Analyzing effective municipal solid waste recycling programs: the case of county-level MSW recycling performance in Florida,USA

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) recycling performance, both nationally and in Florida, USA, has shown little improvement during the past decade. This research examines variations in the MSW recycling program performance in Florida counties in an attempt to identify effective recycling programs. After reviewing trends in the MSW management literature, we conducted an empirical analysis using cross-sectional multiple regression analysis. The findings suggest that the convenience-based hypothesis was supported by showing that curbside recycling had a positive effect on MSW recycling performance. Financial (cost-saving) incentive-based hypotheses were partially supported meaning that individual level incentives can influence recycling performance. Citizen environmental concern was found to positively affect the amount of county recycling, while education and political affiliation yielded no significant results. In conclusion, this article discusses the implications of the findings for both academic research and practice of MSW recycling programs.

Keywords

Municipal solid waste recycling performance recycling convenience recycling financial incentive environmental concern

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aadland

Caplan

(2003) Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 409–502.

Aadland

Caplan

(2006) Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25: 855–874.

Barlaz

Loughlin

(2001) Strengthening Markets for Recyclables: A World Wide Perspective, Part 1. Policies for Strengthening Recycling in U.S. Raleigh, NC: Environmental Research and Education Foundation.

Berger

(1997) Recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 29: 515–531.

Berry

(1993) Understanding Regression Assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Chowdhury

(2009) Sustainable kerbside recycling in the municipal garbage contract. Waste Management & Research 27: 988–995.

Cook

Weisberg

(1983) Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika 70: 1–10.

Daneshvary

Schwer

(1998) Solid-waste recycling behavior and support for curbside textile recycling. Environment and Behavior 30: 144–161.

Dormina

Koch

(1999) Consumer reuse and recycling of post-consumer textile waste. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management 3: 346–359.

10.

Dormina

Koch

(2002) Convenience and frequency of recycling: Implications for including textiles in curbside recycling programs. Environment & Behavior 34: 216–238.

11.

Ebreo

Hershey

Vining

(1999) Reducing solid waste: Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environment and Behavior 31: 107–135.

12.

Ewing

(2001). Altruistic, egoistic, and normative effects on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 33: 733–764.

13.

Feiock

West

(1996). Explaining success of local recycling programs: A reassessment. International Journal of Public Administration 19: 1065–1085.

14.

Feiock

Kalan

(2001) Assessing the performance of solid waste recycling programs over time. American Review of Public Administration 31: 22–32.

15.

Florida DEP (Department of Environmental Protection) (2010a) 75% Recycling goal report to the legislature. Available at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/publications/shw/recycling/75percent/5_recycling_report.pdf (accessed 10 March 2011).

16.

Florida DEP (Department of Environmental Protection) (2010b) 2008 solid waste management data available Appendix A: Introduction [Data File]. Available at: http://appprod.dep.state.fl.us/www_rcra/reports/WR/Recycling/2008AnnualReport/AppendixA/2A.pdf (accessed 10 March 2011).

17.

Florida DEP (Department of Environmental Protection) (2012) Florida directory of recycled product vendors. Available at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/publications/shw/recycling/Recycled_Product_Dirctory.pdf (accessed 30 May 2012).

18.

Florida Senate (2011) 2010 Florida Statutes (including Special Session A). Available at: http://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2010/403.7032 (accessed 18 April 2011).

19.

Folz

(1991) Recycling program design, management, and participation: A national survey of municipal experience. Public Administration Review 51: 222–231.

20.

Folz

(1999) Municipal recycling performance: A public sector environmental success story. Public Administration Review 59: 336–345.

21.

Gamba

Oskamp

(1994). Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior 26: 587–612.

22.

Hamilton

(2006) Statistics with Stata: Updated for version 9. Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.

23.

Kalinowski

Lynne

Johnson

(2006) Recycling as a reflection of balanced self-interest: A test of metaeconomics approach. Environment and Behavior 38: 333–355.

24.

Kinnaman

(2000) Explaining the growth in municipal recycling programs: The role of market and nonmarket factors. Public Works Management Policy 5: 37–51.

25.

Kinnaman

Fullerton

(1997) Garbage and Recycling in Communities with Curbside Recycling and Unit-Based Pricing (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6021). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

26.

Mitchell

(1989) Recycling in Florida: Residential attitudes and behaviors. Florida Public Opinion 4: 2–8.

27.

Oskamp

Harrington

Edwards

Sherwood

Okuda

Swanson

(1991) Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior 23: 494–519.

28.

Owens

Dickerson

Macintosh

(2000) Demographic covariates of residential recycling efficiency. Environment and Behavior 32: 637–650.

29.

Reschovsky

Stone

(1994) Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13: 120–139.

30.

Sidique

Joshi

Lupi

(2010) Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 54: 242–249.

31.

Staples

Cornelius

Gibbs

(1999) Noise disturbance from a developing airport: Perceived risk or general annoyance? Environment and Behavior 31: 692–710.

32.

Van Haaren

Themelis

Goldstein

(2010) The state of garbage in America. Biocycle 51: 16–23.

33.

Van Liere

Dunlap

(1980) The social basis of environmental concern: A review of explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 129–148.

34.

Vogt

(2005) Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology:A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

35.

US GAO (General Accounting Office) (2007) Recycling: Additional efforts could increase municipal recycling. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0737.pdf (accessed 10 March 2011).

36.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) Waste prevention, recycling, and composting options: lessons from 30 communities. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/downloads/recy-com/toc.pdf (accessed 1 January 2012).