Siting decisions for hazardous waste incineration continue to be delayed and impeded by adverse public reaction. Improved public relations and education of the public about risks are the favoured approaches amongst many experts and the industry for allaying public concerns. This paper identifies the limited potential for such strategies and advocates instead attention to the whole risk management system for hazardous waste siting decisions. The paper's conclusions and recommendations arise from an examination of the nature, sources and impact of public concerns about incineration in the U.K.
Covello, V.T., von Winterfeldt, D. & Slovic, P. (1986), Risk communication: A review of the literature . Risk Abstracts3(4), 171.
2.
Covello, V.T. (1989), Informing people about risks from chemicals, radiation, and other toxic substances: A review of obstacles to public understanding and effective risk communication. In Prospects and Problems in Risk Communication (W. Leiss, ed.) Canada: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo Press.
3.
Cvetkovich, G. & Wiedemann, P.M. (1988), Results of the working group: trust & credibility in risk communication. In Themes & Tasks of Risk Communication (H. Jungermann, R. E. Kasperson & P. H. Wiedemann, eds). Julich, Germany: KFA.
4.
Elliot, M.L.P. (1984), Improving community acceptance of hazardous waste facilities through alternative systems for mitigating and managing risk, Hazardous Waste1, 397-410.
5.
Health and Safety Executive (1988), The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. London, U.K.: HMSO.
6.
Health and Safety Executive (1989), Risk criteria for land-use planning in the vicinity of major industrial hazards . London, U.K.: HMSO.
House of Commons Environment Committee Report ( 1989), Toxic Waste. London, U.K.: HMSO.
9.
House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities Report (1989), Air Pollution from Municipal Waste Incineration Plants. London, U.K.: HMSO.
10.
Kasperson, R.E. & Kasperson, J.X. (1984), Determining the acceptability of risk: ethical and policy measures. Clark University , Worcester, MA, U.S.A.: Center for Technology, Development and Environment.
11.
Lowe, M. (1990), Public perceptions of the waste industry around a hazardous waste landfill. Unpublished for Diploma in Hazardous Waste Management, Loughborough University of Technology, U.K.
12.
O'Riordan, T. (1990), Hazard and risk in the modern world: political models for programme design. In Hazards and the Communication of Risk (J. Handmer & E. Penning-Rowsell, eds). London, U.K.: Gower.
13.
Petts, J. (1990), Land-use planning and major hazard control: information requirements for risk discussions at the local level. OECD Workshop: The Role of Public Authorities in Preventing Major Accidents and in Major Accident Hazard Land-Use Planning, February 19-21, 1990, London, U.K.
14.
Petts, J. (in press), Risk management and communication. Decision making and risk. In Reliability, Safety and Risk Management: An Integrated Approach. (S. Cox and R. Tait, eds). London: Butterworths/Heinemann .
15.
Portney, K.E. (1984), Allaying the NIMBY syndrome: the potential for compensation in hazardous waste treatment facility siting. Hazardous Waste1, 411-421.
16.
Sandmann, P.M. (1988), Hazard versus outrage: A conceptual framework for describing public perception of risk. In Themes and Tasks of Risk Communication (H. Jungermann, R. E. Kasperson & P. M. Wiedemann, eds). Julich, Germany: KFA.
17.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S. (1980), Perceived risk. In Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough ( R. Schwing & W. Albers, eds). New York: Plenum Press.
