The study explored the invariance of Filipino and English versions of the Inventory of School Motivation (ISM) for Filipino-English bilingual students. There was invariance in the factor structure and factor loadings across the two language versions. Between-network construct validation showed consistent associations between ISM-mastery goals and sense-of-self dimensions.
BagozziR. P.HeathertonT. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 25-67.
2.
BernardoA. B. I. (2008). Exploring epistemological beliefs of bilingual Filipino preservice teachers in the Filipino and English languages. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 193-208.
3.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
5.
DimitrovD. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121-149.
6.
GanoticeF. A.BernardoA. B. I. (2010). Validating the factors of the English and Filipino versions of the Sense of Self Scale. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 43, 81-99.
7.
HauK. T.HoI. T. (2008). Editorial: Insights from research on Asian students’ achievement motivation. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 865-869.
8.
HensonR. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
9.
LanceC. E.WoehrD. J.FisicaroS. A. (1991). Cognitive categorization processes in performance evaluation: Confirmatory tests of two models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 1-20.
10.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question: Weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
11.
MaehrM. L.McInerneyD. M. (2004). Motivation as personal investment. In McInerneyD. M.Van EttenS. (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and achievement, Vol. 4: Big theories revisited (pp. 61 -90). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
12.
ManeesriwongulW.DixonJ. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: A methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 175-186.
13.
MartinA. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.
14.
McInerneyD. M. (2008). Personal investment, culture and learning: Insights into school achievement across Anglo, Aboriginal, Asian, and Lebanese students in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 870-879.
15.
McInerneyD. M.AliJ. (2006). Multidimensional and hierarchical assessment of school motivation: Cross-cultural validation. Educational Psychology, 26, 595-612.
16.
McInerneyD. M.HinkleyJ.DowsonM.Van EttenS. (1998). Aboriginal, Anglo, and immigrant Australian students’ motivational beliefs about personal academic success: Are there cultural differences?Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 621-629.
17.
McInerneyD. M.SinclairK. E. (1992). Dimensions of school motivation. A cross-cultural validation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 389-406.
18.
McInerneyD. M.YeungS. Y.McInerneyV. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of the Inventory of School Motivation (ISM). Journal of Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 134-152.
19.
WatkinsD. A.GerongA. (1999). Language of response and the spontaneous self-concept. A test of the cultural accommodation hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 115-121.
20.
WatkinsD. A.McInerneyD. M.BoholstF. A. (2003). The reliability and validity of the Inventory of School Motivation: A Philippine investigation. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 12, 87-100.
21.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
