Previous studies have produced significant distinctions between public- and private-sector employees with respect to public service motivation (PSM) and PSM-related variables. Little, however, is known about whether those variables are associated with employment choice at a pre-entry level. This article will address this gap in the literature by exploring the effect of PSM on college students’ sector choice in Korea. In previous research on PSM, three types of PSM measures—Perry’s PSM scale, work values, and prosocial behaviors—were utilized as a PSM variable. In exploring the association between PSM and sector choice, we employed the three measures. The empirical model showed that PSM and prosocial behaviors were not associated with public-sector choice. Only job security was found to be a main reason why college students intended to enter the public sector in Korea. We will discuss the implications of our findings in this article.
BaldwinJ. N. (1991). Public versus private employees: Debunking stereotype. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 11, 1-27.
2.
BangchengL. (2009). Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 349-366.
3.
BangchengL.TangN. Y.ZhuX. M. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29, 684-699.
4.
BehnR. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55, 313-324.
5.
BelleateD.LinkA. N. (1981). Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34(3), 408-412.
6.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 685-711.
7.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C.FacerR. L.II. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60, 254-264.
8.
BrightL. (2005). Public employees with high levels of public service motivation: Who are they, where are they, and what do they want?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 138-154.
9.
BrightL. (2011) Does public service motivation affect the occupation choices of public employees?Public Personnel Management, 40(1): 11-24.
10.
BuchananB. (1975). Red-tape and service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6, 423-444.
11.
ChatmanJ. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
12.
ChetkovichC. (2003). What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students. Public Administration Review, 63, 660-674.
13.
ChristensenR. K.WrightB. E. (2011). The effects of public sector motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 723-743.
14.
CrewsonP. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 499-518.
15.
DoverG. J. (2010). Public sector volunteering: Committed staff, multiple logics, and contradictory strategies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30, 235-256.
16.
DownsA. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
17.
FlanaganC. A.BowesJ. M.JonssonB.CsapoB.SheblanovaE. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 457-475.
18.
FrankS. A.LewisG. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?American Review of Public Administration, 34, 36-51.
19.
GabrisG. T.SimoG. (1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24, 33-51.
20.
GailmardS. (2010). Politics, principal-agent problems, and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13, 35-45.
21.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.
22.
HoustonD. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713-727.
23.
HoustonD. J. (2006). “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 67-86.
24.
KhojastehM. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Public Personnel Management, 22, 391-401.
25.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261.
26.
KimS. (2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 722-740.
27.
KimS. (2009). Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 839-851.
28.
KimS.LeeJ. H. (2006). Changing facets of Korean higher education: Market competition and the role of the state. Higher Education, 52, 557-587.
29.
KimS.LeeJ. H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58, 259-296.
30.
KimS.VandenabeeleW. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5): 701-709.
31.
KjeldsenA. M. (2012). Vocational study and public service motivation: Disentangling the socializing effects of higher education. International Public Management Journal, 15, 500-524.
32.
KoehlerM.RaineyH. G. (2008). Interdisciplinary foundations of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management (pp. 33-55). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
LangbeinL. (2010). Economics, public service motivation, and pay for performance: Complements or substitutes?International Public Management Journal, 13, 9-23.
34.
LeeH.CayerN. J.LanG. Z. (2006). Changing federal government employee attitudes since the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 21-51.
35.
LeeM. J. (2010). Critical review on public service motivation. Seoul Association for Public Administration, Seoul, Korea.
36.
LeeY. J.WilkinsV. M. (2011). More similarities or more differences? Comparing public and nonprofit managers’ job motivation. Public Administration Review, 71, 45-56.
37.
Le GrandJ. (2010). Knights and knaves return: Public service motivation and the delivery of public services. International Public Management Journal, 13, 56-71.
38.
LeisinkP.SteijnB. (2008). Recruitment, attraction, and selection. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management (pp. 118-135). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
LewisD. E. (2010). Measurement and public service motivation: New insights, old questions. International Public Management Journal, 13, 46-55.
40.
LewisG. B.FrankS. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review, 62, 395-404.
41.
LightP. C. (2002). The content of their character: The state of the nonprofit workforce. Nonprofit Quarterly, 9(3), 6-16.
42.
MannG. A. (2006). A motive to serve: Public service motivation in human resource management and the role of PSM in the nonprofit sector. Public Personnel Management, 35, 33-48.
43.
MoynihanD. P. (2008). The normative model in decline? Public service motivation in the age of governance. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management (pp. 247-267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
MoynihanD. P. (2010). A workforce of cynics? The effects of contemporary reforms on public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13, 24-34.
45.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
46.
NaffK. C.CrumJ. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19, 5-16.
47.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine, Atherton.
48.
PaarlbergL. E. (2007). The impact of customer orientation on government employee performance. International Public Management Journal, 10, 201-231.
49.
ParkH. M.ParkH. (2006). Diffusing information technology education in Korean undergraduate public affairs and administration programs: Driving forces and challenging issues. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12, 537-555.
50.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1): 5-22.
51.
PerryJ. L.EngbersT. A.JunS. Y. (2009). Back to the future? performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69, 39-51.
52.
PerryJ. L.MeschD.PaarlbergL. (2006). Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review, 66, 505-514.
53.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
54.
RaineyH. G. (1982). Rewards preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
55.
RaineyH. G.BackoffR. W.LevineC. L. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-246.
56.
RiouxS. M.PennerL. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 288-297.
57.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personal Psychology, 40, 437-453.
58.
SchneiderB.GoldsteinH. W.SmithD. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747-773.
59.
SchneiderB.SmithD. B.TaylorS.FleenorJ. (1998). Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 462-470.
60.
ScottP. G.PandeyS. K. (2005). Red tape and public service motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 155-180.
61.
StaatsE. B. (1988). Public service and the public interest. Public Administration Review, 48, 601-605.
62.
VandenabeeleW. (2007) Towards a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4): 545-56.
63.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer or choice. Public Administration, 86, 1089-1105.
64.
VandenabeeleW.SteenT. (2004). The civil service as an employer of choice in Belgium. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24, 319-333.
65.
WilsonJ.MusickM. A. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
66.
WittmerD. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14, 369-383.
67.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K. (2010). Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction-selection-attrition model. International Public Management Journal, 13, 155-176.
68.
WrightB. E.GrantA. M. (2010). Unanswered questions about public service motivation: Designing research to address key issues of emergence and effects. Public Administration Review, 70, 691-700.
