Character strengths are an important foundation for positive development and thriving in adolescence. Most research on character strengths has been conducted with youths in Western cultures. We examined character strengths in relation to positive and negative well-being indicators in a sample of Iranian youths. We investigated the reliability and validity of the Farsi version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (VIA Y-96)—a self-report survey commonly used in Western contexts. Participants were adolescents in Iran (N = 1,359; 48.5% female; M age = 13.54, SD = 1.00) who completed the VIA Y-96 and questionnaires assessing life satisfaction, positive/negative experiences, depression, anxiety, and stress. We found that reliability coefficients were acceptable for most of the VIA subscales. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), as well as a second-order CFA, supported the construct validity of the Farsi VIA Y-96. Correlations between the character strengths and positive and negative well-being indicators supported convergent validity. Measurement invariance for the VIA Y-96 was established in this study comparing boys’ and girls’ response patterns. Sex and grade level differences were found for some of the subscales. Overall, the Farsi VIA Y-96 had acceptable psychometric properties, suggesting that it can be used in research on character strengths with Iranian youths.
AazamiY.KanjaniM.SaderM. M. (2017). Confirmatory factor structure of depression, anxiety and stress scale in students. Jounal of Mazandaran University Medical Science. 27(154), 94-106. (Farsi).
2.
BensonP. L.LeffertN.ScalesP. C.BlythD. A. (2012). Beyond the “village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 16(1), 3-23.
3.
BiseggerC.CloettaB.von RuedenU.AbelT.Ravens-SiebererU., & the European Kidscreen Group. (2005). Health-related quality of life: Gender differences in childhood and adolescence. Social and Preventive Medicine, 50, 281-291.
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit Indexes for testing measurement invariance, structural equation modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsonR.J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
7.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
8.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.
9.
FischerR.FerreiraM. C.AssmarE.RedfordP.HarbC.GlazerS.ChengB.-S.JiangD.-Y.WongC. C.KumarN.KärtnerJ.HoferJ.AchouiM. (2009). Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms: Development of a subjective norm approach to culture measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 187-213.
10.
GamstG.MeyersL. S.GuarinoA. J. (2008). Analysis of variance designs: A conceptual and computational approach with SPSS and SAS. Cambridge University Press.
11.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.SalimianM.ChenZ. (2013). Shame and guilt: Relationships of test of self-conscious affect measures with psychological adjustment and gender differences in Iran. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 7(1), 97-109. (Farsi).
12.
GillhamJ.Adams-DeutschZ.WernerJ.ReivichK.Coulter-HeindlV.LinkinsM.PetersonC.ParkN.AbenavoliR.ConteroA.SeligmanM. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well–being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31-44.
13.
GouveiaV. V.MilfontT. L.da FonsecaP. N.CoelhoJ. A. P. M. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267-277.
14.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
15.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-135.
16.
HoomanH. (2005). Structural equation modeling using LISREL. SAMT Publication. (Farsi).
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
KlineP. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
20.
LawsheC. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28, 563-575.
21.
LernerR. M.DowlingE. M.AndersonP. M. (2003). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 172-180.
22.
LichensteinS. D.VerstynenT.ForbesE. E. (2016). Adolescent brain development and depression: A case for the importance of connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 271-287.
23.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP.F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety & stress scales. (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
24.
McGrathR. E.WalkerD. I. (2016). Factor structure of character strengths in youth: Consistency across ages and measures. Journal of Moral Education, 45(4), 400-418.
25.
MeyersL. S.GamstG.GuarinoA. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation.SAGE Publications, Inc.
26.
MilfontT. L.FischerR., (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 112-131.
27.
MoksnesU. K.LøhreA.ByrneD. G.HauganG. (2014). Satisfaction with life scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657-671.
28.
NiemiecR. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (the first 10 years). In KnoopH. H.Delle FaveA. (Eds.), Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology: Vol. 3. Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (pp. 11-29). Springer Science + Business Media.
29.
ParkN. (2004). Character strengths and positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 40-54.
30.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 13-23). Springer.
31.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891-909.
32.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2008). The cultivation of character strengths. In FerrariM.PotworowskiG. (Eds.), Teaching for wisdom (pp. 59-77). Springer.
33.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification.,American Psychological Association.
34.
ProctorC. (2013). The importance of good character. In ProctorC.LinleyP. (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents (pp. 13-21). Springer.
35.
ProctorC.TsukayamaE.WoodA. M.MaltbyJ.EadesJ. F.LinleyP. A. (2011). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 377-388.
36.
RuchW.WeberM.ParkN.PetersonC. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the German values in action inventory of strengths for youth (German VIA-youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 57-64.
37.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3-9). Oxford University Press.
38.
SeligmanM. E. P.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
39.
ShahidianH. (2002). Women in Iran: Gender politics in the islamic republic.Greenwood Publishing Group. (Persian).
40.
ShawT.CampbellM. A.RunionsK. C.ZubrickS. R. (2017). Properties of the DASS-21 in an Australian community adolescent population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(7), 879-892.
41.
SheikhiM.HoumanH. A.AhadiH.Sepah-MansourM. (2011). Psychometric properties of satisfaction with life scale. Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology, 5(19), 15-26. (Persian).
42.
SilvaA.Do Céu TaveiraM.MarquesC.GouveiaV. (2015). Satisfaction with life scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 309-318.
43.
SzaboM. (2010). The short version of the depression anxiety stress dcales (DASS-21): Factor structure in a young adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 1-8.
44.
TonerE.HaslamN.RobinsonJ.WilliamsP. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the values in action inventory of strengths for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 637-642.
45.
Van EedenC.WissingM. P.DreyerJ.ParkN.PetersonC. (2008). Validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth (VIA-Youth) among South African learners. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18, 145-156.
46.
WeberM.WagnerL.RuchW. (2016). Positive feelings at school: On the relationships between students' character strengths, school-related affect, and school functioning. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 341-355.
47.
WillemsenJ.MarkeyS.DeclercqF.VanheuleS. (2011). Negative emotionality in a large community sample of adolescents: The factor structure and measurement invariance of the short version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21). Stress and Health, 27(3), E120-E128.
48.
WilsonF. R.PanW.SchumskyD. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197-210.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
