The aim of the present study was to test the cross-cultural validity of the five-factor structure of social goals that Dowson and McInerney proposed. Using both between-network and within-network approaches to construct validation, 1,147 Filipino high school students participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the five-factor model provided the best fit to the data compared with a series of alternative models. In addition, the five types of social goals also showed meaningful relationships to theoretically relevant constructs. Taken together, this study supports the applicability of the five-factor structure of social goals among Filipino respondents.
AishA. M.JoreskogK. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 19, 716-723.
2.
AmesC. A. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
4.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2007). Amos 16 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
5.
BernardoA. B. I.SalangaG. C.AguasK. M. (2008). Filipino adolescent students’ conceptions of learning goals. In TanO.McInerneyD. M.LiemA. D.TanA. G. (Eds.), What the West can learn from the East: Asian perspectives on the psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 169-190). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
6.
BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
8.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CampbellH. L.BarryC. L.JoeJ. N.FinneyS. J. (2008). Configural, metric, and scalar invariance of the Modified Achievement Goal Questionnaire across African American and White university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 988-1007.
10.
ChangL. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 205-215.
11.
ChangW. C.WongK. (2008). Socially oriented achievement goals of Chinese university students in Singapore: Structure and relationships with achievement motives, goals and affective outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 880-895.
12.
ChomeyaR. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 399-403.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
DowsonM.McInerneyD. M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 35-42.
15.
DowsonM.McInerneyD. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91-113.
16.
DowsonM.McInerneyD. M. (2004). The development and validation of the Goal Orientation and Learning Strategies Survey (GOALS-S). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 290-310.
17.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
18.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.SchiefeleU. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In DamonW. (Series Ed.) EisenbergN. (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
19.
ElliotA. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
ElliotA.McGregorH. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
21.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.
22.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
23.
FordM. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
GanoticeF. A. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of scores on Inventory of School Motivation (ISM), Sense of Self Scale, and Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire (FCQ): A study using a Philippine sample. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 59-78.
25.
GanoticeF. A.BernardoA. B. I.KingR. B. (2011). Adapting the Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire (FCQ) for Philippine research: Validating English and Filipino versions. Unpublished manuscript.
26.
GarlandR. (1991). The midpoint on a rating scale: Is it desirable?Marketing Bulletin, 2, 66-70.
27.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.
28.
KingR. B.WatkinsD. A. (2011). The reliability and validity of the Goal Orientation and Learning Strategies Survey (GOALS-S): A Filipino investigation. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 579-594.
29.
LemosM. S. (1996). Students’ and teachers’ goals in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 151-171.
30.
LeondariA.GonidaE. (2007). Predicting academic self-handicapping in different age groups: The role of personal achievement goals and social goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 595-611.
31.
MaehrM. L. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In AmesR.AmesC. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 115-144). New York, NY: Academic Press.
32.
MaehrM.McInerneyD. M. (2004). Motivation as personal investment. In McInerneyD.Van EttenS. (Eds.), Sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (pp. 61-90). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
33.
MaehrM. L.ZushoA. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77-104). New York, NY: Routlege.
34.
MansfieldC. (2009). Managing multiple goals in real learning contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 286-298.
35.
MarshH. W. (1997). The measurement of physical self-concept: A construct validation approach. In FoxK. (Ed.), The physical self-concept: From motivation to well-being (pp. 27-58). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36.
MartinA. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.
37.
MartinA. J.DowsonM. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327-365.
38.
MatellM. S.JacobyJ. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657-674.
39.
McInerneyD. (2008). Personal investment, culture, and learning: Insights into school achievement across Anglo, Aboriginal, Asian, and Lebanese students in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 870-879.
40.
McInerneyD.DowsonM.YeungA. S. (2005). Facilitating conditions for school motivation: Construct validity and applicability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 1046-1066.
41.
MillerR. B.GreeneB. A.MontalvoG. P.RavindranB.NicholsJ. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422.
42.
MurayamaK.ZhouM.NesbitJ. C. (2009). A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of responses to the Achievement Goal Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 266-286.
43.
NelsonR. M.DeBackerT. K. (2008). Achievement motivation in adolescents: The role of peer climate and best friends. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 170-189.
44.
PintrichP. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching learning contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
45.
RyanA. M.HicksL.MidgleyC. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 143-171.
46.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
UllmanJ. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 653-771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
UrdanT.MaehrM. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213-243.
50.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD. M.AkandeM.LeeC. (2003). An investigation of ethnic differences in the motivation and strategies for learning of students in desegregated South African schools. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 34, 189-194.
51.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD. M.BoholstF. (2003). The reliability and validity of the Inventory of School Motivation: A Filipino investigation. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 12, 87-100.
52.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD. M.LeeC. (2002). Assessing the school motivation of Hong Kong students. Psychologia, 45, 144-154.
53.
WatkinsD.McInerneyD.LeeC.AkandeA.RegmiM. (2002). Motivation and learning strategies: A cross-cultural perspective. In McInerneyD. M.Van EttenS. (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 329-343). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
54.
WellbornJ. G.ConnellJ. P. (1987). Student engagement and disaffection in school student report. Rochester, NY: Rochester Assessment Package for Schools.
55.
WentzelK. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411-419.
56.
WentzelK. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding students’ academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
57.
WitkowM. R.FuligniA. J. (2007). Achievement goals and daily school experiences among adolescents with Asian, Latino, and European American backgrounds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 584-596.
58.
WoltersC. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.
59.
YuA. B.YangK. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KagitcibasiC.ChoiS. C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
ZushoA.NjokuH. (2007). Culture and motivation to learn: Exploring the generalizability of achievement goal theory. In SaliliF.HoosainR. (Eds.), Culture, motivation, and learning: A multicultural perspective (pp. 91-113). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
