Achievement goal theory helps describe how and why students engage in various academic behaviors. Historically, achievement goals have been examined almost exclusively with undergraduate, nonminority samples, and predominately with factor analytic techniques. The present study adds to a growing literature by providing initial validation of a leading achievement goal measure, the Achievement Goal Questionnaire-Revised (AGQ-R; Elliot & Murayama, 2008), among rural (N = 186) and urban (N = 197) African American high school students. Collectively, results from both confirmatory factor and Rasch analyses highlight issues that should be considered when using the AGQ-R among African American high school students.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2.
AndrichD. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
3.
BomanP.CurtisD.FurlongM. J.SmithD. C. (2006). Cross-validation and Rasch analyses of the Australian version of the Multidimensional School Anger Inventory-Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 225-242.
4.
CampbellH.BarryC.JoeJ.FinneyS. (2008). Configural, metric, and scalar invariance of the modified achievement goal questionnaire across African American and white university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 988-1007.
5.
ChiangY. T.YehY. C.LinS. S. J.HwangF. M. (2011). Factor structure and predictive utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal model in a sample of Taiwan students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 432-437.
6.
ElderG. H.Jr.KingV.CongerR. D. (1996). Attachment to place and migration prospects: A developmental perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 397-425.
7.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
8.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.
9.
FinneyS. J.PieperS.BarronK. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 365-382.
10.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
HektnerJ. M. (1995). When moving up implies moving out: Rural adolescent conflict in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 11, 13-14.
12.
HowleyC. W. (2006). Remote possibilities: Rural children’s educational aspirations. Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 62-80.
13.
HullemanC. S.SchragerS. M.BodmannS. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs of different constructs with similar labels?Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422-449.
LopezW. (1996). Communication validity and rating scales. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10, 482-483.
17.
LudlowL. H.EnterlineS.Cochran-SmithM. (2008). Learning to teach for social justice–beliefs scale: An application of Rasch measurement principles. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 194-214.
18.
McKinnonJ. (2003). The Black population in the United States: March 2002 (Current Population Reports, Series P20-541). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
19.
MokM. (2004). Validation of scores from self-learning scales for primary students using true-score and Rasch measurement methods. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 258-286.
20.
MuisK. R.WinneP. H.EdwardsO. V. (2009). Modern psychometrics for assessing achievement goal orientation: a Rasch analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 547-576.
21.
MurayamaK.ZhouM.NesbitJ. (2009). A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of responses to the Achievement Goal Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 266-286.
22.
PastorD. A.RiChardeR. G. (2003, April). Investigation of differential item functioning for African American and Anglo-American college students in the modified achievement goal questionnaire. Poster presented at the National Council of Measurement in Education’s Graduate Student Poster Session, Chicago, IL.
23.
PintrichP. R.SchunkD. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
24.
RojewskiJ. W. (1999). Career-related predictors of work-bound and college-bound status of adolescents in rural and nonrural areas. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15, 141-156.
25.
RoyalK. D.ElahiF. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Death Anxiety Scale (DAS) among terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 29, 359-371.
26.
WolfeE. W.RayL. M.HarrisD. C. (2004). A Rasch analysis of three measures of teacher perception generated from the school and staffing survey. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 842-860.
27.
WolfeE. W.SmithE. V.Jr.(2007). Understanding Rasch measurement: Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II—Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204-234.
28.
WrightB. D.LinacreJ. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
29.
WuC. H.ChenL. H. (2010). Examining dual meanings of items in 2 × 2 achievement goal questionnaires through MTMM modeling and MDS approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 305-322.
