To this day, the question what motivates public sector employees is central in public administration research. This exploratory study aims to delve into this question, arguing that different types of motives coexist and that different groups of individuals might be motivated by different motivational profiles. We use cluster analysis among public servants (N = 475) working at two municipalities in the Netherlands to explore these notions. Our findings show that different clusters of employees with different motivation profiles are indeed present in the data. In addition, they provide some indications about who the individuals in the clusters are in terms of demographic characteristics. These findings help, among other things, to explain the mixed findings of previous studies investigating sectional differences between public and private employees’ work motivation, and to identify specific human research activities tailored at individuals’ reward preferences.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Theme: Local Government: concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money and Management, 22(2), 17-24.
4.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C.FacerR. L.II. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60, 254-264.
5.
BuelensM.Van den BroeckH. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67, 65-74.
6.
BullockJ. B.StritchJ. M.RaineyH. G. (2015). International comparison of public and private employees’ work motives, attitudes, and perceived rewards. Public Administration Review, 75, 479-489.
7.
CamilleriE. (2006). Towards developing an organisational commitment—Public service motivation model for the Maltese public service employees. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 63-83.
8.
CerasoliC. P.NicklinJ. M.FordM. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980-1008.
9.
ChenC. A.BozemanB. (2013). Understanding public and nonprofit managers’ motivation through the lens of self-determination theory. Public Management Review, 15, 584-607.
10.
ChenG.JaradatS. A.BanerjeeN.TanakaT. S.KoM. S.ZhangM. Q. (2002). Evaluation and comparison of clustering algorithms in analyzing ES cell gene expression data. Statistica Sinica, 12, 241-262.
11.
ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes: Role of managerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 382-406.
12.
CrewsonP. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 499-518.
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134.
14.
FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2015). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction in the U.S. federal bureaucracy: A self-determination theory perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 45, 375-401.
15.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE.
16.
FrenchP. E.EmersonM. C. (2014). Assessing the variations in reward preference for local government employees in terms of position, public service motivation, and public sector motivation. Public Performance & Management Review, 37, 552-576.
17.
FreyB. S. (1994). How intrinsic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality and Society, 6, 334-352.
18.
GabrisG. T.SimoG. (1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24, 33-51.
19.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
20.
GagnéM.ForestJ.GilbertM. H.AubéC.MorinE.MalorniA. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628-646.
21.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154.
22.
HerzbergF. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World.
23.
HoustonD. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713-728.
24.
HoustonD. J. (2011). Implications of occupational locus and focus for public service motivation: Attitudes toward work motives across nations. Public Administration Review, 71, 761-771.
25.
HughesE. C. (1958). Men and their work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
26.
JacobsenC. B.HvitvedJ.AndersenL. B. (2014). Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92, 790-806.
27.
KarlK. A.SuttonC. L. (1998). Job values in today’s workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 27, 515-527.
28.
KaufmanL.RousseeuwP. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
29.
KellyR. M. (1998). An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 58, 201-208.
30.
KuvaasB. (2009). A test of hypotheses derived from self-determination theory among public sector employees. Employee Relations, 31, 39-56.
31.
Le GrandJ. (2003). Motivation, agency, and public policy: Of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388-403.
34.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66, 605-618.
35.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
36.
OvermanS.van GenugtenM.van ThielS. (2015). Accountability after structural disaggregation: Comparing agency accountability arrangements. Public Administration, 93, 1102-1120.
37.
ParkS. M.WordJ. (2012). Driven to service: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for public and nonprofit managers. Public Personnel Management, 41, 705-734.
38.
PedersenD. M. (2002). Intrinsic-extrinsic factors in sport motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 459-476.
39.
PerryJ. L.VandenabeeleW. V. (2008). Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities and self-regulation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 55-79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
PinderC. C. (2014). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
41.
RaineyH. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. The American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
42.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing pubilc organizations. San Fransisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
RencherA. C.ChristensenW. F. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
44.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76, 414-426.
45.
RousseeuwP. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65.
46.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
47.
SchottC.PronkJ. L. J. (2014). Investigating and explaining organizational antecedents of PSM. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2, 28-56.
48.
SharpeD. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what?Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1-10.
49.
StazykE. C. (2013). Crowding out public service motivation? Comparing theoretical expectations with empirical findings on the influence of performance-related pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 252-274.
50.
SteelP.KönigC. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 889-913.
51.
VandenabeeleW. V. (2008). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation (Doctoral thesis). KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
52.
Van de WalleS.SteijnB.JilkeS. (2015). Extrinsic motivation, PSM and labour market characteristics: A multilevel model of public sector employment preference in 26 countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 833-855. doi:10.1177/0020852314563899
53.
WeskeU.LeisinkP.KniesE. (2014). Local government austerity policies in the Netherlands: The effectiveness of social dialogue in preserving public service employment. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 20, 403-416.
