Previous research suggests that students participating in school-based musical ensembles are more engaged in school and more likely to connect to their peers in school; however, researchers have not specifically investigated peer connectedness among adolescents in school-based music ensembles. The purpose of this study was to explore middle school band students’ perceptions of peer connectedness. Participants (N = 317) indicated moderately high levels of peer connectedness both within the concert band and school. Levels of peer connectedness differed between schools; however, no statistical difference was found by grade/band level or SES. Suggestions for future research and implications for youth development and music education professions are discussed.
AbrilC. R. (2013). Perspectives on the school band from hardcore American band kids. In CampbellP. S.WigginsT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of children’s musical cultures (pp. 435–448). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AdderleyC. (2009). Music in motion: An overture to the student experience in the high school marching band. In KerchnerJ.AbrilC. R. (Eds.), Musical experience in our lives: Things we learn and meanings we make (pp. 239–253). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
3.
AdderleyC.KennedyM.BerzW. (2003). “A Home Away from Home”: The world of the high school music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(3), 190–205. doi:10.2307/3345373
4.
American Educational Research Association. (2013). Prevention of bullying in schools, colleges, and universities: Research report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
BarberB. K.SchlutermanJ. M. (2008). Connectedness in the lives of children and adolescents: A call for greater conceptual clarity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 209–216.
6.
BergM. H. (1997). Social construction of musical experience in two high school chamber music ensembles (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9731212)
7.
BrittinR. (2001). Middle school instrumentalists’ perceptions of counting systems. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 148, 12–18.
8.
BurlandK.MageeW. (2014). Developing identities using music technology in therapeutic settings. Psychology of Music, 42(2), 177–189. doi:10.1177/0305735612463773
9.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters?Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(1), 10–43. doi:10.1177/0743558499141003
10.
FarbA. F.MatjaskoJ. L. (2012). Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review, 32(1), 1–48. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.10.001
11.
FeldmanA. F.MatjaskoJ. L. (2007). Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school-based extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Adolescence, 30(2), 313–332. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.004
12.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2006). The effect of instrumental music participation and socioeconomic status on Ohio fourth-, sixth-, and ninth-grade proficiency test performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 73–84. doi:10.1177/002242940605400106
13.
FoleyD. E. (2001). The great American football ritual: Reproducing race, class, and gender inequality. In YiannakisA.MelnickM. J. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in sociology of sport (pp. 23–40). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14.
FordL.DavidsonJ. W. (2003). An investigation of members’ roles in wind quintets. Psychology of Music, 31(1), 53–74. doi:10.1177/0305735603031001323
15.
GoldC.RolvsjordR.MosslerK.StigeB. (2013). Reliability and validity of a scale to measure interest in music among clients in mental health care. Psychology of Music, 41(5), 665–682. doi:10.1177/0305735612441739
16.
HamannD. L.MillsC.BellJ.DaughertyE.KoozerR. (1990). Classroom environment as related to contest ratings among high school performing ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 215–224.
17.
HofferC. R. (2008). Introduction to music education (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
18.
HumphreysJ. T. (1995). Instrumental music in American education: In service of many masters. Journal of Band Research, 20(2), 39–70.
19.
HumphreysJ. T. (2011). Observations about occupational identity among public school music teachers: Past and present. In Ward-SteinmannP. M. (Ed.), Advances in social-psychology and music education research (pp. 127–138). London, UK: Ashgate.
20.
HumphreysJ. T. (2012). Commentary: Ensembles. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 1 (pp. 785–789). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
KinneyD. A. (1999). From “headbangers” to “hippies”: Delineating adolescents’ active attempts to form an alternative culture. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 84, 21–35.
22.
KinneyD. W. (2010). Selected nonmusic predictors of urban students’ decisions to enroll and persist in middle school band programs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 334–350. doi:10.1177/0022429409350086
23.
KobusK. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98(S1), 37–55.
24.
KratusJ. (2007). Music education at the tipping point. Music Educators Journal, 94(2), 42–48. doi:10.1177/002743210709400209
25.
LaurenceF. (2008). Music and empathy. In UrbainO. (Ed.), Music and conflict: Transformation harmonies and dissonances in geopolitics (pp. 13–25). London, UK: IB Tauris & Co.
26.
MartinL. (2012). The musical self-efficacy beliefs of middle school band students: An investigation of sources, meanings, and relationships with attributions for success and failure. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 191, 45–60.
27.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 6–17. doi:10.1177/002242940705500102
28.
McLarenK. L. (2002). Youth development: A review of research on how to achieve good outcomes for young people in their families, peer groups, schools, careers and communities. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Youth Affairs.
29.
MoranN. (2013). Music, bodies and relationships: An ethnographic contribution to embodied cognition studies. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 5–17. doi:10.1177/0305735611400174
30.
MorrisonS. J. (2001). The school ensemble a culture of our own. Music Educators Journal, 88(2), 24–28. doi:10.2307/3399738
31.
MorrisonV.BennettP. (2006). An introduction to health psychology. London, UK: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
32.
OmanR. F.VeselyS.AspyC. B.McLeroyK. R.RodineS.MarshallL. (2004). The potential protective effect of youth assets on adolescent alcohol and drug use. American Journal of Public Health, 94(8), 1425–1430.
33.
PallantJ. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Birmingham, UK: Open University Press.
34.
PayneP. D. (2009). An investigation of relationships between timbre preference, personality traits, gender, and music instrument selection of public school band students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3366051)
35.
PittmanK. J.IrbyM.TolmanJ.YohalemN.FerberT. (2011). Preventing problems, promoting development, encouraging engagement. Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment.
36.
PrinsteinM. J.DodgeK. A. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
RabinowitchT.-C.CrossI.BurnardP. (2013). Long-term musical group interaction has a positive influence on empathy in children. Psychology of Music, 41(4), 484–498. doi:10.1177/0305735612440609
38.
RamzyL. M. (2012). Immigrant refugee adolescents: The relationships between peer connectedness, academic self-efficacy, educational barriers, parental monitoring, and school engagement (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3544914)
39.
RawlingsJ. R. (2015). Traversing the terrain of music competitions: Curricular mapping with adjudicated events in mind. In ConwayC. M. (Ed.) Musicianship-focused curriculum and assessment (pp. 425–456). Chicago, IL: GIA.
40.
RawlingsJ. R. (2016). Development and validation of the adolescent musicians’ perceptions of connectedness scale (AMPCS): An initial investigation. In BrophyT.S.MarlattJ.RitcherG. K. (Eds.), Connecting practice, measurement, and evaluation: Selected papers from the 5th International Symposium on Assessment in Music Education, (pp. 289–303). Chicago, IL: GIA.
41.
RyanA. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101–111. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4
42.
RyanA. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150. doi:10.1111/1467–8624.00338
43.
ScheibJ. W. (2006). Lindy’s story: One student’s experience in middle school band. Music Educators Journal, 92(5), 32–36. doi:10.2307/3878499
44.
SievingR. E.BeuhringT.ResnickM. D.BearingerL. H.ShewM.IrelandM.BlumR. W. (2001). Development of adolescent self-report measures from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28(1), 73–81. doi:10.1016/S1054–139X(00)00155–5
45.
SmallC. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
VanceJ. (2014). Findings from the field: A pedagogical and cultural study of the North American drum and bugle corps experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
48.
WilsonG. B.MacDonaldR. A. R. (2012). The sign of silence: Negotiating musical identities in an improvising ensemble. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 558–573. doi:10.1177/0305735612449506
49.
YugoM.DavidsonM. J. (2007). Connectedness within social contexts: The relation to adolescent health. Healthcare Policy, 2(3), 47–55.
