Despite the proliferation of published work using the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) data, the scholarly community to date lacks a review of the practices and value associated with how scholars have used the survey data in their research. We turn a lens at the public administration research that has used the FEVS to this point. We assess the extent to which peer-reviewed studies follow the fundamental criteria of conducting empirical studies using survey data—from accepted guidelines and practices for preinferential evaluations of survey data to the reporting of baseline and advanced standards and practices of analytical methods for measurement and quantitative analysis. Our review provides an overarching appraisement of public management scholarship employing the FEVS, which can strengthen the partnership between OPM and public administration scholars as they jointly continue improving the survey instrument and pursue questions critical to effective governance.
AndersonJ.DavidW. G. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
3.
BassB. M.BassR. (2008). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and application. Free Press.
4.
BennettC.KhanguraS.BrehautJ. C.GrahamI. D.MoherD.PotterB. K.GrimshawJ. M. (2011). Reporting guidelines for survey research: An analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001069.
5.
*BertelliA. M. (2006). Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the U.S. internal revenue service. International Public Management Journal, 9, 3-23. doi:10.1080/10967490600625191
6.
*BertelliA. M. (2007). Determinants of bureaucratic turnover intention: Evidence from the department of the treasury. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 235-258. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul003
7.
BiddleB. J.MarjorieM. M. (1988). Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. Child Development, 58(1), 4-17.
8.
*CaillierJ. G. (2012a). Agency retaliation against whistle-blowers. Public Integrity, 15, 29-50. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922150102
9.
*CaillierJ. G. (2012b). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 461-480. doi:10.1177/0275074011409394
10.
*CaillierJ. G. (2013a). Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the United States federal government than non-teleworkers are?The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 72-88. doi:10.1177/0275074011425084
11.
*CaillierJ. G. (2013b). Satisfaction with work-life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 340-364. doi:10.1177/0734371X12443266
12.
ChambersD. W.LicariF. W. (2009). The importance of survey research standards. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 1-4.
13.
*ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 382-406. doi:10.1177/0734371X11421495
14.
*ChoY. J.RingquistE. J. (2011). Managerial trustworthiness and organizational outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 53-86. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq015
15.
*ChoY. J.SaiN. (2013). Does organizational justice matter in the federal workplace?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 227-251. doi:10.1177/0734371X12458126
16.
*ChoiS. (2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 603-630. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun010
17.
*ChoiS. (2013). Demographic diversity of managers and employee job satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 275-298. doi:10.1177/0734371X12453054
18.
*ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2010). Managing diversity in U.S. federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70, 109-121.
19.
*ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2014). Organizational fairness and diversity management in public organizations: Does fairness matter in managing diversity?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 307-331. doi:10.1177/0734371X13486489
20.
CohenG.BlakeR. S.GoodmanD. (2016). Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 240-263. doi:10.1177/0734371X15581850
21.
CoteJ. A.BuckleyM. R. (1988). Measurement error and theory testing in consumer research: an illustration of the importance of construct validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 579-582.
22.
CramptonS. M.JohnA. W.III. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: an investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67-76.
23.
*CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
24.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281.
25.
DaleA. (2006). Quality issues with survey research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 143-158.
26.
DanekeG. A.Klobus-EdwardsP. (1979). Survey research for public administrators. Public Administration Review, 39, 421-426.
27.
EdwardsJ. R. (2000). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144-192.
28.
FaveroN.BullockJ. B. (2014). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285-308.
29.
*FernandezS. (2008). Examining the effects of leadership behavior on employee perceptions of performance and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 175-205. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576320201
30.
*FernandezS.ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 308-323. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.009
31.
*FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2011). Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: Does it work?The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 23-47. doi:10.1177/0275074009355943
32.
*FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2013a). Employee empowerment, employee attitudes, and performance: Testing a causal model. Public Administration Review, 73, 490-506. doi:10.1111/puar.12049
33.
*FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2013b). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 155-187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus008
34.
*FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2015). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction in the U.S. federal bureaucracy: A self-determination theory perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 45, 375-401. doi:10.1177/0275074013507478
35.
*FernandezS.PittsD. W. (2011). Understanding employee motivation to innovate: Evidence from front line employees in United States federal agencies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 202-222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00726.x
36.
FernandezS.ReshW. G.MoldogazievT.OberfieldZ. W. (2015). Assessing the past and promise of the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey for public management research: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 75, 382-394. doi:10.1111/puar.12368
37.
FieldsD. L. (2002). Taking the measure of work: A guide to validated scales for organizational research and diagnosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
FinchamJ. E.DraugalisJ. R. (2013). The importance of survey research standards. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 1-4.
39.
FongD. Y. T.HoS. Y.LamT. H. (2010). Evaluation of internal reliability in the presence of inconsistent responses. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(1), Article 27.
40.
FurrR. M.BacharachV. R. (2008). Psychometrics and the importance of psychological measurement. Psychometrics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37, 245-270.
HeinrichC. J.HillC. J. (2010). Multilevel models in the study of bureaucracy. In DurantR. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 833-867). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
*JongJ.FordM. T. (2016). The lagged effects of job demands and resources on organizational commitment in federal government agencies: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 475-492. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv040
45.
JudgeT. A.ChurchA. H. (2000). Job satisfaction: Research and practice. In CooperC. L.LockeE. A. (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46.
*JungC. S. (2010). Predicting organizational actual turnover rates in the U.S. federal government. International Public Management Journal, 13, 297-317. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.504124
KelleyK.ClarkB.BrownV.SitziaJ. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15, 261-266.
49.
*KellisD. S.RanB. (2013). Modern leadership principles for public administration: Time to move forward. Journal of Public Affairs, 13, 130-141. doi:10.1002/pa.1453
50.
*KimC.SchachterH. L. (2015). Exploring followership in a public setting: Is it a missing link between participative leadership and organizational performance?The American Review of Public Administration, 45, 436-457. doi:10.1177/0275074013508219
51.
*KimJ.-O.WigginsM. E. (2011). Family-friendly human resource policy: Is it still working in the public sector?Public Administration Review, 71, 728-739. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02412.x
52.
*KimT.MullinsL. B. (2016). How does supervisor support and diversity management affect employee participation in work/family policies?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 80-105. doi:10.1177/0734371X14553883
53.
*KoJ.HurS. (2014). The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: Integrated understanding based on social exchange Theory. Public Administration Review, 74, 176-187. doi:10.1111/puar.12160
54.
KrautA. I. (1996). Organizational surveys. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55.
KrosnickJ. A.PresserS.FealingK. H.RugglesS. (2015). The future of survey research: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco, CA: The National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Subcommittee on Advancing SBE Survey Research.
56.
LangbeinL.FelbingerC. L. (2006). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
57.
LathamG. P. (2012). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
LeeG.Benoit-BryanJ.JohnsonT. P. (2012). Survey research in public administration: Assessing mainstream journals with a total survey error framework. Public Administration Review, 72, 87-97.
59.
*LeeH.CayerN. J.LanG. Z. (2006). Changing federal government employee attitudes since the civil service reform act of 1978. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 21-51. doi:10.1177/0734371X05276936
60.
*LeeJ. W.ChoY. J. (2011). In search of a better fit: Exploring conditions for successful performance-based human resources management in U.S. federal agencies. International Review of Public Administration, 16, 89-112. doi:10.1080/12294659.2011.10805209
61.
*LeeS.-Y.HongJ. H. (2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71, 870-879.
62.
*LeeS. Y.WhitfordA. B. (2008). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 647-671. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum029
63.
LewisG. B.PittsD. (2016). Deciding to retire from the federal service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38, 49-82. doi:10.1177/0734371X16639110
64.
LiH.-T.ThomasS. M.FaragA.DuffettM.GargA. X.NaylorK. L. (2014). Quality of survey reporting in nephrology journals: A methodologic review. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 9, 2089-2094.
65.
MacCallumR. C.JamesT. A. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201-226.
66.
MelaiaS.AbrattR.BickG. (2008). Competencies of marketing managers in South Africa. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16, 233-246.
67.
MessickS. (1989). Validity. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
68.
MoldogazievT. T.ReshW. G. (2016). A systems theory approach to innovation implementation: Why organizational location matters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 677-692.
69.
*OberfieldZ. W. (2014a). Accounting for time: Comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74, 777-789. doi:10.1111/puar.12278
70.
*OberfieldZ. W. (2014b). Public management in time: A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 407-429. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus060
71.
*OhP. S.LewisD. E. (2007). Management and leadership performance in the defense department: Evidence from surveys of federal employees. Armed Forces & Society, 34, 639-661. doi:10.1177/0095327X07301255
72.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Government at a glance 2017. Paris, France: Author.
73.
OrrK.BennettM. (2012). Public administration scholarship and the politics of coproducing academic-practitioner research. Public Administration Review, 72, 487-496.
74.
*ParkS. M. (2012). Toward the trusted public organization. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 562-590. doi:10.1177/0275074011410417
75.
Personnel Management in Agencies, 5 CFR § 250 (2016).
76.
*PittsD. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69, 328-338.
77.
*PittsD.MarvelJ.FernandezS. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. federal employees. Public Administration Review, 71, 751-760.
78.
PodsakoffP. M.ScottB. M.Jeong-YeonL.NathanP. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
79.
ReaL. M.ParkerR. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
80.
RobbinsD. (1999). Questionnaire construction Chapter 6. In MillerG. J.WhickerM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 87-98). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
81.
*RubinE. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 125-143. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum035
82.
*SabharwalM. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 399-426. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut030
83.
SaetrenH. (2005). Facts and myths about research on public policy implementation: Out-of- fashion, allegedly dead, but still very much alive and relevant. The Policy Studies Journal, 33, 559-582.
84.
SomersM. J. (2018). Strategies for improving measurement models for secondary data in public administration research: Illustrations from the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. Public Administration Review, 78, 228-239.
85.
SpectorP. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction (No. 82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
StudemundA. H. (2006). Using econometrics: A practical guide (5th ed.). London, England: Pearson Education.
87.
TrottierT.Van WartM.WangX. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 68, 319-333. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00865.x
88.
TrumanB. (1945). Public opinion research as a tool of public administration. Public Administration Review, 5, 62-72.
89.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
90.
*WhitfordA. B.LeeS. Y. (2015). Exit, voice, and loyalty with multiple exit options: Evidence from the US federal workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 373-398. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu004
91.
*WhitfordA. B.LeeS.-Y.YunT.JungC. S. (2010). Collaborative behavior and the performance of government agencies. International Public Management Journal, 13, 321-349. doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.529378
92.
*WynenJ.de BeeckS.HondeghemA. (2013). Interorganizational mobility within the U.S. federal government: Examining the effect of individual and organizational factors. Public Administration Review, 73, 869-881. doi:10.1111/puar.12113
93.
*YangK. (2011). The Sisyphean fate of government-wide performance accountability reforms. Public Performance & Management Review, 35, 149-176. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350108
94.
*YangK.KassekertA. (2010). Linking management reform with employee job satisfaction: Evidence from federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 413-436. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup010
