Effective waste management is dependent upon achieving informed consensus amongst interested parties. Public concerns and opposition present a challenge to this consensus which must be tackled. This paper reviews our understanding of the basis of public concerns about waste management activities and suggests some means for dealing with these. The paper identifies a need for better understanding of the complexity of concerns, which are based not only upon risk perceptions but also a lack of trust and credibility in waste managers, decision-makers, and the decision processes and control mechanisms for waste facility siting and operation. Suggestions for dealing with these concerns are discussed relating to risk communication, improving decision processes, the control and management of waste activities, and improvement in "expert" understanding of the risks.
Armour, A. (1991) The siting of locally unwanted land uses. Progress in Planning35, 1-74.
2.
Covello, V.T. (1991) Risk comparisons and risk communication: issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risks. In Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Kasperson, R. E. & Stallen, P. J. M. (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 79-124.
3.
Covello, V.T. (1992) Risk communication: a new and emerging area of communication research. In Risk Assessment Proceedings of a Conference on Risk Assessment, 6-9 October, 1992. Health and Safety Executive, London, U.K. 1993, 474-489.
4.
Covello, V.T. & Allen, F. (1988) Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis, Washington DC, U.S.A.
5.
Department of the Environment. (1992) Planning, Pollution and Waste Management. Report by Environmental Resources Limited and Oxford Polytechnic School of Planning. HMSO, London, U.K.
6.
Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, U.S.A.
7.
Ducsik, D.W. (1978) Electricity Planning and the Environment: Toward A New Role for Government in the Decision Process. Unpublished Ph.D. Dept. of Civil Eng., MIT, Cambs., Mass., U.S.A.
8.
Farago, K., Vari, A. & Vecsenyi, J. (1989) Not in my town: conflicting views on the siting of a hazardous waste incinerator. Risk Analysis9, 463-471.
9.
Freudenberg, W.R. (1992) Heuristics, biases and the not-so-general publics: expertise and error in the assessment of risks. In Social Theories of Risk, Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (eds). Praeger, Connecticut, U.S.A. p. 229.
10.
Glaberson, W. (1988) Coping in an age of NIMBY. New York Times, June 19th, 1988.
11.
Greenberg, M.R., Anderson, R.F. & Kosenberger, K. (1984) Social and economic effects of hazardous waste management sites. Hazardous Waste1, 387-396.
Independent Panel on Intractable Waste (1992 ) A Cleaner Australia. Final Report, 3 Volumes.
16.
Independent Panel on Intractable Waste, New South Wales, Australia.
17.
Inhaber, H. (1991) A market-based solution to the problem of nuclear and toxic waste disposal. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association41, 808-816.
18.
Kemp, R. (1989) Planning and Consultation Procedures for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal: A Comparative Analysis of Overseas Experience . Research Report No. 1. Environmental Risk Assessment Unit, UEA, Norwich, U.K.
19.
National Research Council (1988) Improving Risk Communication. National Academy Press, Washington DC, U.S.A. p. 21.
20.
Noble, G. (1992) Siting Landfills and Other LULUs. Technomic Publishing Ltd, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
21.
NOP Market Research Limited (1990) Public Attitudes to the Disposal of Hazardous Waste in Cleveland. Social Science Division, NOP Market Research, London , U.K.
22.
O'Hare, M., Bacow, L. & Sanderson, D. (1983) Facility Siting and Public Opposition. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, U.S.A.
23.
Patel, N. & Edgcumbe, D. (1992) Some Observations on Municipal Solid Waste in Japan . Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) Report B00337, HMSO, London, U.K., p. 8.
24.
Petts, J. (1992) Incineration risk perceptions and public concern: experience in the UK improving risk communication. Waste Management & Research10, 169-182.
25.
Petts, J. (1993) Risk assessment, risk management and containment landfill. In Proceedings of the 1993 Harwell Waste Management Symposium, Containment Landfill, Environmental Safety Centre, AEA Technology, Harwell, Oxon., U.K., pp. 5-16.
26.
Petts, J. (in press) Stress and public concern over hazardous waste. In Human Stress and the Environment, Rose, J. (ed) Gordon Breach Science Publishers, Reading, U.K.
27.
Petts, J. & Eduljee, G. (1994) Environmental Impact Assessmentfor Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.
Price, J.R. (1988) Report: the impact of waste facilities on real estate values. Waste Management & Research6, 393-400.
31.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution ( 1993) Incineration of Waste 17th Report, HMSO, London, U.K., p. 96.
32.
Silbergeld, E.K. (1992) Risk assessment-the perspective and experience of the environmentalists. In Risk Assessment Proceedings of a Conference on Risk Assessment, 6-9 October, 1992. Health and Safety Executive, London, U.K., pp. 45-53.
33.
Sloan, W.M. (1993) Site Selection for New Hazardous Waste Management Facilities. WHO European Publications, European Series No. 46. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen, Denmark, p. 55.
34.
Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of risk. Science236, 280-285.
35.
Slovic, P. (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In Social Theories of Risk, Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (eds). Praeger, Connecticut, U.S.A., pp. 117-153.
36.
Susskind, L. (1992) Avoiding Environmental Siting Disputes. Heritage Trust Lecture, London, January 1992, Heritage Trust, London, U.K.
37.
Susskind, L. & Cruikshank, J. (1987) Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. Basic Books, Inc. , New York, U.S.A.
38.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory. Westview Press , Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
39.
Von Winterfeldt, D. (1992) Expert knowledge and public values in risk management: the role of decision analysis. In Social Theories of Risk, Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (eds). Praeger, Connecticut , U.S.A., pp. 321-341.
40.
Wiedemann, P.M. & Femers, S. (1990) Conflict Analysis & Management: Public Participation in Waste Management Decision Making. KFAJulich, Germany.
41.
Wiedemann, P.M. & Femers, S. (1993) Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials33, 355-368.
42.
Wright, S.A. (1993) Citizen information levels and grassroots opposition to new hazardous waste sites: Are NIMBYISTS informed? WasteManagement13, 253-259.
