Review50(3): 367-73.
88.
Perry, J.L., Mesch, D. and Paarlberg, L. (2006) `Motivating Employees in a New Governance Era: The Performance Paradigm Revisited', Public Administration Review66(4): 505-14.
89.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
90.
Pollitt, C. (2005) `Decentralization: A Central Concept in Contemporary Public Management' The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, pp. 371-97. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
91.
Pollitt, C. (2007) `Convergence or Divergence: What has been Happening in Europe?', in C. Pollitt, S. Van Thiel and V. Homburg (eds) New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives , pp. 10-25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
92.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93.
Popovich, M.G. (1998) Creating High Performance Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rainey, H.G. (1979) `Perceptions of Incentives in Business and Government: Implications for Civil Service Reform', Public Administration Review39(5): 440-8.
96.
Rainey, H.G. (1982) `Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic', American Review of Public Administration16(4): 288-302.
97.
Rainey, H.G. (1989) `Public Management: Recent Research on the Political Context and Managerial Roles, Structures, and Behaviors', Journal of Management15(2): 229-50.
98.
Rainey, H.G. (1993) `Toward a Theory of Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations' , in J.L. Perry (ed.) Research in Public Administration, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CN : JAI Press.
99.
Rainey, H.G. and Steinbauer, P. (1999) `Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9(1): 1-32.
100.
Ritz, A. (2003) Evaluation von New Public Management: Grundlagen und empirische Ergebnisse der Bewertung von Verwaltungsreformen in der Schweizerischen Bundesverwaltung. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.
101.
Roethlisberger, F.J. (1959) Management and Morale. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
102.
Romzek, B.S. (1990) `Employee Investment and Commitment: The Ties that Bind', Public Administration Review50(3): 574-82.
103.
Ryan, R.M. and Connell, J.P. (1989) `Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5): 749-61.
104.
Schedler, K. (2003) `"And Politics?" Public Management Developments in the Light of Two Rationalities', Public Management Review5(4): 533-50.
105.
Spector, P.E. (1994) `Using Self-report Questionnaires in OB Research: A Comment on the Use of a Controversial Method', Journal of Organizational Behavior15: 385-92.
106.
Steers, R.M. (1975) `Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness', Administrative Science Quarterly20(4): 546-58.
107.
Steijn, B. and Leisink, P. (2006) `Organizational Commitment among Dutch Public Sector Employees', International Review of Administrative Sciences72(2): 187-201.
108.
Taylor, J. (2008) `Organizational Influences, Public Service Motivation and Work Outcomes: AnAustralian Study', International Public Management Journal11(1): 67-88.
109.
Thompson, J.R. (2000) `Reinvention as Reform: Assessing the National Performance Review', Public Administration Review60(6): 508-21.
110.
Vandenabeele, W. (2007) `Toward a Public Administration Theory of Public Service Motivation: An Institutional Approach', Public Management Review9(4): 545-56.
111.
Vandenabeele, W. and Van der Walle, S. (2008) `International Differences in Public Service Motivation: Comparing Regions across the World', in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (eds) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, pp. 223-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112.
Vandenabeele, W., Scheepers, S. and Hondeghem, A. (2006) `Public Service Motivation in an International Comparative Perspective: The UK and Germany', Public Policy and Administration21(1): 13-31.
113.
Van Wart, M. (2005) Dynamics of Leadership in Public Service: Theory and Practice. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe .
114.
Von Rosenstiel, L. (2007) Grundlagen der Organisationspsychologie, 6th edn. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
115.
Walker, R.M. and Boyne, G.A. (2006) `Public Management Reform and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Assessment of the UK Labour Government's Public Service Improvement Strategy', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management25(2): 371-93.
116.
Wall, T.D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S.J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C.W. and West, M. (2004) `On the Validity of Subjective Measures of Company Performance', Personnel Psychology57(1): 95-118.
117.
Wright, B.E. (2004) `The Role of Work Context in Work Motivation: A Public Sector Application of Goal and Social Cognitive Theories', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14(1): 59-78.
118.
Wright, B.E. (2007) `Public Service and Motivation: Does Mission Matter?' , Public Administration Review67(1): 54-64.
119.
Yousef, D.A. (2000) `Organizational Commitment: A Mediator of the Relationships of Leadership Behavior with Job Satisfaction and Performance in a Non-Western Country', Journal of Managerial Psychology15(1): 6-28.
