Psychometric Properties of the 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a Hong Kong Sample

Abstract

The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework comprising task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, and other-avoidance goals is the most recent conceptual development in goal orientation research. The purpose of this study was to extend the current literature by investigating the validity of the 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a non-Western educational setting. Based on a sample of 384 first-year undergraduate students from a university in Hong Kong, confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the six-factor model of achievement goals provided better fit to the data than 10 alternative model structures tested. The six goal subscales have high internal consistency reliability, and gender invariance of the instrument was established via multigroup analysis. Results from multiple regression analyses also revealed that the six achievement goals were differentially predictive of students’ academic performance, deep and surface learning strategies, and instrumental help-seeking.

Keywords

confirmatory factor analysis criterion validity achievement goals deep and surface learning strategies help-seeking strategies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Ames

(1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A motivational analysis. In Ames

Ames

(Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 177-207). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Bagozzi

R. P.

(1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94. doi:10.1177/009207038801600107

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Bentler

P. M.

Bonett

D. G.

(1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Bouffard

Vezeau

Bordeleau

(1998). A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 309-319. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01293.x

Brown

Cudeck

(1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834

10.

Diseth

(2015). The advantages of task-based and other-based achievement goals as standards of competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 59-69. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.011

11.

Dweck

C. S.

(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040

12.

Elliot

A. J.

(1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3

13.

Elliot

A. J.

McGregor

H. A.

(1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628

14.

Elliot

A. J.

McGregor

H. A.

(2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501

15.

Elliot

A. J.

McGregor

H. A.

Gable

(1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549

16.

Elliot

A. J.

Murayama

Pekrun

(2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632-648. doi:10.1037/a0023952

17.

Elliot

A. J.

Thrash

T. M.

(2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 804-818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804

18.

Entwistle

McCune

Hounsell

(2002). Occasional report 1: Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Edinburgh, UK: ETL Project, Higher and Community Education, The School of Education, University of Edinburgh. Available from http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl

19.

Graham

J. M.

(2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930-944. doi:10.1177/0013164406288165

20.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Barron

K. E.

Tauer

J. M.

Carter

S. M.

Elliot

A. J.

(2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316

21.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Linnenbrink

E. A.

(2005). Multiple achievement goals and multiple pathways for learning: The agenda and impact of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75-84. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_2

22.

Hulleman

C. S.

Schrager

S. M.

Bodmann

S. M.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422-449. doi:10.1037/a0018947

23.

Karabenick

S. A.

(2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569-581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569

24.

Lee

Ning

Goh

H. C.

(2014). Interaction between cognitive and non-cognitive factors: The influences of academic goal orientation and working memory on mathematical performance. Educational Psychology, 34, 73-91. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.836158

25.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

Tyson

D. F.

Patall

E. A.

(2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19-70.

26.

Maehr

M. L.

(1984). Meaning and motivation. In Ames

Ames

(Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 115-144). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

27.

Maehr

M. L.

Nicholls

J. G.

(1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In Warren

(Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 221-267). New York, NY: Academic Press.

28.

Maehr

M. L.

Zusho

(2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In Wentzel

K. R.

Wigfield

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77-104). New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Meece

J. L.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

Hoyle

R. H.

(1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514

30.

Meece

J. L.

Holt

(1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582

31.

Middleton

M. J.

Midgley

(1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710

32.

Muthén

B. O.

Kaplan

(1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x

33.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

34.

Ning

H. K.

Downing

(2010). Stability of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory: A longitudinal analysis of Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 525-537.

35.

Pekrun

Elliot

A. J.

Maier

M. A.

(2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583

36.

Phan

H. P.

(2009). Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 29, 297-313. doi:10.1080/01443410902877988

37.

Roussel

Elliot

A. J.

Feltman

(2011). The influence of achievement goals and social goals on help-seeking from peers in an academic context. Learning and Instruction, 21, 394-402. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.003

38.

Sclove

S. L.

(1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360

39.

Wolters

C. A.

Pintrich

P. R.

Karabenick

S. A.

(2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In Moore

K. A.

Lippman

L. H.

(Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251-270). New York, NY: Springer.

40.

Wolters

C. A.

S. L.

Pintrich

P. R.

(1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1