To participate or not? Research on second-hand apparel recycling intention under the guidance of environmental psychology

Abstract

The apparel industry, one of the largest manufacturing industries in the world, generates a large amount of solid waste. It is necessary to reduce excessive apparel consumption in order to reduce waste of the apparel industry. This study takes China as an example to explore the residents’ second-hand apparel recycling intention (SARI). Purchasing second-hand, renting and swapping apparel are comprehensively defined as second-hand apparel (SA) recycling. Then, the influence of six environmental psychological factors on SARI is explored, including environmental concern (EC), trust in social media (TSM), consumer innovativeness (CI), face consciousness (FC), perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) and subjective norm (SN). In this study, 348 valid questionnaires are collected, and structural equation model is used to process the data. The results show that EC, CI and PCE have no significant effect on SARI. SN and TSM positively promote SARI, while FC has a negative effect. The results are expected to provide in-depth insights to further understand and improve the SARI of residents in emerging economies from the environmentally psychological level.

Keywords

Second-hand apparel recycling intention environmental concern trust in social media consumer innovativeness face consciousness perceived consumer effectiveness subjective norm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.

Ali

Guo

Ali

, et al. (2018) Customer motivations for sustainable consumption: Investigating the drivers of purchase behavior for a green-luxury car. Business Strategy and the Environment 28: 833–846.

Alzubaidi

Slade

Dwivedi

(2021) Examining antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. Journal of Business Research 122: 685–699.

Amatulli

Angelis

Korschun

, et al. (2018) Consumers’ perceptions of luxury brands’ CSR initiatives: An investigation of the role of status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production 194: 277–287.

Armstrong

Niinimäki

Kujala

, et al. (2015) Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 30–39.

Chan

Berger

Boven

(2012) Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research 39: 561–573.

Chang

Hsu

, et al. (2019) Effect of tangibilization cues on consumer purchase intention in the social media context: Regulatory focus perspective and the moderating role of perceived trust. Telematics and Informatics 44: 101265.

Chen

Yang

(2019) Research on the co-creation mechanism of online brand community value from the perspective of social network-the mediating role of consumer engagement. China Business and Market 33: 103–113.

Chen

Liu

(2010) An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics and new-product adoption behavior. Management Review 22: 35–41+62.

10.

Chin

(1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides

(ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.295–336.

11.

Dang

Nguyen

Pervan

(2020) Retailer corporate social responsibility and consumer citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of perceived consumer effectiveness and consumer trust. Journal of Retiling and Consumer Services 55: 102082.

12.

Dong

Gao

, et al. (2022) Energy transition and carbon neutrality: Exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 177: 106002.

13.

Dong

Zhang

, et al. (2021a) How does industrial convergence affect the energy efficiency of manufacturing in newly industrialized countries? Fresh evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 316: 128316.

14.

Dong

Pan

, et al. (2021b) How public and government matter in industrial pollution mitigation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 306: 127099.

15.

Dai

(2018) The doctrine of the mean: Reference groups and public information systems development. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 27: 257–273.

16.

Fornell

Larcker

(1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.

17.

Gan

Yang

Shao

, et al. (2010) Old clothes fashion and urban civilization——analysis of the development of second-hand clothing consumer market. Journal of Huadong University (Social Science) 10: 51–56.

18.

García-de-Frutos

Ortega-Egea

Martínez-del-Río

(2018) Anti-consumption for environmental sustainability: Conceptualization, review, and multilevel research directions. Journal of Business Ethics 48: 411–435.

19.

Ghahtarani

Sheikhmohammady

Rostami

(2020) The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers’ purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 5: 190–198.

20.

Greenpeace International (2016) Timeout for fast fashion. Available at: https://storage.googleapis.com/planet4-international-stateless/2018/01/6c356f9a-fact-sheet-timeout-for-fast-fashion.pdf (accessed 15 November 2016).

21.

Hair

Hult

GTM

Ringle

, et al. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

22.

Han

Kim

(2010) An investigation of green hotel customers, decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management 29: 659–668.

23.

Hao

Yin

(2019) Research on the acceptance of second-hand clothing trade of college students. Renewable Resources and Circular Economy 12: 23–26.

24.

Herrmann

Balmond

Gillet

, et al. (2017) A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future. Britain: Ellen Macarthur Foundation.

25.

Hsu

Chang

Yansritakul

(2017) Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 34: 145–152.

26.

Iran

Geiger

Schrader

(2019) Collaborative fashion consumption-a cross-cultural study between Tehran and Berlin. Journal of Cleaner Production 212: 313–323.

27.

Kabadayi

Dursun

Alan

, et al. (2015) Green purchase intention of young Turkish consumers: Effects of consumers’ guilt, self-monitoring and perceived consumer effectiveness. Self-Monitoring and Perceived Consumer Effectiveness 207: 165–174.

28.

Kai

Haokai

(2016) Factors affecting consumers’ green commuting. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12: 527–538.

29.

Kim

Kang

Lee

(2020) How social capital impacts the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. Journal of Business 117: 596–603.

30.

Lang

Armstrong

CMJ

(2018) Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness, and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping. Sustainable Production and Consumption 13: 37–47.

31.

Lang

Armstrong

Liu

(2016) Creativity and sustainable apparel retail models: Does consumers’ tendency for creative choice counter-conformity matter in sustainability? Fashion and Textiles 3: 24.

32.

Lang

Zhang

(2019) Second-hand clothing acquisition: The motivations and barriers to clothing swaps for Chinese consumers. Sustainable Production and Consumption 18: 156–164.

33.

Lao

(2013) Research on mechanism of consumer innovativeness influences green consumption behavior. Nankai Business Review 16: 106–113.

34.

Yang

, et al. (2018) Influence of conspicuous consumption motivation on high-carbon consumption behavior of residents – an empirical case study of Jiangsu province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 191: 167–178.

35.

(2018) Unspoken crisis: Mounting textile waste in China. Available at: https://www.coresponsibility.com/unspoken-crisis-mounting-textile-waste-in-china/(accessed 5 July 2018).

36.

Moorhouse

(2020) Making fashion sustainable: Waste and collective responsibility. One Earth 3: 17–19.

37.

Morton

Anable

Nelson

(2016) Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business & Management 18: 18–28.

38.

Nayak

Akbari

Far

(2019) Recent sustainable trends in Vietnam’s fashion supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production 225: 291–303.

39.

Nunnally

Berstein

(1994) Paychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

40.

Park

Lin

(2020) Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research 117: 623–628.

41.

Paul

Modi

Patel

(2016) Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 29: 123–134.

42.

Policarpo

Aguiar

(2020) How self-expressive benefits relate to buying a hybrid car as a green product. Journal of Cleaner Production 252: 119859.

43.

(2011) Face: A Chinese concept in a global sociology. Journal of Sociology 47: 279–296.

44.

Rausch

Kopplin

(2021) Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production 278: 123882.

45.

Roehrich

(2004) Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research 57: 671–677.

46.

Roos

Hahn

(2019) Understanding collaborative consumption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior with value-based personal norms. Journal of Business Ethics 158: 679–697.

47.

Setyawan

Noermijati

Sunaryo

, et al. (2018) Green product buying intentions among young consumers: Extending the application of theory of planned behavior. Problems and Perspectives in Management 16: 145–154.

48.

Sharma

Forpon

(2019) Green product attributes and green purchase behavior: A theory of planned behavior perspective with implications for circular economy. Management Decision 57: 1018–1042.

49.

Shrivastava

Jain

Kamble

, et al. (2021) Sustainability through online renting clothing: Circular fashion fueled by Instagram micro-celebrities. Journal of Cleaner Production 278: 123772.

50.

Sujata

Khor

Ramayah

, et al. (2019) The role of social media on recycling behavior. Sustainable Production and Consumption 20: 365–374.

51.

Sun

Dong

(2022) Decomposition of carbon emission reduction efficiency and potential for clean energy power: Evidence from 58 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 363: 132312.

52.

Tan

Ooi

Goh

(2017) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 107: 459–471.

53.

Tandon

Dhir

Kaur

, et al. (2020) Why do people buy organic food? The moderating role of environmental concerns and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service 57: 102247.

54.

Taufique

KMR

Vaithianathan

(2018) A fresh look at understanding green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production 183: 46–55.

55.

Wang

Shen

Jin

(2017) Measurement of public awareness of climate change in China: Based on a national survey with 4025 samples. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment 15: 285–291.

56.

WARP (2012) Valuing Our Clothes: The True Cost of How We Design, Use and Dispose of Clothing in the UK. Oxon, UK: Waste & Resources Action Programme.

57.

Wei

Ang

Jancenelle

(2018) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 45: 230–238.

58.

Wei

Jung

(2017) Understanding Chinese consumers’ intention to purchase sustainable fashion products: The moderating role of face-saving orientation. Sustainability 9: 1570.

59.

Weismueller

Harrigan

Wang

, et al. (2020) Influencer endorsements: How advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media. Australasian Marketing Journal 28: 160–170.

60.

Wood

Strdler

Simas

, et al. (2018) Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: Resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. Journal of Industrial Ecology 22: 553–564.

61.

Hua

Wang

, et al (2020a) Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 156: 104721.

62.

Wang

(2020b) Consumer’s intention to purchase green furniture: Do health consciousness and environmental awareness matter? Science of the Total Environment 704: 135275.

63.

Zhang

Liu

, et al. (2020) Consumers’ clothing disposal behaviors in Nanjing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 276: 123184.

64.

Zhang

Dong

(2021) How virtual social capital affects behavioral intention of sustainable clothing consumption pattern in developing economies? A case study of China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 170: 105616.

65.

Zhang

Dong

(2022) What affects residents’ behavioral intentions to ban gasoline vehicles? Evidence from an emerging economy. Energy 263: 125716.

66.

Zhao

Lee

Copeland

(2019) Social media and Chinese consumers’ environmentally sustainable apparel purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 31: 855–874.