Using Albert Hirschman's (1970) theory of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as measures of organizational effectiveness, this study examines the response of supervisors to dealing with poor performers. In recent years, the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board has focused its Merit Principles Surveys (MPS) on issues directly linked to its role—prohibited practices, retention, grievance and discipline, and so on—and the role supervisors play in their cause and remedy. In the 2000 MPS, there are a number of items that address supervisory efforts in dealing with “poor performers.” These run the gamut from identifying performance discrepancies through providing feedback and developmental opportunities to seeking removal. There are also items that assess the supervisors' perceptions of difficulties in engaging in these activities. Using regression analyses, the author examines these factors with respect to their impact on individual supervisors' perceptions of their own organizational engagement. The performance appraisal process and management support prove especially important in maintaining positive supervisory attitudes.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2.
Becker, T., Billings, R.S., Eveleth, D.M., & Gilbert, N.L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779-801.
3.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Cannon, M.D., & Witherspoon, R. (2005). Actionable feedback: Unlocking the power of learning and performance improvement. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 120-134.
5.
Carnevale, D.G. (1995). Trustworthy government: Leadership and management strategies for building trust and high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Carnevale, D.G., & Wechsler, B. (1992). Organizational trust in the public sector: A model of its determinants. Administration & Society, 23, 471-494.
7.
Condrey, S.E. (1995). Reforming human resource management systems: Exploring the importance of organizational trust. American Review of Public Administration, 25, 341-354.
8.
Crawford, K., Thomas, E., & Fink, J. (1980). Pygmalion at sea: Improving work effectiveness of low performers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16, 482-505.
9.
Daley, D.M. (1988). Profile of the uninvolved worker: The affect of administrative attitudes on organizational behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 65-90.
10.
Daley, D.M. (1991). Management practices and the uninvolved manager: The effect of supervisory attitudes on perceptions of organizational trust and change orientation. Public Personnel Management, 20, 101-113.
11.
Daley, D.M. (2001). Developmental performance appraisal: Feedback, interview, and disciplinary techniques. In K. T. Liou (Ed.), Handbook of public management practice and reform (pp. 243-259). New York: Marcel Dekker.
12.
Daley, D.M. (2002). Strategic human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Daley, D.M., & Pope, S.E. (2004). Perceptions of supervisory, middle managerial, and top managerial trust: The role of job satisfaction in organizational leadership . State and Local Government Review, 36, 130-139.
14.
Daley, D.M., & Vasu, M.L. (1998). Fostering organizational trust in North Carolina: The pivotal role of administrators and political leaders. Administration & Society, 30, 62-84.
15.
Daley, D.M., & Vasu, M.L. (2005). Supervisory perceptions of the impact of public sector personnel practices on the achievement of multiple goals: Putting the strategic into human resource management. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 157-167.
16.
Delaney, J.T., & Huselid, M.A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
17.
Delery, J.E., & Doty, D.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing strategic human resource management tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions . Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802-835.
18.
Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 596-606.
19.
Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C.E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 27, 78-95.
20.
Fitz-Enz, J. (1994). HR's new score card. Personnel Journal, 73, 84-87.
21.
Gabris, G.T. (1988). The uninvolved employee as a unique management problem: A symposium introduction. International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 1-26.
22.
Gabris, G., Mitchell, K., & Giles, W.A. (1988). Motivating the uninvolved worker: Some conceptual and empirical observations. International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 27-63.
23.
Harrison, D.A., Newman, D.A., & Roth, P.L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305-325.
24.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
25.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: The elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
26.
Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence . New York: John Wiley.
27.
Kellough, J.E., & Osuna, W. (1995). Cross-agency comparisons of quit rates in the federal service. Review of Public Personnel Administration , 15, 58-68.
28.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
29.
Roberts, G.E., & Reed, T. (1996). Performance appraisal participation, goal setting and feedback: The influence of supervisory style. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 29-60.
30.
Rusbult, C.E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
31.
Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45, 101-117.
32.
Rusbult, C.E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in reward, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 429-438.
33.
Rusbult, C.E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A.G., Iii. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction . Academy of Management Journal , 31, 559-627.
34.
Rusbult, C.E., & Lowery, D. (1985). When bureaucrats get the blues: Responses to dissatisfaction among federal employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 15, 80-103.
35.
Selden, S.D., & Moynihan, D.P. (2000). A model of voluntary turnover in state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration , 20, 63-74.
36.
Soden, D.L., & Lovrich, N.P. (1988). Motivating the unmotivated state employee through workplace participation: Research note from a pre- and post-intervention panel study. International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 91-115.
Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
39.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
40.
U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1999 , July). Federal supervisors and poor performers. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
41.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2003 ). The federal workforce for the 21st century: Results of the Merit Principles Survey 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (1999 , January). Poor performance in government: A quest for the true story. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
Ulrich, D. (1997). Measuring human resources: An overview of practice and a prescription for results. Human Resource Management , 36, 303-320.
44.
Whitford, A., & Lee, S.-Y. (in press). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the federal workforceJournal of Public Administration Theory and Research.
45.
Yeager, S.J., Rabin, J., & Vocino, T. (1985). Feedback and administrative behavior in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 45, 570-575.
