The factor structure of the Teacher–Child Rating Scale (T-CRS 2.1) was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A cross-sectional study was carried out on 68,497 children in prekindergarten through Grade 10. Item reduction was carried out based on modification indices, standardized residual covariance, and standardized factor loadings. A higher order model with a general super-ordinate factor fit the data well, and is consistent with the notion of a unidimensional non-cognitive set of learning-related skills. Model-based reliability estimates are provided.
ByrneB. (2010). Structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Routledge.
2.
DenhamS. A.BlairK. A.DeMulderE.LevitasJ.SawyerK.Auerbach-MajorS.QueenanP. (2003). Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence?Child Development, 74, 238-256.
3.
GuzmanM. P.JellinekM.GeorgeM.HartleyM.SquicciariniA. M.CanenguezK. M.. . . MurphyJ. M. (2011). Mental health matters in elementary school: First-grade screening predicts fourth grade achievement test scores. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 401-411.
4.
HightowerA. D.WorkW. C.CowenE. L.LotyczewskiB.SpinellA.GuareJ.RohrbeckC. (1986). The Teacher-Child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15, 393-409.
5.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, Regent’s College, London, England.
6.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
7.
KamphausR. W.ThorpeJ. S.WinsorA. P.KronckeA. P.DowdyE. T.VanDeventerM. C. (2007). Development and predictive validity of a teacher screener for child behavioral and emotional problems at school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 342-356.
8.
McClellandM. M.MorrisonF. J.HolmesD. L. (2000). Children at risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 307-329.
9.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
11.
MeagherS. M.ArnoldD. H.DoctoroffG. L.DobbsJ.FisherP. H. (2009). Social–emotional problems in early childhood and the development of depressive symptoms in school-age children. Early Education and Development, 20, 1-24.
12.
MoilanenK. L.ShawD. S.MaxwellK. L. (2010). Developmental cascades: Externalizing, internalizing, and academic competence from middle childhood to early adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 635-653.
13.
NationM.CrustoC.WandersmanA.KumpferK. L.SeyboltD.Morrissey-KaneE.DavinoK. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, 449-456.
14.
PerkinsP. E.HightowerA. D. (2002). T-CRS 2.1 Teacher-Child Rating Scale: Examiner’s manual. Rochester, NY: Children’s Institute.
15.
RapportM. D.DenneyC. B.ChungK.-M.HustaceK. (2001). Internalizing behavior problems and scholastic achievement in children: Cognitive and behavioral pathways as mediators of outcome. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 536-551.
16.
RomerD.McIntoshM. (2005). The roles and perspectives of school mental health professionals in promoting adolescent mental health behavioral or emotional problems. In SeligmanM. E. P.O’BrienC. P. (Eds.), Treating and preventing adolescent mental health disorders: What we know and what we don’t know (pp. 598-615). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von EyeA.CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 285-305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
SmithD. D.TylerN. C. (2010). Introduction to special education: Making a difference. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
19.
SteigerJ. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898.
