Preliminary findings indicate that positive relations between parents and teachers are associated with successful school outcomes for children. However, measures available to assess parent–teacher relations are scant. The current study examined validity evidence for the Parent–Teacher Relationship Scale–II (PTRS). Specifically, the internal structure of the PTRS and the test–criterion relationships between the PTRS and several important child-level variables were examined. Primary school teachers (n = 120) completed the PTRS referencing two different parents of children in their classroom, as well as outcome measures about both of these parent’s children (i.e., academic competence, student–teacher relationship, and behavior). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the two-factor solution originally proposed by the PTRS authors. Associations between the PTRS and child outcome variables provided further evidence in support of test–criterion relationships. School mental health professionals and researchers seeking to assess the contributions of parent–teacher relations to academic and behavioral outcomes of children should consider administering the PTRS.
BarbarinO. (2000). Home-School Relationships Questionnaire. Unpublished measure. National Center for Early Development and Learning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.22.6.723
3.
CampbellF. A.RameyC. T.PungelloE.SparlingJ.Miller-JohnsonS. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42-57.
4.
ChristensonS. L. (1995). Supporting home-school collaboration. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, III (pp. 253-267). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
5.
ChristensonS. L.SheridanS. M. (2001). School and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
6.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parent involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-23.
8.
FishelM.RamirezL. (2005). Evidence-based parent involvement interventions with school-aged children. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 371-402.
9.
FloydF. J.WidamenK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment Instruments, 7, 286-299.
10.
GarbaczS. A.SheridanS. M.KoziolN. A.KwonK.HolmesS. R. (2015). Congruence in parent-teacher communication: Implications for the efficacy of CBC for students with behavioral concerns. School Psychology Review, 44, 150-168.
11.
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Denver.
12.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
13.
Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s Education?Review of Educational Research, 67, 3-42.
14.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
15.
HughesJ. N.GleasonK. A.ZhangD. (2005). Relationship influences on teachers’ perceptions of academic competence in academically at-risk minority and majority first grade students. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 303-320.
JeromeE. M.HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2008). Teacher-child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development, 18, 915-945. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x
19.
KohlG. O.LenguaL. J.McMahonR. J.Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2000). Parent involvement in school conceptualizing multiple dimensions and their relations with family and demographic risk factors. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 501-525.
20.
LoneyJ.MilichR. (1982). Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice. In WolraichM.RouthD. K. (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 3, pp. 113-147). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21.
MacCullumR. C.WidamenK. F.PreacherK. J.HongS. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611-637.
22.
MahoneyM. A. (2010). The relation between parent involvement and student academic achievement: Parent, teacher, and child perspectives (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ohio University, Athens.
23.
MautoneJ. A.CarsonK.PowerT. J. (2014). Best practices in linking families and schools to educate children with attention problems. In ThomasA.HarrisonP. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (6th ed., pp. 519-532). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
24.
MautoneJ. A.MarcelleE.TrescoK. E.PowerT. J. (2014). Assessing the quality of parent-teacher relationships for students with ADHD. Psychology in the Schools, 52(2), 196-207. doi:10.1002/pits.21817
25.
Miller-JohnsonS.Maumary-GremaudA. (2000). Parent-Teacher Involvement Questionnaire: Teacher version (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Available from http://www.fasttrackproject.org
26.
Moorman KimE.SheridanS. M.KwonK.KoziolN. (2013). Parents beliefs and children’s social-behavioral functioning: The mediating role of parent-teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 175-185.
27.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013b). Number and percentage of public school students eligible for free or reduced-priced lunch, by state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2011-12. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_204.10.asp
30.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
OsborneJ. W. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Louisville, NY: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
32.
OwensJ. S.HozaB. (2003). The role of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in the positive illusory bias. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 680-691.
33.
PelhamW. E.MilichR.MurphyD. A.MurphyH. A. (1989). Normative data on the IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 259-262.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.PiantaR. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: A theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 491-511.
37.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.PiantaR. C.CoxM. J.BradleyR. H. (2003). Teacher-rated family involvement and children’s social and academic outcomes in kindergarten. Early Education and Development, 14, 179-198.
38.
SerpellZ. N.MashburnA. J. (2012). Family-school connectedness and children’s early social development. Social Development, 21, 21-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00623.x
39.
SheridanS. M.BovairdJ. S.GloverT. A.GarbaczS. A.WhiteA.KwonK. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of parent-teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 23-46.
40.
SheridanS. M.KratochwillT. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
41.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Principal component and factor analysis. In TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 635-707). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
42.
VickersH. S.MinkeK. M. (1995). Exploring parent-teacher relationships: Joining and communication to others. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 133-150.
43.
WaschbuschD. A.WilloughbyM. T. (2008). Parent and teacher ratings on the IOWA Conners Rating Scale. Journal of Psychopathology of Behavioral Assessment, 30, 180-192.
